Tucson TV Station Broadcasts Arizona Fort Huachuca Terror Threat Report


KOLD News 13 Tucson is currently running a special report focused on a urgent FBI report outlining a possible terrorist threat in southern Arizona. It speaks specifically to Fort Huachuca in Sierra Vista.

To all the whining I get from people accusing me of being such a bigot against islam, well I have one thing to say to them:

DUH! THERE IS A REASON AND IT’S EXPOSED HERE IN THIS REPORT MORONS! WE HERE IN SOUTHERN ARIZONA HAVE TO LIVE WITH THE BULLSHIT. We deal with not only terrorist activity but it’s piggy backed onto illegal immigration. We are not happy people here–and we’re furious with Washington and our idiot representatives like Raul Grijalva and Gabrielle Giffords and they’re appeasement of these criminals.

If you don’t like my attitude, go suck a rock. Then go read the report.

read more | digg story

Catch the Wave!

Tucson TV Station Broadcasts Arizona Fort Huachuca Terror Threat Report


KOLD News 13 Tucson is currently running a special report focused on a urgent FBI report outlining a possible terrorist threat in southern Arizona. It speaks specifically to Fort Huachuca in Sierra Vista.

To all the whining I get from people accusing me of being such a bigot against islam, well I have one thing to say to them:

DUH! THERE IS A REASON AND IT’S EXPOSED HERE IN THIS REPORT MORONS! WE HERE IN SOUTHERN ARIZONA HAVE TO LIVE WITH THE BULLSHIT. We deal with not only terrorist activity but it’s piggy backed onto illegal immigration. We are not happy people here–and we’re furious with Washington and our idiot representatives like Raul Grijalva and Gabrielle Giffords and they’re appeasement of these criminals.

If you don’t like my attitude, go suck a rock. Then go read the report.

read more | digg story

Catch the Wave!

Myth vs Fact-Part 153

Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526

Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.

Tafsir

Myth vs Fact-Part 153

Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526

Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.

Tafsir

Flight 93 Memorial–UPDATE


Last week, we brought you an ACTION ALERT regarding the planned Flight 93 Memorial and its blatant appeasement to the people who killed over 3,000 people September 11, 2001. What’s the controversy? The memorial is planned as an islamic crescent of embrace, with the main feature facing toward Mecca. After sending out the emails to the appropriate people, we received the following responses:

From JoAnne Hanley (Joanne_Hanley@nps.gov) AND David Barna (David_Barna@nps.gov) (They sent IDENTICAL letters to those writing):


Thank you for sharing your concerns with me about the design of the
Flight 93 National Memorial. You can be assured that the National Park
Service (NPS) is committed to a national memorial that conveys the full honor
due to the heroes of Flight 93, building the memorial, and continuing to
commemorate those heroes who lost their lives on September 11, 2001.


This response has two parts. The first part describes the process used
to select the memorial design, the people and groups involved in the
decision-making, and the steps the National Park Service took when concerns
were first raised about the design. The second part is an attachment, a
letter sent on November 9, 2007 to Congressman Tancredo from the Families
of Flight 93. The group seeks to honor their loved ones--the people lost
on the flight--and their letter describes their pain and the view that
blogger Alec Rawls presents "preposterous opinions that the designer and
design are Muslim or Islamist conspirators who seek to memorialize
murderers. Nothing could be more offensive to the Families whose loved
ones died so that folks like Mr. Rawls can be free to expel such hurtful
and unsubstantiated accusations."

The National Park Service is aware of concerns about the memorial design
and took steps last year to investigate the issue. In doing so, the NPS
consulted with university and religious scholars, all of whom concluded
that the memorial design does not imply or depict religious iconography. In
light of those findings, the National Park Service and all three of its
partner organizations continue to support the final design for the Flight
93 memorial.

It may be helpful to understand the partners and the design selection
process. Four organizations partnered to organize and implement the process
for choosing a memorial design. The Families of Flight 93 is a nonprofit
organization of family members of the passengers and crew who died on the
flight. The Flight 93 Advisory Commission was created by Congress to
prepare a report containing recommendations for the planning, design,
construction, and long-term management of a permanent memorial at the crash
site. The Flight 93 Memorial Task Force serves as the Commission's
operational arm and includes Flight 93 family members, community members,
first responders, educators, and other local, regional, and national
stakeholders. The National Park Service is the federal agency charged with
administering Flight 93 National Memorial.

These four partner organizations agreed that an open design competition
would be the most inclusive, transparent, and democratic way to explore a
range of designs for the memorial. The competition was open to design
professionals, as well as to the public, and was conducted in two stages
with two separate juries. The stage I jury analyzed approximately 1,000
submissions and forwarded five finalist designs to the stage II jury. The
five finalist designs were exhibited for public comment in Somerset,
Pennsylvania
, and on the project website. The stage II jury, which was
composed of noted design professionals, Flight 93 family members, and
community leaders, reviewed the public comments and evaluated the designs
against the memorial's mission statement. By a majority, the stage II jury
voted in favor of Mr. Murdoch's design and then, to reinforce their support
of the design, took a second, unanimous vote to support the design created
by Mr. Murdoch.

After the winning design was announced, the NPS received some inquiries
from the public about what they perceived as Islamic symbolism in the
memorial design. While the architect, Mr. Murdoch, had not intended any
such symbolism in the design, he nonetheless refined aspects of the design
in response to the perceptions.

The most prominent refinement was in the treatment of the naturally
occurring bowl-shaped landscape feature. The design now surrounds that area
with a circle of trees which is broken in two places--the location which
marks the flight path as it breaks the circular continuity of the bowl
edge, and the Sacred Ground where the crash occurred. The locations of the
two breaks in the circle are based on the flight path and crash site of
Flight 93.

Letter from the Families of Flight 93 to Congressman Tancredo (11-09-07):
(See attached file: FLNI Families of Fl 93 Ltr to Congressman Tancredo
11-09-07.doc)

Additional information can be found on the park web site: www.nps.gov/flni.
I thank you for your interest in the project.

Joanne M. Hanley, General Superintendent
National Parks of Western Pennsylvania
Allegheny Portage RR NHS, Flight 93 National Memorial, Fort Necessity
National Battlefield, Friendship Hill NHS, Johnstown Flood National
Memorial
109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501
office: 814.443.4557
fax: 814.443.2180

David Barna
Director of Public Affairs
National Park Service
Washington, DC

Here is the letter she references to Congressman Tancredo:

November 9, 2007

The Honorable Tom Tancredo
U.S. House of Representatives
1131 Longworth HOB
Washington, DC 20515 Dear Congressman Tancredo:

It is with deep regret that the Families of Flight 93 recently learned of your letter to NPS Director Mary Bomar that has been posted on several websites. Especially unfortunate was to see your unquestioned support of the conspiracy theorist, Alec Rawls. Mr. Rawls continues to disseminate misinformation, twist facts, and incite emotional furor over the Flight 93 Memorial design based on supposed patriotic grounds. Mr. Rawls has perpetrated a complete fabrication that the memorial design represents an Islamic crescent, and he has distorted drawings and orientation of the memorial to suit his most unpatriotic and self-serving purposes.

Former NPS Director Mainella reported to you in October 2005 that changes to the design would be made. Indeed, the perceived crescent shape was shortly thereafter extended more completely into a circle to alleviate any further misinterpretation of the site plan graphic. The circle, a symbol of unity, is symbolically broken in two places – where the flight path of the plane entered the “bowl” topography, and at the crash site itself. The entire design is referred to as “The Flight 93 National Memorial.” Unfortunately, Mr. Rawls refuses to acknowledge these design alterations have been made. Instead, undaunted by the rational efforts of others to discuss these points with Mr. Rawls, he continues to focus his vehemence in various public media on the original crescent shape and to expound his equally preposterous opinions that the designer and design are Muslim or Islamist conspirators who seek to memorialize murderers. Nothing could be more offensive to the Families whose loved ones died so that folks like Mr. Rawls can be free to expel such hurtful and unsubstantiated accusations.

The Families of Flight 93 overwhelmingly support the design and the design process, and reaffirmed that support by a unanimous vote of the Board of Directors as recently as two months ago. Oddly, when Mr. Gordon Felt, Treasurer, Families of Flight 93 last spoke to you in October 2005, you had indicated that you would support the design as long as the Families were satisfied. We are so satisfied, and have repeatedly and steadfastly said so, and so we are puzzled by your new found trust of a self-serving conspiracy blogger who does not represent the opinions or interest of the Families in any way. Indeed, quite the opposite, as Mr. Rawls, in our opinion, undermines the integrity and honor of our loved ones who died on Flight 93. We are also disappointed that neither you, nor your staff, have sought to establish what our position is with regard to this matter. The previous trust we placed in your word to one of our officers is now in doubt, as we have not been afforded the opportunity to learn of your changed position except through the blog Mr. Rawls’ offers.

We do, however, continue to value your opinion, as we do for all regardless of whether they disagree with our support of the Memorial, or not. We also want to have your support, and so we extend to you our open-ended offer to have you visit the site at your earliest opportunity, talk with Families’ representatives while there, and learn of how this elegant, but simple, design fits the terrain and meets the stated design competition expectations, as well as those of the Families and our partners..

Additionally, enclosed for your use and further information is a “White Paper” prepared by the project partners that documents the tremendously open and inclusive process by which the design was selected, the background of Alec Rawls’ interference, the many opportunities and courtesies given to Mr. Rawls by the project partners to address his concerns, and his unwelcome overtures and veiled threats to the Families and the project, as well as a chart that counters Mr. Rawls’ claims with the hard facts. Also enclosed is a letter sent by Flight 93 Advisory Commission Chairman John J. Reynolds to Mr. Rawls, requesting that he stop his persistent harassment, intimidation, and slander of the project partners.

We hope you find these documents useful, and we thank you in advance for your continued support of the Families of Flight 93 organization in our quest to build this memorial and honor the actions and the memories of our lost loved ones.

Sincerely yours,
FAMILIES OF FLIGHT 93

Ed Root, President
Patrick White, Vice-President
Gordon Felt, Treasurer
Carole O’Hare, Secretary
Debby Borza, Director
Beverly Burnett, Director
Christine Fraser, Director
Esther Heyman, Director
Christine Homer, Director
Elizabeth Kemmerer, Director
Catherine Miller, Director
Ken Nacke, Director
Hamilton Peterson, Director
Allison Vadhan, Director

Now, I don’t know about you, nor do I know if you were consulted about this design. Everybody I know–those whom I informed of this and brought this to their attention–were frankly OUTRAGED at the religious iconography they blatantly deny. The only change made by the designer was to add a bunch of trees–the placement of the trees is the star area.

Do we really want our murdered men and women honored with a memorial honoring their murderers? I don’t think so. I certainly don’t. To continue to push this design is just like lighting the Empire State Building up in green to honor Eid–to honor the islamic murderers and appease them at the end of the month of ramadan.

The original article, complete with contact links is here. Let your voices be heard. It’s time to say enough is enough–our tax dollars are being used to appease these monsters with special footbaths, prayer rooms and cafeterias at our federally funded colleges; we have taxi drivers in Minnesota refusing to accomodate Americans because of THEIR religion–and it’s okay; Minnesota’s congressman Keith Ellison works hand in hand with the terrorist front group CAIR and has made statements he will do all he can to force islam on America; our children are being indoctrinated into the religion of hate in school; Christmas is spat upon but there’s no end to appeasing islamics. Separation of church and state should go for ALL faiths, not just Judeo Christian. I refuse to allow my children to be taught and indoctrinated into the islamic hate.

And this memorial? It’s not a memorial to the men and women murdered on Flight 93–it’s a memorial to the murderers of those men and women, a memorial to the ones who murdered Americans without regard to age, gender or reason–not to the Americans who saved the Pentagon by taking the plane down when they realized what was happening.

And these planners think we’re completely blind and stupid, that we can’t see the crescent of embrace in the design, even to the color.

Are you going to let them continue to do this? Are you going to sit idly by while these planners force the religious iconography glorifying the murderers of Flight 93 down your throats? Are you going to continue to allow this political correctness garbage continue to infect this country?

Why are Barna and Hanley stubbornly set upon honoring the murderers rather than the murdered American heroes? That’s the real question–and I say follow the money.

Let your voice be heard. Follow the links and email your letters. Contacts are here.

Flight 93 Memorial–UPDATE


Last week, we brought you an ACTION ALERT regarding the planned Flight 93 Memorial and its blatant appeasement to the people who killed over 3,000 people September 11, 2001. What’s the controversy? The memorial is planned as an islamic crescent of embrace, with the main feature facing toward Mecca. After sending out the emails to the appropriate people, we received the following responses:

From JoAnne Hanley (Joanne_Hanley@nps.gov) AND David Barna (David_Barna@nps.gov) (They sent IDENTICAL letters to those writing):


Thank you for sharing your concerns with me about the design of the
Flight 93 National Memorial. You can be assured that the National Park
Service (NPS) is committed to a national memorial that conveys the full honor
due to the heroes of Flight 93, building the memorial, and continuing to
commemorate those heroes who lost their lives on September 11, 2001.


This response has two parts. The first part describes the process used
to select the memorial design, the people and groups involved in the
decision-making, and the steps the National Park Service took when concerns
were first raised about the design. The second part is an attachment, a
letter sent on November 9, 2007 to Congressman Tancredo from the Families
of Flight 93. The group seeks to honor their loved ones--the people lost
on the flight--and their letter describes their pain and the view that
blogger Alec Rawls presents "preposterous opinions that the designer and
design are Muslim or Islamist conspirators who seek to memorialize
murderers. Nothing could be more offensive to the Families whose loved
ones died so that folks like Mr. Rawls can be free to expel such hurtful
and unsubstantiated accusations."

The National Park Service is aware of concerns about the memorial design
and took steps last year to investigate the issue. In doing so, the NPS
consulted with university and religious scholars, all of whom concluded
that the memorial design does not imply or depict religious iconography. In
light of those findings, the National Park Service and all three of its
partner organizations continue to support the final design for the Flight
93 memorial.

It may be helpful to understand the partners and the design selection
process. Four organizations partnered to organize and implement the process
for choosing a memorial design. The Families of Flight 93 is a nonprofit
organization of family members of the passengers and crew who died on the
flight. The Flight 93 Advisory Commission was created by Congress to
prepare a report containing recommendations for the planning, design,
construction, and long-term management of a permanent memorial at the crash
site. The Flight 93 Memorial Task Force serves as the Commission's
operational arm and includes Flight 93 family members, community members,
first responders, educators, and other local, regional, and national
stakeholders. The National Park Service is the federal agency charged with
administering Flight 93 National Memorial.

These four partner organizations agreed that an open design competition
would be the most inclusive, transparent, and democratic way to explore a
range of designs for the memorial. The competition was open to design
professionals, as well as to the public, and was conducted in two stages
with two separate juries. The stage I jury analyzed approximately 1,000
submissions and forwarded five finalist designs to the stage II jury. The
five finalist designs were exhibited for public comment in Somerset,
Pennsylvania
, and on the project website. The stage II jury, which was
composed of noted design professionals, Flight 93 family members, and
community leaders, reviewed the public comments and evaluated the designs
against the memorial's mission statement. By a majority, the stage II jury
voted in favor of Mr. Murdoch's design and then, to reinforce their support
of the design, took a second, unanimous vote to support the design created
by Mr. Murdoch.

After the winning design was announced, the NPS received some inquiries
from the public about what they perceived as Islamic symbolism in the
memorial design. While the architect, Mr. Murdoch, had not intended any
such symbolism in the design, he nonetheless refined aspects of the design
in response to the perceptions.

The most prominent refinement was in the treatment of the naturally
occurring bowl-shaped landscape feature. The design now surrounds that area
with a circle of trees which is broken in two places--the location which
marks the flight path as it breaks the circular continuity of the bowl
edge, and the Sacred Ground where the crash occurred. The locations of the
two breaks in the circle are based on the flight path and crash site of
Flight 93.

Letter from the Families of Flight 93 to Congressman Tancredo (11-09-07):
(See attached file: FLNI Families of Fl 93 Ltr to Congressman Tancredo
11-09-07.doc)

Additional information can be found on the park web site: www.nps.gov/flni.
I thank you for your interest in the project.

Joanne M. Hanley, General Superintendent
National Parks of Western Pennsylvania
Allegheny Portage RR NHS, Flight 93 National Memorial, Fort Necessity
National Battlefield, Friendship Hill NHS, Johnstown Flood National
Memorial
109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501
office: 814.443.4557
fax: 814.443.2180

David Barna
Director of Public Affairs
National Park Service
Washington, DC

Here is the letter she references to Congressman Tancredo:

November 9, 2007

The Honorable Tom Tancredo
U.S. House of Representatives
1131 Longworth HOB
Washington, DC 20515 Dear Congressman Tancredo:

It is with deep regret that the Families of Flight 93 recently learned of your letter to NPS Director Mary Bomar that has been posted on several websites. Especially unfortunate was to see your unquestioned support of the conspiracy theorist, Alec Rawls. Mr. Rawls continues to disseminate misinformation, twist facts, and incite emotional furor over the Flight 93 Memorial design based on supposed patriotic grounds. Mr. Rawls has perpetrated a complete fabrication that the memorial design represents an Islamic crescent, and he has distorted drawings and orientation of the memorial to suit his most unpatriotic and self-serving purposes.

Former NPS Director Mainella reported to you in October 2005 that changes to the design would be made. Indeed, the perceived crescent shape was shortly thereafter extended more completely into a circle to alleviate any further misinterpretation of the site plan graphic. The circle, a symbol of unity, is symbolically broken in two places – where the flight path of the plane entered the “bowl” topography, and at the crash site itself. The entire design is referred to as “The Flight 93 National Memorial.” Unfortunately, Mr. Rawls refuses to acknowledge these design alterations have been made. Instead, undaunted by the rational efforts of others to discuss these points with Mr. Rawls, he continues to focus his vehemence in various public media on the original crescent shape and to expound his equally preposterous opinions that the designer and design are Muslim or Islamist conspirators who seek to memorialize murderers. Nothing could be more offensive to the Families whose loved ones died so that folks like Mr. Rawls can be free to expel such hurtful and unsubstantiated accusations.

The Families of Flight 93 overwhelmingly support the design and the design process, and reaffirmed that support by a unanimous vote of the Board of Directors as recently as two months ago. Oddly, when Mr. Gordon Felt, Treasurer, Families of Flight 93 last spoke to you in October 2005, you had indicated that you would support the design as long as the Families were satisfied. We are so satisfied, and have repeatedly and steadfastly said so, and so we are puzzled by your new found trust of a self-serving conspiracy blogger who does not represent the opinions or interest of the Families in any way. Indeed, quite the opposite, as Mr. Rawls, in our opinion, undermines the integrity and honor of our loved ones who died on Flight 93. We are also disappointed that neither you, nor your staff, have sought to establish what our position is with regard to this matter. The previous trust we placed in your word to one of our officers is now in doubt, as we have not been afforded the opportunity to learn of your changed position except through the blog Mr. Rawls’ offers.

We do, however, continue to value your opinion, as we do for all regardless of whether they disagree with our support of the Memorial, or not. We also want to have your support, and so we extend to you our open-ended offer to have you visit the site at your earliest opportunity, talk with Families’ representatives while there, and learn of how this elegant, but simple, design fits the terrain and meets the stated design competition expectations, as well as those of the Families and our partners..

Additionally, enclosed for your use and further information is a “White Paper” prepared by the project partners that documents the tremendously open and inclusive process by which the design was selected, the background of Alec Rawls’ interference, the many opportunities and courtesies given to Mr. Rawls by the project partners to address his concerns, and his unwelcome overtures and veiled threats to the Families and the project, as well as a chart that counters Mr. Rawls’ claims with the hard facts. Also enclosed is a letter sent by Flight 93 Advisory Commission Chairman John J. Reynolds to Mr. Rawls, requesting that he stop his persistent harassment, intimidation, and slander of the project partners.

We hope you find these documents useful, and we thank you in advance for your continued support of the Families of Flight 93 organization in our quest to build this memorial and honor the actions and the memories of our lost loved ones.

Sincerely yours,
FAMILIES OF FLIGHT 93

Ed Root, President
Patrick White, Vice-President
Gordon Felt, Treasurer
Carole O’Hare, Secretary
Debby Borza, Director
Beverly Burnett, Director
Christine Fraser, Director
Esther Heyman, Director
Christine Homer, Director
Elizabeth Kemmerer, Director
Catherine Miller, Director
Ken Nacke, Director
Hamilton Peterson, Director
Allison Vadhan, Director

Now, I don’t know about you, nor do I know if you were consulted about this design. Everybody I know–those whom I informed of this and brought this to their attention–were frankly OUTRAGED at the religious iconography they blatantly deny. The only change made by the designer was to add a bunch of trees–the placement of the trees is the star area.

Do we really want our murdered men and women honored with a memorial honoring their murderers? I don’t think so. I certainly don’t. To continue to push this design is just like lighting the Empire State Building up in green to honor Eid–to honor the islamic murderers and appease them at the end of the month of ramadan.

The original article, complete with contact links is here. Let your voices be heard. It’s time to say enough is enough–our tax dollars are being used to appease these monsters with special footbaths, prayer rooms and cafeterias at our federally funded colleges; we have taxi drivers in Minnesota refusing to accomodate Americans because of THEIR religion–and it’s okay; Minnesota’s congressman Keith Ellison works hand in hand with the terrorist front group CAIR and has made statements he will do all he can to force islam on America; our children are being indoctrinated into the religion of hate in school; Christmas is spat upon but there’s no end to appeasing islamics. Separation of church and state should go for ALL faiths, not just Judeo Christian. I refuse to allow my children to be taught and indoctrinated into the islamic hate.

And this memorial? It’s not a memorial to the men and women murdered on Flight 93–it’s a memorial to the murderers of those men and women, a memorial to the ones who murdered Americans without regard to age, gender or reason–not to the Americans who saved the Pentagon by taking the plane down when they realized what was happening.

And these planners think we’re completely blind and stupid, that we can’t see the crescent of embrace in the design, even to the color.

Are you going to let them continue to do this? Are you going to sit idly by while these planners force the religious iconography glorifying the murderers of Flight 93 down your throats? Are you going to continue to allow this political correctness garbage continue to infect this country?

Why are Barna and Hanley stubbornly set upon honoring the murderers rather than the murdered American heroes? That’s the real question–and I say follow the money.

Let your voice be heard. Follow the links and email your letters. Contacts are here.

Stop the ACLU! Weekly Roundup 11/11-11/17/2007


Some excellent articles and videos once again from Jay at Stop the ACLU! I’m going to include Jay’s short synopsis with each link; it will give you an idea of what each article/video is about. This site is absolute MUST reading to keep America free from the nanny state/political correctness nonsense the left so badly wants to impose on the rest of us. Do yourself a favor–read these articles, visit Stop the ACLU! and learn to protect yourself from this cancer. What I publish here are only a few of the incredible articles at the site–spend time there and learn.

Articles:

Google FINALLY Recognizes Veteran’s Day
I guess after all those years of criticism, they deserve a pat on the back for finally doing the right thing. Also, please feel free to use this post like an open trackback to promote your own Veteran’s Day posts.

Nutroots Turn on Obama
Very interesting turn of events. Obama tells his very liberal plan of raising taxes to fix social security and the nutroots go beserk! Of course, social security is not in a crisis! This is only a lie from the rightwing and now Obama is helping spread the lie! It is classic nuttiness from the left as they slaughter their own.

Thompson Gains National Right to Life Endorsement?
It is still just a rumor, but a strong one with sources telling FOX news it is true. If it turns out to be so, it will be a big one for Fred Thompson to bag. It will turn up the heat on this race for sure!

ACLU and CAIR Team up to Fight Anti-Terror Efforts Again
The ACLU joins forces with CAIR to fight the LAPD’s effort to map Muslim communities, hoping to identify people who might be liable to succumb to extremism

Thanksgiving-A Time of Mourning
Its getting quite ridiculous with the attacks on holidays in the name of political correctness. Check out what the Seattle Public School Staff are being told about Thanksgiving!

PBS Telling Teachers to Violate First Amendment?
Airing on PBS tonight at 8 p.m. is “Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial”, a two hour documentary that tells the story of the Dover case. The ACLU are super-excited!

I won’t know how objective the documetary itself is until I watch it, however a recent move by PBS has one group up in arms:

A packet for educators issued by the Public Broadcasting System (PBS) in conjunction with the NOVA program “Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial” encourages teaching practices that are probably unconstitutional, a conservative organization stated on Tuesday.

“The NOVA/PBS teaching guide encourages the injection of religion into classroom teaching about evolution in a way that likely would violate current Supreme Court precedents about the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause,” said John West, vice president for public policy and legal affairs at the Discovery Institute, in a news release.

The 22-page document is a companion piece to the two-hour NOVA docudrama, “Judgment Day,” airing on most network affiliates Tuesday night. The film is about a trial concerning intelligent design that took place in Dover, Pa., in 2005.

The guide claims to provide teachers with “easily digestible information to guide and support you in facing challenges to evolution.”

In the booklet, teachers are instructed to use such discussion questions as: “Can you accept evolution and still believe in religion?” The answer to that query is provided as: “Yes. The common view that evolution is inherently antirelig

ious is simply false.”

All Military Components Meet, Exceed Recruiting Goals
Since the mainstream media are bound to either ignore or spin this some way, I thought that maybe a few blogs might help spread the news

The first month of fiscal 2008 was a success for all active and reserve military components.

In a meeting with Pentagon reporters today, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said all components met or exceeded their recruiting goals for October.

On the active-duty side, the Army made 101 percent of its goal of 4,500, with 4,564 recruits. The Navy made 100 percent of its goal of 2,788 recruits. The Marine Corps made 102 percent of its goal of 2,720, with 2,788 enlisting. The Air Force made 100 percent of its goal of 2,656.

Newsweek Taps Kos Founder, Markos “Screw ‘Em” Moulitsas, To cover Presidential Election
Hmmm..what media bias? Granted, he says they will announce someone to balance him that will make heads explode on their side. Regardless, its an interesting development.

PC Christmas: Santa’s Laugh Derogatory Towards Women?
I kid you not, “ho, ho, ho” is under attack!

Colorado Student Files Lawsuit Over Commencement Speech that Mentioned Jesus
More ACLU style PC garbage attacking religious expression from school students. Another brave student standing up to it!

9th Circuit Court Rejects Challenges to Warrantless Wiretaps
Please share this news with your readers! A suprise from the liberal 9th Circuit is a ruling that is actually in favor of the Bush administration and America! A ruling in favor of the NSA based on the secrecy defense. ACLU type moonbat heads are exploding everywhere.

Videos:

Hillary Was For Licenses For Illegals Before She Was Against Them
Flashbacks from 2004 election. Is it a requirement for Democrats to pick both sides and neither on important issues?

Boy Scouts Accused of Being Too Pro-War
Outrageous! A troop of Boy Scouts try to raise donations for the troops. Some liberal cries that the message is too pro-war. The city removes the donation boxes! I’ve got a report and video.

In regards to the above video regarding the Boy Scouts, Move America Forward also has information. Below is their action alert regarding this ridiculous idiocy.

An action alert from Move America Forward – www.MoveAmericaForward.org – please pass this on to others !

SHAME ON THIS WOMAN:

FOR SHUTING DOWN THE BOY SCOUTS

EFFORTS TO SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!

Meet Marsha Weinerman, a city official from Cambridge, Massachusetts.

She’s made news recently because she decided to shut down the Boy Scouts care package collection boxes. You see, the Boy Scouts were sending care packages for our troops to enjoy at the holidays. But Marsha Weinerman said the Boy Scouts actions are ‘too pro-war’ and ordered law enforcement to remove the care package collection boxes.

The Boy Scout’s troop leader is outraged:

We have never seen anything like this decision in Cambridge before,” Patterson wrote. The city is changing for the worse if decisions like this are allowed to be made.”

Contact Ms. Weinerman and let her know that it is our troops’ service that protects the rights of all Americans – including our freedom to vote:

mWeinerman@cambridgema.gov

Or call Ms. Weinerman’s office at:
(617) 349-4363


You can show up Ms. Weinerman and those opposed to our troops by sponsoring a Christmas/holiday care package for our troops – and we’ll be more than happy to send it over to Iraq and Afghanistan with love and appreciation:

http://www.thecampaignstore.com/store/default.asp?parentid=378

And here’s more on this story:

Melanie Morgan’s got more on the story here:

http://www.melaniemorgan.com/

Complete report at Move America Forward’s “Daily File Blog”

http://www.moveamericaforward.org/index.php/DailyFile/

Melanie Morgan also references this in her brand new WorldNetDaily column here:

http://www.wnd.com/news/archives.asp?AUTHOR_ID=269

And here are the media stories about Ms. Weinerman’s atrocious conduct:

http://www.breitbart.tv/html/8125.html

http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/homepage/x799506901

http://www.bostonmagazine.com/blogs/boston/2007/11/14/dont-ever-change-cambridge/

– The Staff of Move America Forward
http://www.MoveAmericaForward.org