Happy Global Orgasm Day

~Snooper~

I will be SO happy when this generation of idiots die off. This is indeed bizarre but, Hat Tip to Fox News.

Oui! Si! Da! Ja! Yes!

Any way you scream it, one group hopes you’l be having an orgasm in the name of world peace this Friday at 6:08 GMT.

At the exact moment of the winter solstice, the world is urged to get busy at the second annual Global Orgasm for World Peace.

People across the world – but especially in countries with “weapons of mass destruction and places where violence is used in place of medication” – are being asked to synchronize their orgasms, according to the group’s Web site.

This group session of sexual healing, aka The Big O, is designed to be an “instantaneous surge of human biological, mental and spiritual energy” that organizers hope will reduce levels of violence, hatred and fear around the world during this, the longest night of the year.

Global Orgasm is the brain child of Donna Sheehan and Paul Reffell, co-founders of the anti-war organization Baring Witness, a group of activists who strip to make public peace displays with their naked bodies.

We see how well it worked in ’06, correct? Idiot morons.

WHO? All Men and Women, you and everyone you know.

WHERE? Everywhere in the world, but especially in countries with weapons of mass destruction and places where violence is used in place of mediation.

WHEN? Solstice Day – December 22, at 06:08 Universal Time (GMT)

WHY? To effect positive change in the energy field of the Earth through input of the largest possible instantaneous surge of human biological, mental and spiritual energy.

Like I said…idiot morons.

Damn hippies.

Happy Global Orgasm Day

~Snooper~

I will be SO happy when this generation of idiots die off. This is indeed bizarre but, Hat Tip to Fox News.

Oui! Si! Da! Ja! Yes!

Any way you scream it, one group hopes you’l be having an orgasm in the name of world peace this Friday at 6:08 GMT.

At the exact moment of the winter solstice, the world is urged to get busy at the second annual Global Orgasm for World Peace.

People across the world – but especially in countries with “weapons of mass destruction and places where violence is used in place of medication” – are being asked to synchronize their orgasms, according to the group’s Web site.

This group session of sexual healing, aka The Big O, is designed to be an “instantaneous surge of human biological, mental and spiritual energy” that organizers hope will reduce levels of violence, hatred and fear around the world during this, the longest night of the year.

Global Orgasm is the brain child of Donna Sheehan and Paul Reffell, co-founders of the anti-war organization Baring Witness, a group of activists who strip to make public peace displays with their naked bodies.

We see how well it worked in ’06, correct? Idiot morons.

WHO? All Men and Women, you and everyone you know.

WHERE? Everywhere in the world, but especially in countries with weapons of mass destruction and places where violence is used in place of mediation.

WHEN? Solstice Day – December 22, at 06:08 Universal Time (GMT)

WHY? To effect positive change in the energy field of the Earth through input of the largest possible instantaneous surge of human biological, mental and spiritual energy.

Like I said…idiot morons.

Damn hippies.

Myth vs Fact-Part 183

Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “Allah welcomes two men with a smile; one of whom kills the other and both of them enter Paradise. One fights in Allah’s Cause and gets killed. Later on Allah forgives the ‘killer who also get martyred (In Allah’s Cause).”

Tafsir

Irrelevant Kerry Calls GWB Irrelevant

~Snooper~

I about spewed perfectly good coffee upon my screen when this popped up into the Reader.

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass) slammed the Bush administration on Wednesday for its reluctance to take bold action on climate change, but the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee added that the White House does not represent the view of the American people on the issue.

Kerry, who just returned from the climate negotiations in Bali, Indonesia, at which he represented Congress, criticized the Bush administration for standing in the way of a stronger agreement on the issue. The senator stated, however, that the opportunities of this White House to stand in the way of action are dwindling.

“The world needs to know: This White House doesn’t represent the American people today, and it cannot represent America’s policy beyond January 2009,” Kerry said, pointing to state and local efforts to address climate change.

“The reality is, the Bush White House is increasingly irrelevant to any future agreement,” the senator added in a speech at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Kerry said that, despite the administration’s efforts, the so-called “Bali roadmap” makes progress on the issue. […]

I guess this is one more prime example of the insignificance of this dunce…the once upon a time Presidential Aspirant. Thank God he lost. Pot? Meet Kettle. Moron.

The Myth of Global Warming and the promoters of that Myth are the insignificant ones and the irrelevant ones.

Get over it. We have articles here and here revealing the Myth of Global Warming. Kerry is merely falling for a chance to Bash Bush due to the lethality of BDS.

Irrelevant Kerry Calls GWB Irrelevant

~Snooper~

I about spewed perfectly good coffee upon my screen when this popped up into the Reader.

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass) slammed the Bush administration on Wednesday for its reluctance to take bold action on climate change, but the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee added that the White House does not represent the view of the American people on the issue.

Kerry, who just returned from the climate negotiations in Bali, Indonesia, at which he represented Congress, criticized the Bush administration for standing in the way of a stronger agreement on the issue. The senator stated, however, that the opportunities of this White House to stand in the way of action are dwindling.

“The world needs to know: This White House doesn’t represent the American people today, and it cannot represent America’s policy beyond January 2009,” Kerry said, pointing to state and local efforts to address climate change.

“The reality is, the Bush White House is increasingly irrelevant to any future agreement,” the senator added in a speech at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Kerry said that, despite the administration’s efforts, the so-called “Bali roadmap” makes progress on the issue. […]

I guess this is one more prime example of the insignificance of this dunce…the once upon a time Presidential Aspirant. Thank God he lost. Pot? Meet Kettle. Moron.

The Myth of Global Warming and the promoters of that Myth are the insignificant ones and the irrelevant ones.

Get over it. We have articles here and here revealing the Myth of Global Warming. Kerry is merely falling for a chance to Bash Bush due to the lethality of BDS.

The Sins of the Lame Stream Media

~Snooper~

No matter the subject, there is always a “but”. Straight shooting reporting has as all but vanished from the pages and screens of the once Main Stream Media. No, longer do we hear the “straight skinny” on any story unless the object of the story or, the subject of the story is hated or at a minimum, disliked for whatever reason. Gone are the once “worshiped” Ethics of Journalism: I will place the preamble in this post and will include the headings for the rest.

Preamble
Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility. Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society’s principles and standards of practice.

Seek Truth and Report It

Minimize Harm

Act Independently

Be Accountable

In all areas, the alleged Main Stream Media sorely fails in all regards.

In these modern times of instant gratification and information at our fingertips, there is no viable explanation as to why whenever there is good news to report, it goes largely ignored in the hopes that it will be over-shadowed by any amount of bad news which can be scrounged up.

[…] Why is it that the Democrats ad the MSM won’t acknowledge this? Could it be that they have a vested interest in losing? The MSM, because that is how they have sold it, and the Democrats, because that is how they got elected…Both the MSM and the Democrats worked in tandem to get the message out: We will not be successful in Iraq. When evidence points to the contrary, silence, or people who should have remained silent or fired. When will this cone of silence be lifted? Could this be what Kristol was talking about? […]

There are thousands of examples of the Lame Stream being “Rather” lame in their reporting. It stems from never having to be pressured to report the Real Deal. It stems from never having to be accountable to anyone before The New Media came into being.

NBC still chirps to the tune of their moppets that Iraq is still in a civil war. I guess they don’t know what the definition of a civil war “IS”. Go here for a piece I wrote some time ago. Therein, one will find the exact definitions of “civil war”.

There never seems to be a balance in the current and modern day stories. It seems the once Main Stream dwell upon and wallow in negativities and a “woe is me” aura. We all know that there is Bad News as well as Good News. What is the harm in printing or airing both? Printing or airing one side to any story certainly violates the Ethics of Journalism. It leads one to believe that a prerequisite to be a journalist is to be unethical, biased and perform slanted reporting…just like our very own CONgress.

This sickness in the media isn’t limited to the American Media…not by a long shot. The Guardian rarely if ever gets any story right the first time…just like TNR. Remember TNR?

Ray Robison says Good News from Iraq gets mauled by the NYT on a regular basis. Why is that? What harm is there to report on the Good News? What journalistic gravitas is there to dwell on Bad News and negativity? Isn’t negativity against the mantra of Political Correctness?

Lynn Davidson reports on the incredulous Dishonest Journalists Award. Why does this even have to be? If journalists would be journalists and not the mouth pieces for their moppets, topics as this need not be.

The ethics of journalism has become the unethical misrepresentation of truth, justice and the American Way…at least here in the States. As I said earlier, unethical journalism isn’t limited to the United States…it takes place in Canada as well.

Atlas Shrugs claims that the disease of journalistic ethical nose-dive into lies, deceit and more lies, is due to BDS. The nose-dive is also due to “former MSM” types forming “independent” leftist blogs. Some journalists so-called are very much and deeply invested in defeat for America due to their hatred of what this country stands for. If they don’t like this country and what she stands for, I am with Mike Ditka…get the hell out and don’t let the door hit you on the ass on your way out. Stop trying to change the country to suit your desires and wants when the majority of Americans demand the Traditional America to remain in tact.

Thank God for the milbloggers.

There is no viable reason and/or cause for the News Media to NOT talk and/or write or report on Iraq because the news is too good. This is an unethical practice and it infuriates me to no end and the old adage of “Bad news sells” is no longer acceptable. The only ones, or so it seems, that love to hear the bad news for America are the old hippies that haven’t died off yet.

The LATimes committed an atrocity against the United States in regards to Military Families and the story was shown to be false…no apologies or retractions came forward. That was a clear violation of the Ethics of Journalism.

I have written extensively on this subject and it still never ceases to amaze me how many people tell me that such and such is so and true because it is in the newspaper on the evening news shows. We have shown that the vast majority of the journalists so-called give “liberally” to the DNC and their writings bolster that party time and time again…another clear violation of the Ethics of Journalism. I don’t care who they give to…just report fairly and without the editorializing within the reports.

More journalistic insanity here, here, here, here, and here.

The Sins of the Lame Stream Media

~Snooper~

No matter the subject, there is always a “but”. Straight shooting reporting has as all but vanished from the pages and screens of the once Main Stream Media. No, longer do we hear the “straight skinny” on any story unless the object of the story or, the subject of the story is hated or at a minimum, disliked for whatever reason. Gone are the once “worshiped” Ethics of Journalism: I will place the preamble in this post and will include the headings for the rest.

Preamble
Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility. Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society’s principles and standards of practice.

Seek Truth and Report It

Minimize Harm

Act Independently

Be Accountable

In all areas, the alleged Main Stream Media sorely fails in all regards.

In these modern times of instant gratification and information at our fingertips, there is no viable explanation as to why whenever there is good news to report, it goes largely ignored in the hopes that it will be over-shadowed by any amount of bad news which can be scrounged up.

[…] Why is it that the Democrats ad the MSM won’t acknowledge this? Could it be that they have a vested interest in losing? The MSM, because that is how they have sold it, and the Democrats, because that is how they got elected…Both the MSM and the Democrats worked in tandem to get the message out: We will not be successful in Iraq. When evidence points to the contrary, silence, or people who should have remained silent or fired. When will this cone of silence be lifted? Could this be what Kristol was talking about? […]

There are thousands of examples of the Lame Stream being “Rather” lame in their reporting. It stems from never having to be pressured to report the Real Deal. It stems from never having to be accountable to anyone before The New Media came into being.

NBC still chirps to the tune of their moppets that Iraq is still in a civil war. I guess they don’t know what the definition of a civil war “IS”. Go here for a piece I wrote some time ago. Therein, one will find the exact definitions of “civil war”.

There never seems to be a balance in the current and modern day stories. It seems the once Main Stream dwell upon and wallow in negativities and a “woe is me” aura. We all know that there is Bad News as well as Good News. What is the harm in printing or airing both? Printing or airing one side to any story certainly violates the Ethics of Journalism. It leads one to believe that a prerequisite to be a journalist is to be unethical, biased and perform slanted reporting…just like our very own CONgress.

This sickness in the media isn’t limited to the American Media…not by a long shot. The Guardian rarely if ever gets any story right the first time…just like TNR. Remember TNR?

Ray Robison says Good News from Iraq gets mauled by the NYT on a regular basis. Why is that? What harm is there to report on the Good News? What journalistic gravitas is there to dwell on Bad News and negativity? Isn’t negativity against the mantra of Political Correctness?

Lynn Davidson reports on the incredulous Dishonest Journalists Award. Why does this even have to be? If journalists would be journalists and not the mouth pieces for their moppets, topics as this need not be.

The ethics of journalism has become the unethical misrepresentation of truth, justice and the American Way…at least here in the States. As I said earlier, unethical journalism isn’t limited to the United States…it takes place in Canada as well.

Atlas Shrugs claims that the disease of journalistic ethical nose-dive into lies, deceit and more lies, is due to BDS. The nose-dive is also due to “former MSM” types forming “independent” leftist blogs. Some journalists so-called are very much and deeply invested in defeat for America due to their hatred of what this country stands for. If they don’t like this country and what she stands for, I am with Mike Ditka…get the hell out and don’t let the door hit you on the ass on your way out. Stop trying to change the country to suit your desires and wants when the majority of Americans demand the Traditional America to remain in tact.

Thank God for the milbloggers.

There is no viable reason and/or cause for the News Media to NOT talk and/or write or report on Iraq because the news is too good. This is an unethical practice and it infuriates me to no end and the old adage of “Bad news sells” is no longer acceptable. The only ones, or so it seems, that love to hear the bad news for America are the old hippies that haven’t died off yet.

The LATimes committed an atrocity against the United States in regards to Military Families and the story was shown to be false…no apologies or retractions came forward. That was a clear violation of the Ethics of Journalism.

I have written extensively on this subject and it still never ceases to amaze me how many people tell me that such and such is so and true because it is in the newspaper on the evening news shows. We have shown that the vast majority of the journalists so-called give “liberally” to the DNC and their writings bolster that party time and time again…another clear violation of the Ethics of Journalism. I don’t care who they give to…just report fairly and without the editorializing within the reports.

More journalistic insanity here, here, here, here, and here.

REPUBLICANS APPEAR IN BETTER SHAPE THAN EVEN I THOUGHT

It is no secret that I hate the Democratic party with the depth of 20 oceans and the white, hot intensity of a thousand suns. Smarmy, sociopathic, traitorous, lying bottom feeders. That being said, I do pride myself on objectivity in my prognosticating and that has led to an amazing rate of accuracy. In the last 15 years, my singular miss was 2006 and that was by a mere few thousand votes out of 80+ million. Simply stated, I am a legend. I don’t mind saying so.


Scanning the polls, I remain cautiously optimistic that, as long as we don’t muff it by nominating a boob like Rudy Giuilliani, the GOP stands a good chance of holding the White House. This is particularly true with a rapidly improving Iraq situation.


Nevertheless, there are some problem areas. Yet, they may not be quite as problematic as I thought.


In winning 2008, I pretty much thought we would have to turn Michigan or Pennsylvania because we appeared to be toast in Ohio. This amazing polling show that the leading Dems are not exactly setting the world afire in the Buckeye State.


If the Dems can’t beat us in Ohio, they can’t beat us. Bank it. That is just a fact.

~The Mighty SonlitKnight

SING IT FRED BARNES

~Snooper~

An astonishing turnaround occurred in the Senate onTuesday: 70 senators voted to fund the Iraq war with a fresh $70 billion and no strings attached. Think about this a moment. Last winter, after Democrats captured the Senate and House, it seemed likely they’d succeed in limiting or ending the Iraq war, probably by setting a firm timetable for withdrawal of American troops. After all, both President Bush and the war itself were highly unpopular. The Democratic triumph in the election made that clear, even to those who doubted opinion polls. And Democrats made the anti-Iraq crusade their top priority in the new Congress. Now, the 70-vote approval of the war by the Senate represents the breathtaking dimension of their failure.

link



SING IT FRED BARNES

~Snooper~

An astonishing turnaround occurred in the Senate onTuesday: 70 senators voted to fund the Iraq war with a fresh $70 billion and no strings attached. Think about this a moment. Last winter, after Democrats captured the Senate and House, it seemed likely they’d succeed in limiting or ending the Iraq war, probably by setting a firm timetable for withdrawal of American troops. After all, both President Bush and the war itself were highly unpopular. The Democratic triumph in the election made that clear, even to those who doubted opinion polls. And Democrats made the anti-Iraq crusade their top priority in the new Congress. Now, the 70-vote approval of the war by the Senate represents the breathtaking dimension of their failure.

link