A Salary For The First Lady?

Cross posted by Findalis of Monkey in the Middle

The First Lady is the unofficial title of the hostess of the White House. Because this position is traditionally filled by the wife of the President of the United States, the title is sometimes taken to apply only to the wife of a sitting President. However, several women who were not Presidents’ wives have served as First Lady, as when the President was a bachelor or widower, or when the wife of the President was unable to fulfill the duties of the First Lady herself. In these cases, the position has been filled by a female relative or friend of the President.

To date, no woman has served as President. While a female President could theoretically serve as her own official hostess, it is not known what title would be applied to a President’s husband, who might also serve as the host of the White House. There have been many female governors of U.S. states over the years; their husbands are typically referred to as the First Gentleman.

Like any other spouse of an important man, the First Lady is an offshoot of her husband’s role. She has been many things in history. A promoter of values, a confidant, another set of eyes and ears for the President, or even did nothing (Bess Truman was famous for this one). Her role is as large or as small as she wants it to be. She is considered the head of Washington society and an invitation to an event at the White House was the pinnacle of one’s status in society.

The first lady is not an elected position, carries no official duties, and receives no salary. Nonetheless, she attends many official ceremonies and functions of state either along with, or in place of, the President. There is a strong tradition against the First Lady holding outside employment while occupying the office. The first lady frequently participates in humanitarian and charitable work; over the course of the 20th century it became increasingly common for first ladies to select specific causes to promote, usually ones that are not politically divisive. It is common for the first lady to hire a staff to support these activities. This role is not even mentioned once in the Constitution nor in any Federal law mandating this role.

This role has been an unpaid position until now.

Is CNN Pushing Kids to Ask For a Salary for First Lady Michelle?

CNN has a segment that they call “CNN Student News” that is supposed to highlight the news of the day for the kiddie set. Pursuant to that, in a December 15 segment, CNN floats a question asking if Michelle Obama (or any First Lady) should get a government salary just for being First Lady?

But, what we really ended up with is a slight to those same students to whom CNN was ostensibly relating the news. No where in the report was there any talk of the Constitution in particular nor the law in general as the CNN anchor cajoled the kids into viewing with awe the “work” of the First Lady and in fostering in them a feeling that First Ladies should be paid for this “work.”

CNN did not stress that a First Lady has no official role and no elected mandate to spend the public’s money on whatever cause she so chooses to expound upon — though a brief quote from Laura Bush that a First Lady “is not an office holder” was included at the end of the segment.

Apparently voting federal officials into office so that they may legally spend money from the public treasury is a concept that CNN doesn’t think kids need to know about.

Naturally we are treated to another claim of Michelle Obama being a “powerhouse in her own right” in emulation of Hillary’s once smartest-woman-in-the-world style of hagiography. The kids are asked why we shouldn’t pay the newest smartest woman in the world just for having said “I do” to her husband?

Full Story

Why is CNN pushing this now? Why not 8 years ago or even 20 years ago? Can this really be the idea of CNN or is this coming from Camp Obama? I suspect that the Obama administration is trying to push this idea on the American people in a hope that they can scam extra money from the American taxpayer into their coffers. After all she and hubby only make a combined income of $481,000 a year. Yet they can’t afford piano lessons, sports lessons, dance class and summer camp for their daughters. So scamming the American people for a hundred thousand or more dollars would be ok for them. Or they can just cut down their expenses. Instead of a fancy and expensive private school, they can opt for the free public schools in the area (that would be putting money where their mouth is). Instead of the fancy music and dance lessons, they can send their girls to the YMCA. Many parents do. Or the Boys and Girls Club. A local church group would do nicely too. There are many ways that these 2 smart people can afford to give their children a good future. But making the US Taxpayer pay for it is not right. It is just a scam to gain extra money for doing nothing more than saying I Do and sleeping with a man. And that is just plain wrong!

Advertisements

Children of Iraq

And THIS is why we are in Iraq..H/T to Yankeemom. Enjoy!!!

And then there is this. “Our bad ass military showing their softer side.” THAT’S the title of these videos on My Pet Jawa, which is where Yankeemom got them. No commentary from me needed.

In the Arms of Our Angels

God bless all our troops!

*and if you go over to Assoluta Tranquillita, you’ll find a bonus video. Just sayin’*

Quit Aiding Our Enemies!

An email from UN Watch brought the details I have been seeking about passage of the current defamation/censorship resolution which was recently passed by the General Assembly: Combating defamation of religion(A/C.3/63/L.22/Rev.1) .

The following listed states voted for the resolution; against our right of free expression:

  • Afghanistan
  • Algeria
  • Angola\Antigua and Barbuda
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bahamas
  • Bahrain
  • Bangladesh
  • Barbados
  • Belarus
  • Bhutan
  • Bolivia
  • Brunei
  • Darussalam
  • Cambodia
  • China
  • Comoros
  • Côte d’Ivoire
  • Cuba
  • Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
  • Djibouti
  • Dominica
  • Egypt
  • El Salvador
  • Eritrea
  • Ethiopia
  • Fiji
  • Gabon
  • Gambia
  • Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Guyana
  • Honduras
  • Indonesia
  • Iran, Iraq
  • Jamaica
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
  • Lebanon
  • LesothoLibya
  • Malaysia
  • Maldives
  • Mali
  • Mauritania
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • Myanmar
  • Namibia
  • Nicaragua
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Oman
  • Pakistan
  • Philippines
  • Qatar
  • Russia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Senegal
  • Sierra Leone
  • Singapore
  • Somalia
  • South Africa
  • Sri Lanka
  • Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Swaziland
  • Syria
  • Tajikistan
  • Thailand
  • Togo
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Turkmenistan
  • Uganda
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Uzbekistan
  • Venezuela
  • Viet Nam
  • Yemen
  • Zimbabwe.

The above listed states are enemies of liberty and human rights; not our friends nor allies. They should not be trusted, neither should they be benefiting directly from our tax money. Cut them off!!!

The following listed states abstained from voting:

  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Benin
  • Botswana
  • Brazil
  • Burkina Faso
  • Burundi
  • Central African Republic
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • Congo
  • Costa Rica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Ecuador
  • Ghana
  • Grenada
  • Guatemala
  • Haiti
  • India
  • Japan
  • Kenya
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Mauritius
  • Mexico
  • Mongolia
  • Nauru
  • Nepal
  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Rwanda
  • Saint Lucia
  • Timor-Leste
  • Tonga
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Tuvalu
  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Uruguay
  • Vanuatu
  • Zambia.

By not voting against the resolution, these abstainers effectively voted for it, allowing it to pass. Lets review what they voted to support: supression of free speech about the evil mission, doctrines & practices of Moe’s Murder Cult.

Expressing concern at the increase in racist violence and xenophobic ideas in
many parts of the world, in political circles, in the sphere of public opinion and in
society at large, as a result, inter alia, of the resurgence of activities of political
parties and associations established on the basis of racist, xenophobic and
ideological superiority platforms and charters, and the persistent use of those
platforms and charters to promote or incite racist ideologies,

Always bear this fact in mind: these corrupt politicians, masquerading as statesmen, conflate justified opposition to Moe’s Murder Cult with racism. Recall this excrement from the Durban II Draft.

26. Note that As regards the debate of contemporary forms of racism, some of the most worrying trends since 2001 include racio-religious profiling and discrimination, defamation of Muslims, their faith and beliefs, incitement to religious hatred and its concomitant effects on multiculturalism, national and international peace and stability as well as human rights of the affected communities.

The Qur’an exemplifies everything they bitterly bitch about. Nay more! It declares perpetual war upon us! Has none of those corrupt tyrants read Surah Al-Taubah 29? Has none of them read Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of that verse: The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah ? Has none of them read Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9?

Deeply alarmed at the rising trends towards discrimination based on religion
or belief, including in some national policies, laws and administrative measures that
stigmatize groups of people belonging to certain religions and beliefs under a
variety of pretexts relating to security and illegal immigration, thereby legitimizing
discrimination against them, and consequently impairing their enjoyment of the
right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and impeding their ability to
observe, practise and manifest their religion freely and without fear of coercion,
violence or reprisal,

How many synagogues are there in Saudi Arabia; how many churches? Why? Is it legal to build churches in Egypt? What legal restrictions are imposed upon conquered Jews & Christians by Sharia? Do you know? Do you give a damn?
Reliance of the Traveller , Book O, Chapter 11.1-11.11 will make it clear to anyone who doubts. Their rank hypocrisy shines & stinks like a dead carp on the river bank. Who can see or smell it?

Do you comprehend the fact that observing, practising & manifesting Islam involves genocidal aggression, casting terror, killing men, raping their widows and selling their orphans into slavery? Do you give a damn? Why the Hell not? Does the premature & unnecessary death of 80 million Hindus, 1.5 million Armenians or 750 thousand Assyrians mean nothing to you? How about the hundreds of children slaughtered at Beslan? Do you care about the thousands so recently slaughtered in New York City in Allah’s accursed name? Are you human? Is there any moral justification for your continued existence?

What do these words mean? What texts did Ibn Kathir use to source them? What do those texts say? Ibn Kathir quotes them. Do you have the courage to read them and learn or are you a soulless zombie?

Who gave those orders? Who proclaimed that ‘good news’?

Stressing that defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity
leading to the illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents and
incitement to religious hatred and violence,

What does Allah say about Jews & Christians in his book? Who are the sons of ‘apes and swine’; ‘worst of living creatures’? Who did Allah curse? Upon whom will he send tormentors to humiliate them until Resurrection Day? Is that defamation? Relegating Jesus to the role of Allah’s slave; is that defamation? Assigning Jesus the role of genocidal warmonger; is that defamation? Declaring war upon us until we are subjugated and pay extortion; barring public processions & prayers, ringing bells & displaying crosses; is that illicit restriction? Declaring that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims; is that a trifling affront to human dignity? But the UN does not give a damn about them; their only concern is that we might expose these facts about Islam; that we might demand effective protection from Islamic aggression.

Expresses deep concern at the negative stereotyping of religions and
manifestations of intolerance and discrimination in matters of religion or belief still
evident in the world;

That paragraph relates to association of Islam with Jihad & terrorism, which is well founded in Islamic scripture, tradition & history.

Notes with deep concern the intensification of the overall campaign of
defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, including the
ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic
events of 11 September 2001;

They don’t give a damn about the slaughter perpetrated by Muslims acting in Allah’s in emulation of Moe. No, they are deeply concerned that we might carefully observe young Muslim males acting suspiciously or entering the country. Get a clue for Chrissake!

Recognizes that, in the context of the fight against terrorism, defamation
of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, become aggravating
factors that contribute to the denial of fundamental rights and freedoms of members
of target groups, as well as their economic and social exclusion;

Is there any right more fundamental than the right to live in peace, undisturbed by conquest, terrorism & rapine? Is there any right more fundamental than the right to name and accurately describe the doctrines, mission and practices of an enemy which is hellbent on our destruction?

Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and
wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

Who the Hell made any such association? Could it be Allah? Could it be Moe? The lips through which those words passed first osculated Satan’s anus.

  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.
  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Exactly who the Hell associated Islam with violence & terror? It wasn’t Geert Wilders. It wasn’t Robert Spencer. It wasn’t me. Who was it?!!

Reiterates the commitment of all States to the implementation, in an integrated manner, of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which was adopted without a vote by the General Assembly on 8 September 200612 and reaffirmed by the Assembly in its resolution 62/272 of 5 September 2008, and which clearly confirms, inter alia, that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, stressing the need to reinforce the international community’s commitment to promote a culture of peace, justice and human development, ethnic, national and religious tolerance, and respect for all religions, religious values, beliefs or cultures and prevent the defamation of religions;

Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, established & exemplified by:

Deplores the use of the print, audio-visual and electronic media,
including the Internet, and any other means to incite acts of violence, xenophobia or
related intolerance and discrimination against any religion, as well as targeting of
religious symbols;

Exactly what are they bitching about? This blog post and others like it. Also FITNA, the brief video created by Geert Wilders. Examine what Ban Ki-moon said about FITNA.

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

Fitna merely quotes the Qur’an & hadith and shows Imams preaching that crap, followed by the inevitable results. The Secretary General labels that ‘hate speech’.

Emphasizes that, as stipulated in international human rights law,
everyone has the right to hold opinions without interference, and has the right to
freedom of expression, the exercise of which carries with it special duties and
responsibilities and may therefore be subject to limitations as are provided for by
law and are necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, protection of
national security or of public order, public health or morals;

Was there a duty, in 1938, to keep silent about the mission & doctrines of the German National Socialist Party? Should anyone attempting to expose Hitler’s agenda of conquest & slaughter have been imprisoned for his efforts? Is there any good reason, when enemy agents have murdered our fellow citizens and threaten to repeat the act on a greater scale, for us to keep silent about the identity and character of the enemy which slaughtered thousands?

President Bush describes Islam as a great religion of peace hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists. Allah said “fight them”. Allah established making a great slaughter as a prerequisite for admission to Paradise. Allah purchased the lives & property of Muslims so that they fight in his cause, kill and are killed for which they receive admission to Paradise. Moe said that he was “ordered to fight”; that he was “made victorious with terror”. The states listed above voted to criminalize the revelation of these fatal facts of Islam. They voted to demand the passage & enforcement of legislation that would prohibit this blog post and the publishing of FITNA.

Reaffirms the obligation of all States to enact the necessary legislation to
prohibit the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence
, and encourages States, in their
follow-up to the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination,
Xenophobia and Related Intolerance,7 to include aspects relating to national or
ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities in their national plans of action and, in
this context, to take forms of multiple discrimination against minorities fully into
account;

Recall what Ban Ki-Moon said about FITNA.

Urges all States to provide, within their respective legal and
constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination,
intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions, and incitement to
religious hatred in general, to take all possible measures to promote tolerance and
respect for all religions and beliefs
and the understanding of their value systems and
to complement legal systems with intellectual and moral strategies to combat
religious hatred and intolerance;

How could anyone with a scintilla of residual morality promote tolerance of and respect for Moe’s Murder Cult; the ultimate proponent of intolerance? How the Hell can we promote understanding of Islam’s value systems without reading and discussing its canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence?

Islam is a war machine wearing the uniform of religion as a camouflage. If we are to be prosecuted & persecuted for revealing that fact, then we will be led, dumb like sheep, to the slaughter.

Please send an email to your Representative & Senators, demanding that foreign aid be cut off from the nations above listed, who voted to contravene our first amendment right of free expression. Congress.org makes it easy to send an email by filling out a simple form. You can include a link to this blog post in your email by copying and pasting the following text.

Quit Aiding Our Enemies!

That way, you won’t need to type in the list of inimical states, the congressional staffers can click the link and get it from this post.

Related posts:

Quit Aiding Our Enemies!

An email from UN Watch brought the details I have been seeking about passage of the current defamation/censorship resolution which was recently passed by the General Assembly: Combating defamation of religion(A/C.3/63/L.22/Rev.1) .

The following listed states voted for the resolution; against our right of free expression:

  • Afghanistan
  • Algeria
  • Angola\Antigua and Barbuda
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bahamas
  • Bahrain
  • Bangladesh
  • Barbados
  • Belarus
  • Bhutan
  • Bolivia
  • Brunei
  • Darussalam
  • Cambodia
  • China
  • Comoros
  • Côte d’Ivoire
  • Cuba
  • Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
  • Djibouti
  • Dominica
  • Egypt
  • El Salvador
  • Eritrea
  • Ethiopia
  • Fiji
  • Gabon
  • Gambia
  • Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Guyana
  • Honduras
  • Indonesia
  • Iran, Iraq
  • Jamaica
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
  • Lebanon
  • LesothoLibya
  • Malaysia
  • Maldives
  • Mali
  • Mauritania
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • Myanmar
  • Namibia
  • Nicaragua
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Oman
  • Pakistan
  • Philippines
  • Qatar
  • Russia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Senegal
  • Sierra Leone
  • Singapore
  • Somalia
  • South Africa
  • Sri Lanka
  • Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Swaziland
  • Syria
  • Tajikistan
  • Thailand
  • Togo
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Turkmenistan
  • Uganda
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Uzbekistan
  • Venezuela
  • Viet Nam
  • Yemen
  • Zimbabwe.

The above listed states are enemies of liberty and human rights; not our friends nor allies. They should not be trusted, neither should they be benefiting directly from our tax money. Cut them off!!!

The following listed states abstained from voting:

  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Benin
  • Botswana
  • Brazil
  • Burkina Faso
  • Burundi
  • Central African Republic
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • Congo
  • Costa Rica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Ecuador
  • Ghana
  • Grenada
  • Guatemala
  • Haiti
  • India
  • Japan
  • Kenya
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Mauritius
  • Mexico
  • Mongolia
  • Nauru
  • Nepal
  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Rwanda
  • Saint Lucia
  • Timor-Leste
  • Tonga
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Tuvalu
  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Uruguay
  • Vanuatu
  • Zambia.

By not voting against the resolution, these abstainers effectively voted for it, allowing it to pass. Lets review what they voted to support: supression of free speech about the evil mission, doctrines & practices of Moe’s Murder Cult.

Expressing concern at the increase in racist violence and xenophobic ideas in
many parts of the world, in political circles, in the sphere of public opinion and in
society at large, as a result, inter alia, of the resurgence of activities of political
parties and associations established on the basis of racist, xenophobic and
ideological superiority platforms and charters, and the persistent use of those
platforms and charters to promote or incite racist ideologies,

Always bear this fact in mind: these corrupt politicians, masquerading as statesmen, conflate justified opposition to Moe’s Murder Cult with racism. Recall this excrement from the Durban II Draft.

26. Note that As regards the debate of contemporary forms of racism, some of the most worrying trends since 2001 include racio-religious profiling and discrimination, defamation of Muslims, their faith and beliefs, incitement to religious hatred and its concomitant effects on multiculturalism, national and international peace and stability as well as human rights of the affected communities.

The Qur’an exemplifies everything they bitterly bitch about. Nay more! It declares perpetual war upon us! Has none of those corrupt tyrants read Surah Al-Taubah 29? Has none of them read Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of that verse: The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah ? Has none of them read Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9?

Deeply alarmed at the rising trends towards discrimination based on religion
or belief, including in some national policies, laws and administrative measures that
stigmatize groups of people belonging to certain religions and beliefs under a
variety of pretexts relating to security and illegal immigration, thereby legitimizing
discrimination against them, and consequently impairing their enjoyment of the
right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and impeding their ability to
observe, practise and manifest their religion freely and without fear of coercion,
violence or reprisal,

How many synagogues are there in Saudi Arabia; how many churches? Why? Is it legal to build churches in Egypt? What legal restrictions are imposed upon conquered Jews & Christians by Sharia? Do you know? Do you give a damn?
Reliance of the Traveller , Book O, Chapter 11.1-11.11 will make it clear to anyone who doubts. Their rank hypocrisy shines & stinks like a dead carp on the river bank. Who can see or smell it?

Do you comprehend the fact that observing, practising & manifesting Islam involves genocidal aggression, casting terror, killing men, raping their widows and selling their orphans into slavery? Do you give a damn? Why the Hell not? Does the premature & unnecessary death of 80 million Hindus, 1.5 million Armenians or 750 thousand Assyrians mean nothing to you? How about the hundreds of children slaughtered at Beslan? Do you care about the thousands so recently slaughtered in New York City in Allah’s accursed name? Are you human? Is there any moral justification for your continued existence?

What do these words mean? What texts did Ibn Kathir use to source them? What do those texts say? Ibn Kathir quotes them. Do you have the courage to read them and learn or are you a soulless zombie?

Who gave those orders? Who proclaimed that ‘good news’?

Stressing that defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity
leading to the illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents and
incitement to religious hatred and violence,

What does Allah say about Jews & Christians in his book? Who are the sons of ‘apes and swine’; ‘worst of living creatures’? Who did Allah curse? Upon whom will he send tormentors to humiliate them until Resurrection Day? Is that defamation? Relegating Jesus to the role of Allah’s slave; is that defamation? Assigning Jesus the role of genocidal warmonger; is that defamation? Declaring war upon us until we are subjugated and pay extortion; barring public processions & prayers, ringing bells & displaying crosses; is that illicit restriction? Declaring that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims; is that a trifling affront to human dignity? But the UN does not give a damn about them; their only concern is that we might expose these facts about Islam; that we might demand effective protection from Islamic aggression.

Expresses deep concern at the negative stereotyping of religions and
manifestations of intolerance and discrimination in matters of religion or belief still
evident in the world;

That paragraph relates to association of Islam with Jihad & terrorism, which is well founded in Islamic scripture, tradition & history.

Notes with deep concern the intensification of the overall campaign of
defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, including the
ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic
events of 11 September 2001;

They don’t give a damn about the slaughter perpetrated by Muslims acting in Allah’s in emulation of Moe. No, they are deeply concerned that we might carefully observe young Muslim males acting suspiciously or entering the country. Get a clue for Chrissake!

Recognizes that, in the context of the fight against terrorism, defamation
of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, become aggravating
factors that contribute to the denial of fundamental rights and freedoms of members
of target groups, as well as their economic and social exclusion;

Is there any right more fundamental than the right to live in peace, undisturbed by conquest, terrorism & rapine? Is there any right more fundamental than the right to name and accurately describe the doctrines, mission and practices of an enemy which is hellbent on our destruction?

Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and
wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

Who the Hell made any such association? Could it be Allah? Could it be Moe? The lips through which those words passed first osculated Satan’s anus.

  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.
  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Exactly who the Hell associated Islam with violence & terror? It wasn’t Geert Wilders. It wasn’t Robert Spencer. It wasn’t me. Who was it?!!

Reiterates the commitment of all States to the implementation, in an integrated manner, of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which was adopted without a vote by the General Assembly on 8 September 200612 and reaffirmed by the Assembly in its resolution 62/272 of 5 September 2008, and which clearly confirms, inter alia, that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, stressing the need to reinforce the international community’s commitment to promote a culture of peace, justice and human development, ethnic, national and religious tolerance, and respect for all religions, religious values, beliefs or cultures and prevent the defamation of religions;

Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, established & exemplified by:

Deplores the use of the print, audio-visual and electronic media,
including the Internet, and any other means to incite acts of violence, xenophobia or
related intolerance and discrimination against any religion, as well as targeting of
religious symbols;

Exactly what are they bitching about? This blog post and others like it. Also FITNA, the brief video created by Geert Wilders. Examine what Ban Ki-moon said about FITNA.

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

Fitna merely quotes the Qur’an & hadith and shows Imams preaching that crap, followed by the inevitable results. The Secretary General labels that ‘hate speech’.

Emphasizes that, as stipulated in international human rights law,
everyone has the right to hold opinions without interference, and has the right to
freedom of expression, the exercise of which carries with it special duties and
responsibilities and may therefore be subject to limitations as are provided for by
law and are necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, protection of
national security or of public order, public health or morals;

Was there a duty, in 1938, to keep silent about the mission & doctrines of the German National Socialist Party? Should anyone attempting to expose Hitler’s agenda of conquest & slaughter have been imprisoned for his efforts? Is there any good reason, when enemy agents have murdered our fellow citizens and threaten to repeat the act on a greater scale, for us to keep silent about the identity and character of the enemy which slaughtered thousands?

President Bush describes Islam as a great religion of peace hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists. Allah said “fight them”. Allah established making a great slaughter as a prerequisite for admission to Paradise. Allah purchased the lives & property of Muslims so that they fight in his cause, kill and are killed for which they receive admission to Paradise. Moe said that he was “ordered to fight”; that he was “made victorious with terror”. The states listed above voted to criminalize the revelation of these fatal facts of Islam. They voted to demand the passage & enforcement of legislation that would prohibit this blog post and the publishing of FITNA.

Reaffirms the obligation of all States to enact the necessary legislation to
prohibit the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence
, and encourages States, in their
follow-up to the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination,
Xenophobia and Related Intolerance,7 to include aspects relating to national or
ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities in their national plans of action and, in
this context, to take forms of multiple discrimination against minorities fully into
account;

Recall what Ban Ki-Moon said about FITNA.

Urges all States to provide, within their respective legal and
constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination,
intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions, and incitement to
religious hatred in general, to take all possible measures to promote tolerance and
respect for all religions and beliefs
and the understanding of their value systems and
to complement legal systems with intellectual and moral strategies to combat
religious hatred and intolerance;

How could anyone with a scintilla of residual morality promote tolerance of and respect for Moe’s Murder Cult; the ultimate proponent of intolerance? How the Hell can we promote understanding of Islam’s value systems without reading and discussing its canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence?

Islam is a war machine wearing the uniform of religion as a camouflage. If we are to be prosecuted & persecuted for revealing that fact, then we will be led, dumb like sheep, to the slaughter.

Please send an email to your Representative & Senators, demanding that foreign aid be cut off from the nations above listed, who voted to contravene our first amendment right of free expression. Congress.org makes it easy to send an email by filling out a simple form. You can include a link to this blog post in your email by copying and pasting the following text.

Quit Aiding Our Enemies!

That way, you won’t need to type in the list of inimical states, the congressional staffers can click the link and get it from this post.

Related posts:

Wisdom Worth Sharing

Israel National News carried one of the best articles I have read in recent months. Victor Sharpe gets it.

Humiliation is Thy Name
by Victor Sharpe
Humiliation gives way to annihilation.

The farce that was the truce between Hamas and Israel was always a lie. The three politicians, whom the Israeli people endure, bought into a deceptive Arab ploy that any schoolchild could see for what it was.

How many times must it be restated that no Muslim entity, especially Hamas, will ever honor any agreement made with non-Muslims. It is in the Koran for all to see, except, of course, those who lead Israel and choose not to see. Again, the Jewish state is humiliated.

Did he read “Victory: the Path to Peace” or “Another Call to Feed Israel to the Alligators“, or did he, as I presume, reach his conclusion independently? In either case, Victor Sharpe’s clearly expressed wisdom should be widely shared.