Ad Hoc Cmte: Non-Paper

On December 5, 2008, there was issued, on the letterhead of the High Commissioner For Human Rights, by Ambassador Idriss Jazairy, President of the Ad Hoc Committee on Complementary Standards, a “Non-Paper Paper” and a cover letter explaining its purpose. [Emphasis & links added.]
[Due to the use of OCR to extract quotes from scanned document images, there will be some spelling errors and a few Anglicized words will be Americanized. ]

The purpose of this “Non paper” is to stimulate a constructive debate on the content and the framework of major areas of vulnerability which for reasons of substance and/or of procedure suffer from protection gaps. Some of these areas are related to the contemporary manifestations of racism, ~ racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.The purpose of this “Non-paper” is also to invite concrete responses and recommendations based on its content.

The Ambassador set forth the Non Paper’s terms of reference.

  • Paragraph 199 of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action that recommended to the Commission on Human Rights, now replaced by the Human Rights Council, to elaborate complementary intenational standards aimed at strengthening and updating international instruments against all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.
  • Decision 3/IO3 of the Human Rights Council that decides, in pursuance of decision and instruction of the 2001 World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance to establish an Ad Hoc Committee of the Human Rights Council with the mandate to elaborate, as a matter of priority and necessity, complementary standards in the form of either a convention or additional protocol (s) to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racism, racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and related Intolerance that will ill the existing gaps in the Convention and also provide new normative texts aimed at combating all forms of contemporary racism, including incitement to racial and religious hatred.
  • Resolution 6/21 of the Human Rights Council on the elaboration of new international complementary standards to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

The following listed phrases are critical because they are encoded to conceal the true intentions of the committee.

  • all forms of racism
  • related intolerance
  • incitement to racial and religious hatred

We must always bear in mind how the United Nations twist the English language!!! The following quote is from Preliminary document of the African Regional Conference Preparatory to the Durban Review Conference [Emphasis added.]

4. Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;

Islamophobia = racism!!!

The Ambassador directed the member states to keep in mind::

all views expressed and contributions made within the framework of the follow-up mechanisms of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, including:

  • The survey of the five experts on the nature and the scope of substantive gaps, with regard to issues of content in the existing international instruments to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance (A/HRC/4/W G.3/ 6) ;
  • The document of the Committee on the Elimination of racial discrimination on possible measures to strengthen the implementation of the final observations by adopting new recommendations by updating its monitoring procedures (All-IRC/4/WG.3/7)
  • The responses provided by the Committee ou the Elimination of racial discrimination to the questionnaire by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights pursuant to decision PC.1/ 10 of the Preparatory Committee of the Durban Review Conference (A/CON’F.2l1/PC.2/CRP.5) including the relevant points of view made by the Members ofthe Committee on behalf ofthe latter; ~
  • The Report of the 5th session of the Intergovernmental Working Group on the Effective implementation of the Durban Conference and Prcgrarnmc of Action (A/HCR/6/10) and all relevant recommendations and conclusions adopted by this Group since its creation, particularly those contained in document(AH.CR/AC.!/I/CRP.2);
  • The discussions that took place during the first session of the Ad hoc Committee on complementary standards, held from 18 to 2l February 2008.

The Ambassador lists the following revelations from the two previous sessions.

  • There is global collective agreement and commitment expressed during the 2001 World Conference against racism on the principle of claborating international complementary standards to strengthen and update the international instruments against all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance (para 199 of the Durban Programme of Action);
  • However, no consensus was reached on how the specific form of/manner of giving concrete expression to this commiuncnt in priciple;
  • We must also bear in mind the ensuing debate on the links between articles 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on civil and political rights and the expert meeting of 2 and 3 October 2008, whereafter it was reiterated that the fundamental right of freedom of expression is compatible with the prohibition of any call for national, racial or religious hatred which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence;
  • It is thus imperative to reach the largest possible agreement, through the Ad hoc Committee on complementary standards, on concrete ways and means to implement the commitment in principle made: during the 2001 World Conference against racism.
  • The approach suggested to achieve this goal is to stimulate, in a positive and inclusive spirit, concrete proposals on the fields and themes laid out in the “Non paper” for which complementary standardized provisions or other measures designed to fill protection gaps, are necessary.

Of course, the revelations repeat certain code phrases.

  • all forms of racism
  • related intolerance

Next, we encounter a reference to ICCPR.

  • the fundamental right of freedom of expression is compatible with the prohibition of any call for national, racial or religious hatred which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence

Muslims, liars, lawyers & U.N. bureaucrats do not use words the way normal people do. “call for national, racial or religious hatred which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence” means any criticism of Islam, specifically the Danish Cartoons & Fitna. In this context, it is asserted that censorship of criticism of Islam does not interfere with freedom of expression.

The Non-Paper begins with a listing of its Purpose, scope and parameters:

  • Implementing paragraph 199 of the Programme of Action of the World Conference against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, in which the Conference “Rec0Recommends that the Commission on Human Rights prepare complementary international standards
  • to strengthen and update international instruments against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance in all their aspects”, as well as the relevant Human Rights Council resolutions, in particular decision 3/103 .
  • The need to enhance efforts to counter contemporary and emerging forms of manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.
  • The need to strengthen the monitoring procedures of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination with a view to enable it to undertake the responsibilities entrusted to it in a more effective manner.
  • The need to address double or multiple discrimination a continuing source of concern, as it affects certain individuals and groups, in particular gender-related racial discrimination and double discrimination on the grounds of race and religion.
  • The imperative to ensure that measures to combat terrorism respect the fundamental principles and the universally recognized standards of international law, international human rights law and international humanitarian Law.
  • The urgency of addressing racial profiling and eliminating it as a pervasive form of discrimination.
  • The need for uniform and consistent application of the law at the national and international levels to ensure the effectiveness of international efforts to counter racism and racial discrimination.
  • The need to recognize that The prohibition of the dissemination of all ideas based upon racial superiority or hatred and the prohibition of incitement to national, racial -· or religious hatred are compatible with the freedom of opinion and expression.
  • The principle of regarding provocative portrayals of objects of religious veneration as a malicious violation of the spirit of tolerance which must also be a feature of democratic society.
  • The need to re-emphasize that the prohibition of publication of material with the aim of protecting the rights of others and against seriously or gratuitously offensive attacks on matters regarded as sacred by the followers of any religion is a legitimate State objective.
  • The need for national and international law to provide adequate legal responses to propaganda of a racist and xenophobia nature committed through computer systems.
  • The need to follow the growing trend in many States to include, in their criminal I legislation, offenses in which religious motives are an aggravating factor.

Once again, the code phrases rear their ugly heads.

  • related intolerance = Islamophobia = any criticism of Islam.
  • contemporary and emerging forms of manifestations of racism = Islamophobia = any criticism of Islam.
  • measures to combat terrorism respect the fundamental principles and the universally recognized standards of intemational law, international human rights law and international humanitarian Law. This is a direct attack on surveillance of young Muslim males, such as the “magnificent 19” and other perpetrators of mass casualty attacks. Suspicion of Muslims = “racial profiling”:.
  • racial profiling
  • The need to recognize that The prohibition of the dissemination of all ideas based upon racial superiority or hatred and the prohibition of incitement to national, racial -· or religious hatred are compatible with the freedom of opinion and expression. A repetition of the egregious attack upon free speech. The reference is to the Danish Cartoons and Fitna.
  • provocative portrayals of objects of religious veneration as a malicious violation of the spirit of tolerance This is another reference to the Danish Cartoons.
  • The need to re-emphasize that the prohibition of publication of material with the aim of protecting the rights of others and against seriously or gratuitously offensive attacks on matters regarded as sacred by the followers of any religion is a legitimate State objective. Refer to the quotes from Reliance of the Traveller in the initial post of this series.
  • propaganda of a racist and xenophobia nature committed through computer systems. This is an attack upon blog posts and web sites which expose Islam’s damnable doctrines.

Eight specific themes are listed, here is #3.

3- Terrorism, racial discrimination and racial profiling:

  1. A definition of racial profiling, prioritizing human rights protection, could be elaborated and agreed upon.
  2. States must ensure that measures to combat terrorism do not discriminate, in purpose or effect on ·grounds of race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin, as well as on religious grounds, bearing in mind in this context the intersectionality between racial and religious discrimination.
  3. Profiling based on stereotypes founded on grounds of discrimination prohibited by international law, including on racial, ethnic and/or religious grounds must be prohibited by law.

Who practices terrorism? Are the majority of terror attacks perpetrated by little old ladies from Iceland? Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, established as such by 3:151, 8:12., 8:60, 33:26, 59:2 & 59:13. When you hear hoof beats, they probably come from horses, not from unicorns. Profiling according to current trends in the identity of perpetrators is common sense. Islam is acting through the UN to disarm us.

The fifth listed theme gets down to detail.

5- Incitement to racial, national and religious hatred

  1. There is a need for further clarifying and reinforcing at the international level existing obligations on the eradication of all incitement to hatred and ‘ discrimination in any form and to prohibit by law, propaganda for war and advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.
  2. In this context, complementary standards to be developed should observe the following parameters:
    • Article 4 of ICERD shall be extended to the crime of incitement to racial hatred covering offenses motivated by religious hatred against immigrant communities.
    • The protection provided shall extend to all individuals and groups within the jurisdiction of the State Party.
    • The prohibitions shall equally cover acts committed by any individual, group or organization, including political and media organizations as well as by national or local public authorities.
    • The provisions shall apply to any act which, in purpose or effect, incites discrimination, hostility or violence.
    • In order to achieve consistent and uniform application and maximize protection for actual or potential victims, any doubt as to the existence of a causal link between an act of incitement and the likelihood of a violation, or the threshold required for reaching such a determination, shall be interpreted in a consistent and coherent manner at the national and international levels so as to ensure appropriate protection of the concerned individuals or groups.
    • Addressing acts constituting incitement shall apply whether such acts have aims which are internal or external to the State concerned.
    • Requisite standards would explicitly not prohibit advocacy of the sovereign right to self-defence or the right of peoples to self-determination and independence in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
    • Requisite complementary standards shall include the prohibition of publication of material that direct seriously offensive attacks on matters regarded by followers of any religion or belief as sacred or inherent to their dignity as human beings, with the aim of protecting them against such attacks.
  3. In line with the above parameters, States’ general obligations would include:
    • Undertaking to promulgate, where they do not exist, a specific legislation prohibiting any propaganda for war and any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.
    • Asserting, in the relevant specific legislation, that such propaganda and advocacy are contrary to public policy.
    • Providing for appropriate sanction, including of a criminal nature, in case of violation.

The listed item under sub section c would appear to be straightforward. It is not. Muslims, liars, lawyers and U.N. Bureaucrats do not use the English language to communicate, they use it to deceive! In evidence whereof I cite the egregious remarks of the Secretary General on the subject of Fitna, the short documentary by Girt Wielders.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

Fitna does not incite violence, it documents incitement contained in the Qur’an and propagated by Imams in their Mosques

The program of the Ad Hoc Committee runs parallel to the programs of the General Assembly and Human Rights Council in their resolutions combating “defamation of religion” and that of the Durban II review conference. Those programs are documented in detail and their egregious hypocrisy exposed and documented in the following listed blog posts..

Ad Hoc Cmte: Iranian Submission

Outline for the Ad Hoc Committee on Complementary Standards Consultations

An additional mechanism, the Ad Hoc Committee on Complementary Standards was created by the Human Rights Council in 2006 to fill gaps in CERD, and to provide new normative standards aimed at combating all forms of contemporary aspects of racism.

The committee’s mission is to write new international legislation to criminalize criticism of Islam. They solicited suggestions from the member nations to get the process started.

The Iranian submission begins on page 12 of the pdf. and ends on page 17. Although capturing the attitude & meaning of the document through excerpts is not satisfactory, I will not reproduce the entire five page submission here. You can click through to the pdf file and enter 12 in the page window to go directly to the full text of the submission.

The pdf is a scanned document, requiring the use of ocr to cull excerpts. Unfortunately, the printer which created the document needs a head cleaning, and the plate on which it was scanned is dusty, so that ocr was extremely difficult. I have therefore run the spelling checker on the excerpts, they may deviate slightly from the original, but care has been taken to avoid changing the meaning of the text. [Emphasis added.]

The Iranian submission is not novel, it rehashes malicious malarkey from previous resolutions. The following documents were referenced in the text.

They are off to a fast start in their Introduction, asserting that Islamophobia is a growing trend, becoming pervasive and often officially condoned.

The growing trend of defamation of religions is arising from the following factors: the conflation of race, culture and religion, concept of clash of civilizations and religions, all these provides fertile soil for the defamation of religions.
And also on the fight against terrorism, based on defense of national identity and security, it is reduced to religious
dimension.

Note the clause which I emphasized. Who is it that conflates race with religion? If you can’t answer that question, re-read the initial post in this series :
Ad Hoc Committee on Complementary Standards, paying close attention to the quote from the report of the African Regional Conference in preparation for the Durban Review.

Unfortunately, insults and intolerance against Islam are being provided intellectual justification by Western scholars
and political lobbies who espouse anti-Islamic agendas, hence lending support to ideological violence against
Muslims. Sophisticated slogans are used to provoke systematic insults against Islam. This phenomenon reflects
the Islarnophobia which afflicts segments of western society.

This paragraph inverts cause and effect. We developed anti-Islamic agendas precisely because of Islam’s anti-Christian & anti-western doctrines, agendas & actions. Our accurate descriptions of Islamic doctrines & practices are labled insults and intolerance. Accurate and well documented descriptions of Islamic sanctification & mandate of genocidal conquest and terrorism are labled “insults” and “intolerance”.
The last paragraph of the introduction is severely overloaded by implicit reference to the documents listed and linked above.

Lack of action to prevent the reprinting of blasphemous caricatures, and indifference in airing the inflammatory documentary against the holy Quran will be perceived as manifestation of insincerity towards the principles and objectives of various efforts within the United Nations system aiming at promoting understanding and respect among cultures and civilizations. [Links added.]

It should now be clear to you that the Iranian agenda includes criminalizing criticism of Islam, specifically the Danish Cartoons and Geert Wilders’ Fitna.

The cartoons depict Muhammad as a terrorist, which, by his own admission, he was. He never threw a bomb, because explosives were invented after he died. he used the primitive weaponry available in the seventh century to terrorize his victims with ruthless slaughter. If you do not comprehend this fact, open your Qur’an to 33:26, 59:2 & 59:13 and read them carefully.

Fitna demonstrates the obvious connection between Islamic doctrine enshrined in the Qur’an. This fact is documented in another blog post. It is extremely unlikely that anyone else will reveal to you the source of Islam’s intense determination to criminalize criticism of itself. I will: It comes from Islamic law, codified in Reliance of the Traveller. Book O, which treats of “Justice”, includes an outline of the conditions imposed upon dhimmis, who were “people of the book” subjugated by Muslims under a “treaty of protection”. Chapter 11.10 lists five acts which violate the treaty of protection and subject the dhimmi to immediate execution. Here is the fifth item in that list.

-5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

The perceptive reader will want to know what is impermissible to mention. O8.7 lists 20 items which entail apostasy, and describes the list as nearly endless. Here are a few relevant items from that list.

-1- to prostrate to an idol, whether sarcastically, out of mere contrariness, or in actual conviction, like that of someone who believes the Creator to be something that has originated in time. Like idols in this respect are the sun or moon, and like prostration is bowing to other than Allah, if one intends reverence towards it like the reverence due to Allah;

-2- to intend to commit unbelief, even if in the future. And like this intention is hesitating whether to do so or not: one thereby immediately commits unbelief;

-3- to speak words that imply unbelief such as “Allah is the third of three,” or “I am Allah”-unless one’s tongue has run away with one, or one is quoting another, or is one of the friends of Allah Most High (wali, def: w33) in a spiritually intoxicated state of total oblivion (A: friend of Allah or not, someone totally oblivious is as if insane, and is not held legally responsible (dis: k13.1(O:) ) ), for these latter do not entail unbelief;

-4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);

-5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

-6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

-14- to deny the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims (ijma`, def: B7) is part of Islam, when it is well known as such, like the prayer (salat) or even one rak’a from one of the five obligatory prayers, if there is no excuse (def: u2.4);

-15- to hold that any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;

(n: `Ala’ al-din’ Abidin adds the following:

-16- to revile the religion of Islam;

-17- to believe that things in themselves or by their own nature have any causal influence independent of the will of Allah;

-18- to deny the existence of angels or jinn (def: w22), or the heavens;

-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

-20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala’iyya (y4), 423-24). )

By now you must be wondering about the penalty. Islamic law has that covered, too.

O8.1

When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

O8.2

In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

Islamic law is clear on its face: any criticism of Allah or his Messenger gets you killed. The Ad Hoc Committee On Complementary Standards is only the latest tool developed in pursuit of that objective.

Under the heading of “Legal Aspects”, Iran describes the cartoons & Fitna as “inconsistent with the spirit of the UN Charter” and various resolutions.

The elimination of discrimination and the protection against Intolerance is in part a matter of legal protection.

They jabber on with quotes about universal freedom, equality and dignity, without finding anything relevant to the matter at hand. The next paragraph is mired in excrement.

Crucially, according to- article 20, paragraph.2 of the ICCPR, ” any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law” This provision represents a clear limitation to-the night to fee speech which according to article 19 of the ICCPR carries with it special duties and responsibilities.

The cartoons do not advocate hatred, nor do they incite discrimination, hostility or violence. The same is true of Fitna. Few will perceive the irony in Islam’s specious assertion: it is their own scripture, tradition & jurisprudence which advocates hatred and incites violence. If Article 20 were to be enforced, the Qur’an, hadith & Shari’ah would be banned as incitement to violence!

The committee on civil and Political Rights in its general comment 11 provided that these required prohibitions are fully compatible with the right to freedom of expression as contained in Article 19, the exercise of which carries with it special duties and responsibilities. This is clear indication that human rights instruments recognize provisions against incitement to religions hatred as being a completely legitimate- safeguard against the abuse of the right to free speech.

Iran is asserting that accurately describing Allah’s genocidal Jihad imperatives which are found in Surahs Al-Anfal & At-Taubah and confirmed in Sahih Bukhari’s Books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition and codified in Reliance of the Traveller Book O, Chapter 9, Paragraphs 8 & 9 must be legally prohibited as “incitement to religious hatred”. Islamic obedience to those imperatives has resulted in 270*106 premature deaths in the last 1400 years but we must be prevented, by judicial penalties, from mentioning it.

Identifying the enemy and describing his doctrines is characterized as an abuse of free speech. This is nothing less than the aggressor’s program for depriving us of the ability to defend ourselves against his aggression.

The last section of the submission is under the heading of Programme of Action.

In sum, the right to freedom of expression should be exercised with the responsibilities and limitations as prescribed by law. The international community should initiate a global dialogue to promote a culture of tolerance and peace based on respect for human rights and cultural diversity and urges states, NGOs, religious bodies and media to support and promote such a dialogue. Developing the human rights language to address emerging issues such as defamation of religions was an important step forward that is of interest not only to Muslims but to all the internatioual community.

Our freedom of expression must not include mention of Islam’s aggressive doctrines & practices: conquest, genocide & terrorism. A culture of tolerance and peace means being led, dumb like sheep, to the slaughter.

Islamic Republic of Iran urges the Ad hoc Committee on the elaboration of complementary standards to call upon the States to stop the publication of blasphemous caricatures, Elms and media as well as the campaigns for anti-Islamic regulations to take all possible legal and administrative measures to prevent continuation of these deliberate offensive acts, which impinge greatly on the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion of the followers of Islam.

They want to add wording to ICERD to criminalize every criticism of Islam. How in Hell does anything we write or say impinge on the liberty of Muslims? Why must they be allowed to continue in the arrogant assumption that they have a divine right and mission to kill, enslave, rape, pillage & plunder us?

The High Commissioner’s Big Lie Part 2

A press release from Eye on the UN brought a new UN disinformation campaign to light: Anti-racism conference outcome document – what it actually says. [All font attributes in the quotations were added by the author for emphasis and clarity. All links within the quotations, with the exception of the quote from Wikipedia, were added by the author.]

Concerning “defamation of religion”, there were concerns that the outcome document would introduce such a concept and threaten freedom of expression. The document does no such thing.

It unequivocally reaffirms the positive role of freedom of expression in the fight against racism, while also deploring derogatory stereotyping and stigmatization of people based on their religion or belief, as manifested in Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, Christianophobia and anti-Arabism.

The outcome document also launches a process to examine how the prohibition of incitement to hatred, a well-established concept as reflected in Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, has been implemented in various parts of the world.

Prohibition of incitement to hatred & violence would require the banning of Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition & Jurisprudence.Since the UN and its appendant bodies are dominated by the OIC and its dhimmis & allies, such a ban will never happen.

The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) is to organize a series of expert workshops on the legislative patterns, judicial practices and national policies in the different regions of the world on the subject in order to assess the level of implementation of the prohibition of incitement.

It is true that “defamation of religion” does not occur in the text of the outcome document. But the demon is in the details.

12. Deplores the global rise and number of incidents of racial or religious intolerance and violence, including Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, Christianophobia and anti-Arabism manifested in particular by the derogatory stereotyping and stigmatization of persons based on their religion or belief; and in this regard urges all the UN Member States to implement paragraph 150 of the DDPA;

150. Calls upon States, in opposing all forms of racism, to recognize the need to
counter anti-Semitism, anti-Arabism and Islamophobia world-wide, and urges all States to take
effective measures to prevent the emergence of movements based on racism and discriminatory
ideas concerning these communities
;

13. Reaffirms that any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law; reaffirms further that all dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, incitement to racial discrimination as well as all acts of violence or incitement to such acts shall be declared offence punishable by law, in accordance with the international obligations of States and that these prohibitions are consistent with freedom of opinion and expression;

This statement: “advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement”, is not so narrowly construed as we are expected to assume. This fatal fact is established by the spew from the Secretary General in his irresponsible condemnation of Fitna, the short subject by Dutch M.P., Geert Wilders. Fitna juxtaposes verses of the Qur’an with their real world application from Kutbah to resulting riots. The video quotes Islam’s canon of scripture along with excerpts from video recordings of Kutbah and images of resulting riots. The only expressions of hatred or incitement contained therein are those of Islam’s demon and his acolytes. Read what Ban Ki-Moon said about it.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

According to the Secretary General, accurate quotation of the Qur’an is hate speech; accurately depicting Muslim clerics screaming for blood is incitement to violence, not protected by freedom of expression.

The draft of October 9 ’08 contained three insertions of “defamation of religion”. While the phrase was deleted, the intention of the authors remains unchanged.

The outcome document contains 79 references to “racism”. We must not ignore the implied meaning of that word. The following quote is from the Preliminary document of the African Regional Conference Preparatory to the Durban Review Conference [Emphasis added.]

4. Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;

The emphasized phrase conflates objections to Islam’s supremacism, triumphalism, aggression, genocide & terrorism with racism.

30. Welcomes the important role played by the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, and all other relevant special procedures and mechanisms in the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and calls on States to cooperate fully with these mechanisms;

A/HRC/7/19, the report submitted by Mr. Doudou Diène, Special Rapporteur 02/20/08 contains 7 references to “Islamophobia”

Efforts to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance are encountering a number of serious major challenges manifested by the following worrying trends, details of which are given in this report: erosion of the political will to combat racism and xenophobia, as shown by the non-implementation of the Durban Programme of Action; the resurgence of racist and xenophobic violence; the growing political trivialization of racism and xenophobia, demonstrated by the spread of racist and xenophobic political platforms and by their implementation through government alliances with democratic parties; the ideological, scientific and intellectual legitimization of racist and xenophobic discourse and rhetoric, which favours an ethnic or racial interpretation of social, economic and political problems and immigration; the general increase in manifestations of racial and religious hatred, and also religious intolerance, reflected in particular in manifestations of anti-Semitism and Christianophobia and, more especially, Islamophobia; and the increasing importance in identity constructs of a rejection of
diversity and resistance to the process of multiculturalization of societies. The Special Rapporteur devotes a chapter to discrimination based on caste, which he considers to be implicit in his mandate.

To reverse these worrying trends, the Special Rapporteur is continuing to promote, in all his activities, the development of a dual strategy: political and legal, on the one hand, aiming to arouse and strengthen the political will of Governments to combat racism and xenophobia and enabling States to acquire the legal and administrative instruments for this purpose, in line with the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action; and cultural, intellectual and ethical, on the other hand, targeting the root causes of those trends, in particular the value systems which legitimize them, the identity constructs – including the writing and teaching of history – which support them, and the rejection of diversity and multiculturalism which sustains them.

6. The growth of incitement to racial and religious hatred and the resurgence of manifestations of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia and, more particularly, Islamophobia are other particularly worrying trends. They can be attributed to the following: conflation of race, culture and religion; intellectual and ideological questioning of religion; the imbalance between the defence of secularism and respect for freedom of religion; and the supervisory and security-based approach to the practice and teaching of Islam. A particularly worrying element resulting from these developments is the selective and political interpretation of human rights and fundamental freedoms, manifested inter alia by the ideological pre-eminence of freedom of expression over the other freedoms, restrictions and limitations embodied in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

54. Throughout his term of office, the Special Rapporteur has highlighted one of the central causes of the resurgence of racism and its increasing complexity: the conflation of racial, cultural and religious factors. He has consequently paid special attention to the increase in anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and Christianophobia, and hostility to other spiritual and religious traditions. His most recent report on combating defamation of religions,11 which was submitted to the Human Rights Council at its sixth session, must be seen in the context of his earlier reports to the Commission on Human Rights on the situation of Muslim and Arab peoples in various parts of the world, in which he stressed the violence and attacks targeted on their places of worship,
cultural centres, businesses and property following the events of 11 September 2001.12 His report entitled “Defamation of religions and global efforts to combat racism: anti-Semitism, Christianophobia and Islamophobia”13 confirms this worrying trend.

One quote stands out like a sore toe; lets face it directly.

A particularly worrying element resulting from these developments is the selective and political interpretation of human rights and fundamental freedoms, manifested inter alia by the ideological pre-eminence of freedom of expression over the other freedoms, restrictions and limitations embodied in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Doudou Diène let the snake out of the bag. The authors welcome his important role. The sentence quoted above crystallizes the central concept of the document. Contrary to the dishonest statement of High Commissioner Navi Pillay the outcome document places heavy emphasis on restricting freedom of expression.

28. Reaffirms its call upon States to implement all commitments resulting from international and regional conferences in which they participated, and to formulate national policies and action plans to prevent, combat, and eradicate racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

“Racism and related intolerance” means “Islamophobia” which is a code word for any criticism of Islam. The resolution demands legislation to outlaw criticism of Islam.

39. Urges States parties to the Convention to withdraw reservations contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention and to consider withdrawing other reservations; [Link added.]

Wikipedia provides the arcane detail required to comprehend paragraph 39.

The U.S. has attached a reservation to its 1994 ratification of the treaty noting that specifically the treaty’s restrictions on freedom of speech and freedom of assembly were incompatible with the guarantees of such freedoms incorporated into the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.[20][21]

54. Reaffirms the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, as well as the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can play in combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, in line with relevant provisions of international human rights law, instruments, norms and standards;

58. Stresses that the right to freedom of opinion and expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of a democratic, pluralistic society and stresses further the role these rights can play in the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance worldwide;

Malicious malarkey!!! Malignant maundery!!! Refer to the disgusting execration of Ban Ki-Moon referenced above. The rightful role of freedom of expression in the fight against intolerance is the full and fully documented exposure of Islam’s intrinsic genocidal aggression. Geert Wilders exposed it with Fitna; I documented it with http://snooper.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/fitna-supporting-documentation/ .

56. Calls on States to take effective, tangible and comprehensive measures to prevent, combat and eradicate all forms and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

That is another thinly veiled demand for legislation to criminalize criticism of Islam.

68. Expresses its concern over the rise in recent years of acts of incitement to hatred, which have targeted and severely affected racial and religious communities and persons belonging to racial and religious minorities, whether involving the use of print, audio-visual or electronic media or any other means, and emanating from a variety of sources;

An obvious reference to Fitna and the Danish cartoons.

69. Resolves to, as stipulated in art. 20 of the ICCPR, fully and effectively prohibit any advocacy of national, racial, or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence and implement it through all necessary legislative, policy and judicial measures; [Link added.]

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.

Refer once again to Ban Ki-moon’s despicable defamation of Fitna previously quoted .

99. Calls upon States, in accordance with their human rights obligations, to declare illegal and to prohibit all organizations based on ideas or theories of superiority of one race or group of persons of one colour or ethnic origin, or which attempt to justify or promote national, racial and religious hatred and discrimination in any form, and to adopt immediate and positive measures designed to eradicate all incitement to, or acts of, such discrimination;

That is a thinly veiled attack upon the Belgian & Dutch Freedom parties because they oppose the Islamization of Europe.

121. Commends media organizations that have elaborated voluntary ethical codes of conduct aimed at, inter alia, meeting the goals defined in paragraph 144 of the Durban Programme of Action, and encourages consultations among media professionals through relevant associations and organizations at the national, regional and international levels, with the assistance of OHCHR, with a view to exchanging views on this subject and sharing best practices, taking into account the independence of the media and international human rights standards and norms;

144. Urges States and encourages the private sector to promote the development by the
media, including the print and electronic media, including the Internet
and advertising, taking
into account their independence, through their relevant associations and organizations at the
national, regional and international levels, of a voluntary ethical code of conduct and
self-regulatory measures, and of policies and practices aimed at:
(a) Combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;
(b) Promoting the fair, balanced and equitable representation of the diversity of their
societies, as well as ensuring that this diversity is reflected among their staff;
(c) Combating the proliferation of ideas of racial superiority, justification of racial
hatred and discrimination
in any form;
(d) Promoting respect, tolerance and understanding among all individuals, peoples,
nations and civilizations, for example through assistance in public awareness-raising campaigns;
(e) Avoiding stereotyping in all its forms, and particularly the promotion of false
images of migrants, including migrant workers, and refugees, in order to prevent the spread of
xenophobic sentiments among the public
and to encourage the objective and balanced portrayal
of people, events and history;

Paragraph 144 is an obvious demand for self-censorship; note the phrases to which I added emphasis.

134. Takes note of the proposal of the OHCHR, in cooperation with regional stakeholders in all parts of the world, to organize in light of the OHCHR Expert Seminar on the links between art. 19 and 20 of the ICCPR a series of expert workshops to attain a better understanding of the legislative patterns, judicial practices and national policies in the different regions of the world with regard to the concept of incitement to hatred, in order to assess the level of implementation of the prohibition of incitement, as stipulated in article 20 of the ICCPR, without prejudice to the mandate of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Complementary Standards;

What is the big deal about the “Ad Hoc Committee on the Complementary Standards”? Its report, of course. The committee generated a proposed protocol to be added to ICERD. The protocol would criminalize “defamation of religions”, as demanded by the OIC. I am unable at present to find the text of the proposal. These references hint at it. A/HRC/10/L.8, Press Release , Joint NGO Statement.

Remember that Fitna constitutes incitement, according to the Secretary General! The outcome document repeatedly demands criminalization of criticism of Islam. Navi Pillay’s assertion that the outcome document does not threaten freedom of expression is proved to be a malicious, malignant lie, obviously intended to disarm us as we seek to protect and preserve our constitutional rights. If we can not name and accurately describe the doctrines & practices of our enemy then, in the words of President Washington, …”then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter”.

The United Nations is a contributor to the problem, not part of the solution. Its leaders are liars, men and women with lofty titles and low morals. To Hell with it and with them! Instead of seeking a seat on the Orwellian UNHRC, the U.S.A. should withdraw from the UN and expel it and its appendant bodies from our territory.

Durban II: Revised; Reject it!

From Eye on the UN

Revised version of the technically reviewed text (A/CONF.211/PC/WG.2/CRP.2) submitted by the Chairperson-Rapporteur of the intersessional open-ended working group to continue and finalize the process of negotiations on and drafting of the outcome document (1/28/2009)

Reflecting the status of negotiations in the working group as at 6.00 pm, Friday, 23 January 2009.

Always bear in mind, while reading Durban II & related documents, their manipulation & degradation of our language.
The following quote is from Preliminary document of the African Regional Conference Preparatory to the Durban Review Conference [Emphasis added.]

4. Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;

Our language has been molested!!! anti-Semitism, Christianophobia & Islamophobia = racism ! Christianity & Islam are not races, they each include people of varying racial and geographic backgrounds. Hating a man on the basis of his skin color is irrational. Skin color is not a valid predictor of behavior and it is a genetic trait not under the control of the individual. A believing, practicing Christian, who follows the Golden Rule, is a threat to no one; there is no reason to hate him. A believing, practicing Muslim, is obligated to engage in war against pagans, Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians; our blood and property are not sacred to him, its open season! Fear of Islam is not irrational, it is intended,[3:151] [59:2] and is valid, based upon Islam’s history of violent expansion.

Whenever you read racism and / or related intolerance, substitute criticism of / resistance to Islam.

Readers are urged to sign up for issue updates from Eye on the UN, without which this writer would be unaware of the continuing development of the draft document. Subscribe here.

Key to the Draft Document from the update email.
Ed. Note: Square brackets mean not yet decided. Ad. ref. means ad referendum, or adopted pending agreement on the whole document. A cluster is a group of paragraphs. Para means paragraphs. DDPA is the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action adopted at the first Durban Conference in Durban, South Africa, September 8, 2001. Over the course of the week (January 19-23, 2009), the drafting committee considered only 40% of the document before them and agreed on approximately 20% of the provisions covered.

A/CONF.211/PC/WG.2/CRP.2
{Bold face & font color added for emphasis.}

1. [Emphasizes] the need to [identify/address all forms and] [eradicate all] manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance [in all parts of the world] [as identified in the DDPA, including contemporary manifestations], especially in light of developments and challenges that have occurred since the adoption of the DDPA [with a view to prevent,] and to combat [and eradicate] those manifestations wherever they occur;

The authors want the final document to emphasize the need to identify and eradicate all manifestations of criticism of and resistance to Islam.

3. [Affirms that the [effective implementation of the DDPA can contribute to combating racist and xenophobic trends] [failure to fully implement the DDPA [has contributed to] [would result in] the intensification of worrying racist and xenophobic trends,] including the political instrumentalization and intellectual legitimization of racism as well as racist violence;]

The authors are obviously striking out at the development of anti-Islamic political parties in Europe along with web sites that publish the fatal facts of Islamic doctrine & practice.

4. Notes the continued existence of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, and inequality in all spheres of human life, and non compliance with specific obligations in the promotion and protection of equality at the national, regional and international levels and reaffirms the obligation of States to take action in this respect; [Adopted ad ref.]

5. [Notes that other obstacles hampering progress in the collective struggle against racism and racial discrimination include [first and foremost the absence of political will, the denial of the existence of contemporary racist tendencies,] weak [national] legislation and policies, lack of effective strategies, [lack of political will,] lack of implementation of international legal framework and commitments, impunity on different grounds [ – including [[negative] abuse of] freedom of expression, [counter-terrorism, and national security] [stereotypical association of religion with terrorism and violence by the media and national security forces]– as well as an increase in extreme right wing xenophobic political platforms. Hence the need [arises] to deal with this menace in all its forms and manifestations with all available tools at our disposal];]

6. Underlines that racial discrimination condoned by governmental and state agencies, policies and practices violates human rights and may endanger friendly relations between peoples, cooperation among nations, and international peace and security; [Adopted ad ref.]

Paragraph 4 is an obvious veiled reference to legislation. That concept is reinforced in paragraph 5. Note this combination of expressions.

  • impunity on different grounds
  • [ – including [[negative] abuse of]
  • freedom of expression

The authors are bitching bitterly about the protection afforded to me and my fellow bloggers by the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits legislation abridging freedom of political speech. We have an absolute Constitutional right to tell the truth about Islam; its damnable doctrines and practices. We are God blessed well determined to preserve, protect & defend that right, which alone guarantees the continuation of our liberty. They are demanding legislation which would violate the first amendment by denying our right to accurately describe Islam. Accurate description of the enemy in time of war is an absolute necessity. Disproving denial of the enemy’s doctrines and the intentions founded thereon is an unacceptable threat to the war effort, which stands alone between our liberties and Islamic theocratic tyranny.

  • [counter-terrorism, and national security]

The authors are bitching bitterly about our civil & military efforts to protect ourselves against their evil intentions, schemes, plans & attacks with which they hope to injure our persons, destroy our property, ruin our economy and conquer our nation. To Hell with those fiends! Their fabulistic mopery is perfectly unacceptable. They arrogate to themselves the ‘divine’ ‘right and duty’ to attack & conquer us and simultaneously deny our right to defend against their attacks.

  • stereotypical association of religion with terrorism and violence by the media

Snake Feces!!! The assertion is absolutely untrue, false on its face & malicious in its intent. By God, I have proof, derived from Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegeses & jurisprudence and I will submit it. I will extract the core expressions and provide links so that the reader can verify them and read the context. Terrorism & genocidal Jihad are intrinsic sacraments of Islam. Annual attacks against Kuffar are a basic requirement of Shari’ah (Islamic law).

  • aggressive conquest: [Insets are from Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir, underlined phrases are linked.]
  • 8:39 fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ].
  • 8:60 Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, [Abdullah Yusuf Ali]
  • 9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • 9:123 Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you
  • Bukhari1.8.387 “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us
  • Bukhari4.53.386 Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”
  • Muslim19.4294 If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them...
  • Abut Dawud23.3455 When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.
  • The four following citations are from Reliance of the Traveller, the handbook of Shari’ah, a scanned image at Scribid; enter the reference letter & numbers in the search window just above the image of the text.
  • O9.1 The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.
  • O9.8 The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians…
  • O9.9 The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim…
  • O25.9 and if the area has a border adjacent to enemy lands, an eighth duty arises, namely to undertake jihad against enemies, dividing the spoils of battle among combatants, and setting aside fifth (def: o10.3) for deserving recipients.
  • terrorism
    • 3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve
    • (I was given five things that no other Prophet before me was given. I was aided with fear the distance of one month, the earth was made a Masjid and clean place for me, I was allowed war booty, I was given the Intercession, and Prophets used to be sent to their people, but I was sent to all mankind particularly.)

  • 8:12 I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.
  • 33:26 Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 59:2 But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts,
  • 59:13 Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Bani An-Nadir) breasts than Allah.
  • Bukhari1.7.331 Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
  • Bukhari4.52.220 I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy),
  • genocide
    • 8:67 It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land.
    • 47:4 So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm
    • Abu Dawud38.4390 I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

    Allah’s word: “fight them”, “fight those who”, “we shall cast terror”, “I will cast terror”, “he cast terror” and Moe’s word: “made me victorious by awe”, “made victorious with terror” clearly prove the assertion of stereotypical association to be malicious malarkey of the worst sort. This proof is confirmed both by exegeses and by Shari’ah. The Order to fight, command to fight, the Caliph makes war; what could possibly be more clear? Islam is evil by design, mercenary & martial; terrorist & genocidal; created for Moe’s emolument & empowerment. Muslims and their allies seek to criminalize the revelation of these fatal facts.

    • racial discrimination condoned by governmental and state agencies, policies and practices
    • may endanger friendly relations between peoples, cooperation among nations, and international peace and security

    Paragraph 6 is a pretext for a threat of war. That is absolutely unacceptable.

    7. Confirms that [recognition of and full] respect for cultural diversity [and multiculturalism] [is an important tool to combat racial discrimination] [contributes to combating racial discrimination] [Stresses that the respect for cultural diversity is a fundamental principle to combat racial discrimination.] [while bearing in mind the significance of national and regional particularities, as well as social, cultural and religious backgrounds, it is reiterated that they may not be invoked to disregard [internationally accepted] [international human rights law] [human rights and fundamental freedoms] [while reiterating that cultural particularities cannot be invoked to [derogate] [disregard] [from] international human rights law];

    8. [Alarmed at the intellectual and political [resistance] [opposition] to [cultural diversity,] multiculturalism, which is one of the root-causes of the resurgence of racist and xenophobic violence, reiterates that rejection of diversity has led to the negation of the very humanity of the immigrant, foreigner and other racial and religious minorities;]

    ALT: Reiterates that the rejection of diversity is one of the root causes of the resurgence of racist and xenophobic violence;

    In paragraphs 7 & 8, we we have a prime example of projection. Islam is supremacist & intolerant. “then their blood and property will be sacred to us” from Bukhari 1.8.387 (quoted above) shows us who denies the humanity of “religious minorities’.

    15. [Deplores the numerous occurrences of [armed] [internal] [and international] conflicts and inter-ethnic and intra-religious or communal violence, including those that appear to be based on tribal lines, which have lead to casualties and killings, torture, massive displacement, rape and destruction of property and infrastructures, war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide;]

    16. Emphasizes that the multiple factors of a situation that might lead to genocide, as defined in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, include the resurgence of systematic discrimination, the prevalence of expressions of hate speech targeting persons belonging to national, ethnic, racial or religious groups,requests States to respect and implement the responsibility to protect in conformity with paragraphs 138 and 139 of the World Summit Outcome [especially in the context of serious and systematic violation of human rights] [especially if they are uttered in the context of an actual or potential outbreak of violence, and serious and systematic violation of human rights] [and ]; [proposal to move second part to section 5]

    Paragraph 15 is supreme hypocrisy. Currently ongoing genocide, such as that in Darfur, arises from Allah’s word & Moe’s example. It is perpetrated by Muslims against those they consider Kuffar or hypocrites. Paragraph 16 carries hypocrisy to a new level of accomplishment.

    • prevalence of expressions of hate speech targeting persons belonging to national, ethnic, racial or religious groups,

    Muslims need not go far to find examples of hate speech, it is as close as the nearest Mosque, where they express their hatred of Jews & Christians five times per day while reciting Surah Al-Fatihah.

    • 1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
    • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
    • 9:30. And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!
    • 9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).

    (Racial profiling, counter-terrorism)
    22. [Draws attention to the impact of] [Strongly deplores the [overt and covert] discriminatory] counter-terrorism measures [on] [that have led to] the rise of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance [including the practice of racial, ethnic, national and religious profiling;]

    NEW PARA: Also condemns all acts of ethnic, racial or religious profiling and segregation in any society, wherever it may occur, and its concomitant negative impact on the human rights of affected segments of population [and urges States to take resolute action against those responsible both in the public and private sectors]; [proposal to move to section 5].

    NEW PARA: Reaffirms that counter-terrorism strategies should not undermine the protection of human rights and the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

    Both attacks on the World Trade Center, the attack on the Pentagon, the attack on the Madrid rail system and the London subway and bus systems were perpetrated by young Muslim males, not elderly nuns. Terrorism is mainly perpetrated by Muslims. Common sense dictates putting Muslims under close scrutiny. There is one reasonable solution: sent the Muslims home, where they won’t be profiled nor suffer discrimination. And keep them out of our countries so we won’t suffer terrorism. Let them walk or swim instead of flying & sailing. That would reduce the lines at airports considerably and restore security too.

    (Freedom of religion, incitement to religious intolerance, hatred, or violence, defamation of religion, freedom of expression)


    23. Reaffirms the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief and expresses concern over intolerance[s] and discrimination [practiced, misusing religions or belief] [on the grounds] [and] [in the name] of religion or belief;

    Except, of course Dhimmitude & Jizya, imposed upon conquered Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians. Oh, you did not know about it? Read the Pact of Umar.


    24. Recognizes with deep concern the global rise in the number of incidents of intolerance and violence against members of religious minorities in various parts of the world [in particular] motivated by [different forms of religious intolerance] [Islamophobia, anti-Arabism, anti-Semitism and Christianophobia];

    Such as discrimination and pogroms against Christians in Egypt? Are you concerned about their rights & welfare? How about Christians being persecuted by Muslims in Bethlehem?

    ALT: Recognizes with deep concern the global rise in the number of incidents of intolerance and violence against members of religious minorities in various parts of the world;

    25. Condemns any advocacy of racial or religious hatred which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and recognizes that only a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law may determine, case by case, in a fair and public hearing, whether the facts presented qualify as incitement to racial or religious hatred [prohibited by law];

    Why don’t you come right out and openly condemn the Qur’an, which declares war on Pagans, Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians? I previously showed you the ayat declaring war and one hadith confirming them. Why don’t you do something about that?

    ALT: Condemns any advocacy of racial or religious hatred which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and [should be prohibited by law;]

    The Qur’an inculcates hatred of Jews, Christians & Pagans. Why don’t you condemn it? Why don’t you specifically & explicitly condemn 8:39, 9:29 & 9:123? Why don’t you condemn the ahadith which confirm those imperatives to conquest?

    26. [[Notes with concern] [Seriously concerned at the] instances of defamation of religions, which manifests itself in [projecting negative, insulting and derogatory images of religions and religious personalities,] generalized and stereotypical association of religions, in particular Islam, with violence and terrorism, thus impacting negatively on the rights of individuals belonging to these religions, including Muslim minorities, and exposing them to hatred and discrimination. Such situations are further aggravated by the imposition of restrictions on the profession of religions, including [the surveillance of places of worship and restrictions on their construction] [the construction of places of worship and their surveillance];]

    Paragraph 26 is redundant; I previously proved that the assertion of stereotypical association of Islam with violence & terrorism is malicious malarkey.

    28. Reaffirms a holistic approach to human rights guaranteeing the indivisibility of all human rights, and stresses that [fundamental freedoms of expression and association should continue to contribute and promote the positive and desirable phenomenon of multiculturalism, respect for cultural diversity and tolerance among all religions, peoples and societies.] [the fight against racial and religious hatred should not serve as a pretext to legitimize impermissible limitations to freedom of expression] [as the right to freedom of expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of a democratic society as it ensures individual self-fulfillment and a pluralistic, tolerant society with access to multitudes of ideas and philosophies];

    ALT/NEW PARA: Reiterates that freedom of religion or belief, freedom of opinion and expression and non-discrimination are interdependent and stresses the need to strengthen the process of effectively adjudicating cases associated with incitement to national racial and religious hatred in accordance with the permissible limitations under article 20 of the ICCPR and analogous instruments;

    NEW PARA: Recognizes the importance of the positive role that can be played by the media in this context in particular through a responsible media that abstains from diffusing hate or defamatory information and that engages to fight against such practices;

    Islam will not tolerate criticism. Here is an example: the Secretary General condemning Fitna

    Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

    “There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

    Fitna displays verses from the Qur’an with rabble rousing Imams, Islamic mob scenes and the aftermath of terrorism. It shows cause & effect. That is neither hate speech nor incitement; it is objective factual reality. Saying anything negative about Allah, his Messenger or their canon of scripture is a capital offense.

    • O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam
    • -4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);
    • -5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

    • -6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

    • -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

    • -16- to revile the religion of Islam;
    • -19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

    • -20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala’iyya (y4), 423-24). )

    • O8.1 When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.
    • O8.2 In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

    The pact of Dhimmitude is violated if a Dhimmi says anything negative about Islam.

    • O11.10 or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam

    143. [Calls on CERD and the Human Rights Committee to elaborate model legislation on [the necessity of upholding respect for human rights and reputation, public morals, as well as] incitement to racial and religious hatred and freedom of expression;]

    We have already seen their determination to silence Islam’s critics. They are demanding criminalization of expression critical of Islam.

    Action at the national level (Racist theories, ideologies, doctrines, incitement to racial hatred, nationalist ideologies, national preference theories)

    NEW PARA: Calls on States [that while identifying] [to identify] [different forms and manifestations of] [new emerging forms and manifestations of] racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance] [and] take effective, tangible and comprehensive measures to prevent, combat and eradicate them as a matter of priority;

    NEW PARA: Calls on States to prohibit by law and adopt necessary policy measures to combat [in accordance with norms of international law] the dissemination of all ideas based on racial superiority or hatred and incitement to hatred; (Racist crimes, hate crimes, urban violence)

    152. Calls on States to combat impunity for acts of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, [and to grant appropriate redress for victims] [by securing access to justice, by granting [and maximizing] [maximum] [fair] [just and adequate] [appropriate] redress for victims];

    Remember that criticism of Islam is equated with racism in their Orwellian new speak. These provisions effectively demand the passage and enforcement of legislation outlawing and penalizing criticism of Islam in clear and open violation of the first amendment.

    [ALT: Calls on States to combat impunity for acts of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobiaand related intolerance and provide [by providing] [just and adequate] [maximum] [fair] redress for victims, including through securing expeditious access to justice;]

    153. Urges States, as a matter of priority, to [prohibit] [and criminalize] [any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence in accordance with [all] pertinent international instruments] [and punish violent, racist and xenophobic activities of neo-Nazi groups in accordance with pertinent international instruments]; ALT: Urges States, as a matter of priority, to prohibit [and criminalize] any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence in accordance with all pertinent international instruments and punish violent, racist and xenophobic activities [of neo-Nazi groups] accordingly;

    154. Invites Governments and their law enforcement agencies to collect reliable information on hate crimes in order to strengthen their efforts to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance; [Adopted ad ref.]

    According to those arrogant, self-righteous AssWholes, this blog post is a criminal offense. Re-examine The Secretary General’s egregious remark.

    Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

    “There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

    Watch the video again, through the link I provided. Is that hate speech? Does Geert Wilders incite anyone to violence? Were the ayat he quoted hate speech? Did those ayat incite violence? Did the Imams ranting & raving in the video utter hate speech and incite violence? Did Ban Ki-moon condemn the wrong person, letting the real malfactor go condoned, not condemned?

    To Islam and its United Nations Dhimmis, pointing out Islam’s hate & violence is hate speech and inciting violence. That is Orwellian moral inversion at its finest!

    (Freedom of religion, incitement to religious intolerance, hatred, or violence, defamation of religion, freedom of expression)

    159. Urges States to take effective measures to address contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, and to take firm action against negative stereotyping of religions and defamation of religious personalities, holy books, scriptures and symbols;

    160. Calls on States to develop, and where appropriate to incorporate, permissible limitations on the exercise of the right to freedom of expression into national legislation;

    161. Reminds States to promote and protect the exercise of the rights set out in the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, proclaimed by the General Assembly in its resolution 36/55 of 25 November 1981, in order to obviate religious discrimination which, when combined with certain other forms of discrimination, constitutes a form of multiple discrimination;

    162. Calls on States to ensure that lawmakers discharge their responsibilities in conformity with paragraph 2 of article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and article 4 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, taking into account General Comment 15 of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination;

    These demands for legislation criminalizing revelation of the truth about Islam from its own canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence is absolutely unacceptable! I will not accept it. I curse and condemn it and its authors.

    I disrespectfully demand:

    1. That Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly reject the Durban II draft document as revised and forswear U.S. participation in the conference.
    2. That the Congress pass and President Obama execute legislation withholding payment of such part of our U.N. assessment as would be used to finance the Durban II conference.
    3. That the Congress pass and President Obama execute articles of withdrawal from the U.N. and legislation expelling that organization and its appendages from our soil.

    I urge and exhort all U.S. citizens who read this blog post to join me in those disrespectful demands. Please sign and promote the following related petitions:
    Quit the U.N.!
    Outlaw Islam!

    Related blog posts:


    Durban II: Egregious Arrogance Part 1
    Durban II: Egregious Arrogance Part 2
    Durban II: Egregious Arrogance Part 3
    Durban II: Egregious Arrogance Part 4
    Durban II: Egregious Arrogance Part 5
    Durban II: Egregious Arrogance Part 6
    Durban II: Egregious Arrogance Part 7

    United Nations Ban Criticism of Islam
    UN Resolutions Revisited: Defamation of Religions
    U.N. Bans Criticism of Islam: Pretext
    More UN AssWholliness
    U.N. Interfaith Dialogue Conference
    Abdullah: On the Level or Sneaky Devil?
    Monologue: Prince Saud Al Faisal Spills the Beans
    Culture of Peace Conference

    Quit Aiding Our Enemies!

    An email from UN Watch brought the details I have been seeking about passage of the current defamation/censorship resolution which was recently passed by the General Assembly: Combating defamation of religion(A/C.3/63/L.22/Rev.1) .

    The following listed states voted for the resolution; against our right of free expression:

    • Afghanistan
    • Algeria
    • Angola\Antigua and Barbuda
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bahamas
    • Bahrain
    • Bangladesh
    • Barbados
    • Belarus
    • Bhutan
    • Bolivia
    • Brunei
    • Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • Comoros
    • Côte d’Ivoire
    • Cuba
    • Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
    • Djibouti
    • Dominica
    • Egypt
    • El Salvador
    • Eritrea
    • Ethiopia
    • Fiji
    • Gabon
    • Gambia
    • Guinea
    • Guinea-Bissau
    • Guyana
    • Honduras
    • Indonesia
    • Iran, Iraq
    • Jamaica
    • Jordan
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kuwait
    • Kyrgyzstan
    • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
    • Lebanon
    • LesothoLibya
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Mali
    • Mauritania
    • Morocco
    • Mozambique
    • Myanmar
    • Namibia
    • Nicaragua
    • Niger
    • Nigeria
    • Oman
    • Pakistan
    • Philippines
    • Qatar
    • Russia
    • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
    • Sao Tome and Principe
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Senegal
    • Sierra Leone
    • Singapore
    • Somalia
    • South Africa
    • Sri Lanka
    • Sudan
    • Suriname
    • Swaziland
    • Syria
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Togo
    • Tunisia
    • Turkey
    • Turkmenistan
    • Uganda
    • United Arab Emirates
    • Uzbekistan
    • Venezuela
    • Viet Nam
    • Yemen
    • Zimbabwe.

    The above listed states are enemies of liberty and human rights; not our friends nor allies. They should not be trusted, neither should they be benefiting directly from our tax money. Cut them off!!!

    The following listed states abstained from voting:

    • Argentina
    • Armenia
    • Benin
    • Botswana
    • Brazil
    • Burkina Faso
    • Burundi
    • Central African Republic
    • Chile
    • Colombia
    • Congo
    • Costa Rica
    • Dominican Republic
    • Ecuador
    • Ghana
    • Grenada
    • Guatemala
    • Haiti
    • India
    • Japan
    • Kenya
    • Madagascar
    • Malawi
    • Mauritius
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Panama
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Paraguay
    • Peru
    • Rwanda
    • Saint Lucia
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Trinidad and Tobago
    • Tuvalu
    • United Republic of Tanzania
    • Uruguay
    • Vanuatu
    • Zambia.

    By not voting against the resolution, these abstainers effectively voted for it, allowing it to pass. Lets review what they voted to support: supression of free speech about the evil mission, doctrines & practices of Moe’s Murder Cult.

    Expressing concern at the increase in racist violence and xenophobic ideas in
    many parts of the world, in political circles, in the sphere of public opinion and in
    society at large, as a result, inter alia, of the resurgence of activities of political
    parties and associations established on the basis of racist, xenophobic and
    ideological superiority platforms and charters, and the persistent use of those
    platforms and charters to promote or incite racist ideologies,

    Always bear this fact in mind: these corrupt politicians, masquerading as statesmen, conflate justified opposition to Moe’s Murder Cult with racism. Recall this excrement from the Durban II Draft.

    26. Note that As regards the debate of contemporary forms of racism, some of the most worrying trends since 2001 include racio-religious profiling and discrimination, defamation of Muslims, their faith and beliefs, incitement to religious hatred and its concomitant effects on multiculturalism, national and international peace and stability as well as human rights of the affected communities.

    The Qur’an exemplifies everything they bitterly bitch about. Nay more! It declares perpetual war upon us! Has none of those corrupt tyrants read Surah Al-Taubah 29? Has none of them read Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of that verse: The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah ? Has none of them read Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9?

    Deeply alarmed at the rising trends towards discrimination based on religion
    or belief, including in some national policies, laws and administrative measures that
    stigmatize groups of people belonging to certain religions and beliefs under a
    variety of pretexts relating to security and illegal immigration, thereby legitimizing
    discrimination against them, and consequently impairing their enjoyment of the
    right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and impeding their ability to
    observe, practise and manifest their religion freely and without fear of coercion,
    violence or reprisal,

    How many synagogues are there in Saudi Arabia; how many churches? Why? Is it legal to build churches in Egypt? What legal restrictions are imposed upon conquered Jews & Christians by Sharia? Do you know? Do you give a damn?
    Reliance of the Traveller , Book O, Chapter 11.1-11.11 will make it clear to anyone who doubts. Their rank hypocrisy shines & stinks like a dead carp on the river bank. Who can see or smell it?

    Do you comprehend the fact that observing, practising & manifesting Islam involves genocidal aggression, casting terror, killing men, raping their widows and selling their orphans into slavery? Do you give a damn? Why the Hell not? Does the premature & unnecessary death of 80 million Hindus, 1.5 million Armenians or 750 thousand Assyrians mean nothing to you? How about the hundreds of children slaughtered at Beslan? Do you care about the thousands so recently slaughtered in New York City in Allah’s accursed name? Are you human? Is there any moral justification for your continued existence?

    What do these words mean? What texts did Ibn Kathir use to source them? What do those texts say? Ibn Kathir quotes them. Do you have the courage to read them and learn or are you a soulless zombie?

    Who gave those orders? Who proclaimed that ‘good news’?

    Stressing that defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity
    leading to the illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents and
    incitement to religious hatred and violence,

    What does Allah say about Jews & Christians in his book? Who are the sons of ‘apes and swine’; ‘worst of living creatures’? Who did Allah curse? Upon whom will he send tormentors to humiliate them until Resurrection Day? Is that defamation? Relegating Jesus to the role of Allah’s slave; is that defamation? Assigning Jesus the role of genocidal warmonger; is that defamation? Declaring war upon us until we are subjugated and pay extortion; barring public processions & prayers, ringing bells & displaying crosses; is that illicit restriction? Declaring that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims; is that a trifling affront to human dignity? But the UN does not give a damn about them; their only concern is that we might expose these facts about Islam; that we might demand effective protection from Islamic aggression.

    Expresses deep concern at the negative stereotyping of religions and
    manifestations of intolerance and discrimination in matters of religion or belief still
    evident in the world;

    That paragraph relates to association of Islam with Jihad & terrorism, which is well founded in Islamic scripture, tradition & history.

    Notes with deep concern the intensification of the overall campaign of
    defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, including the
    ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic
    events of 11 September 2001;

    They don’t give a damn about the slaughter perpetrated by Muslims acting in Allah’s in emulation of Moe. No, they are deeply concerned that we might carefully observe young Muslim males acting suspiciously or entering the country. Get a clue for Chrissake!

    Recognizes that, in the context of the fight against terrorism, defamation
    of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, become aggravating
    factors that contribute to the denial of fundamental rights and freedoms of members
    of target groups, as well as their economic and social exclusion;

    Is there any right more fundamental than the right to live in peace, undisturbed by conquest, terrorism & rapine? Is there any right more fundamental than the right to name and accurately describe the doctrines, mission and practices of an enemy which is hellbent on our destruction?

    Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and
    wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

    Who the Hell made any such association? Could it be Allah? Could it be Moe? The lips through which those words passed first osculated Satan’s anus.

    • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
    • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
      Narrated Anas bin Malik:
      Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
    • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.
    • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
    • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
      Narrated Abu Huraira:

      Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

    Exactly who the Hell associated Islam with violence & terror? It wasn’t Geert Wilders. It wasn’t Robert Spencer. It wasn’t me. Who was it?!!

    Reiterates the commitment of all States to the implementation, in an integrated manner, of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which was adopted without a vote by the General Assembly on 8 September 200612 and reaffirmed by the Assembly in its resolution 62/272 of 5 September 2008, and which clearly confirms, inter alia, that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, stressing the need to reinforce the international community’s commitment to promote a culture of peace, justice and human development, ethnic, national and religious tolerance, and respect for all religions, religious values, beliefs or cultures and prevent the defamation of religions;

    Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, established & exemplified by:

    Deplores the use of the print, audio-visual and electronic media,
    including the Internet, and any other means to incite acts of violence, xenophobia or
    related intolerance and discrimination against any religion, as well as targeting of
    religious symbols;

    Exactly what are they bitching about? This blog post and others like it. Also FITNA, the brief video created by Geert Wilders. Examine what Ban Ki-moon said about FITNA.

    “There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

    Fitna merely quotes the Qur’an & hadith and shows Imams preaching that crap, followed by the inevitable results. The Secretary General labels that ‘hate speech’.

    Emphasizes that, as stipulated in international human rights law,
    everyone has the right to hold opinions without interference, and has the right to
    freedom of expression, the exercise of which carries with it special duties and
    responsibilities and may therefore be subject to limitations as are provided for by
    law and are necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, protection of
    national security or of public order, public health or morals;

    Was there a duty, in 1938, to keep silent about the mission & doctrines of the German National Socialist Party? Should anyone attempting to expose Hitler’s agenda of conquest & slaughter have been imprisoned for his efforts? Is there any good reason, when enemy agents have murdered our fellow citizens and threaten to repeat the act on a greater scale, for us to keep silent about the identity and character of the enemy which slaughtered thousands?

    President Bush describes Islam as a great religion of peace hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists. Allah said “fight them”. Allah established making a great slaughter as a prerequisite for admission to Paradise. Allah purchased the lives & property of Muslims so that they fight in his cause, kill and are killed for which they receive admission to Paradise. Moe said that he was “ordered to fight”; that he was “made victorious with terror”. The states listed above voted to criminalize the revelation of these fatal facts of Islam. They voted to demand the passage & enforcement of legislation that would prohibit this blog post and the publishing of FITNA.

    Reaffirms the obligation of all States to enact the necessary legislation to
    prohibit the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes
    incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence
    , and encourages States, in their
    follow-up to the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination,
    Xenophobia and Related Intolerance,7 to include aspects relating to national or
    ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities in their national plans of action and, in
    this context, to take forms of multiple discrimination against minorities fully into
    account;

    Recall what Ban Ki-Moon said about FITNA.

    Urges all States to provide, within their respective legal and
    constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination,
    intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions, and incitement to
    religious hatred in general, to take all possible measures to promote tolerance and
    respect for all religions and beliefs
    and the understanding of their value systems and
    to complement legal systems with intellectual and moral strategies to combat
    religious hatred and intolerance;

    How could anyone with a scintilla of residual morality promote tolerance of and respect for Moe’s Murder Cult; the ultimate proponent of intolerance? How the Hell can we promote understanding of Islam’s value systems without reading and discussing its canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence?

    Islam is a war machine wearing the uniform of religion as a camouflage. If we are to be prosecuted & persecuted for revealing that fact, then we will be led, dumb like sheep, to the slaughter.

    Please send an email to your Representative & Senators, demanding that foreign aid be cut off from the nations above listed, who voted to contravene our first amendment right of free expression. Congress.org makes it easy to send an email by filling out a simple form. You can include a link to this blog post in your email by copying and pasting the following text.

    Quit Aiding Our Enemies!

    That way, you won’t need to type in the list of inimical states, the congressional staffers can click the link and get it from this post.

    Related posts:

    Quit Aiding Our Enemies!

    An email from UN Watch brought the details I have been seeking about passage of the current defamation/censorship resolution which was recently passed by the General Assembly: Combating defamation of religion(A/C.3/63/L.22/Rev.1) .

    The following listed states voted for the resolution; against our right of free expression:

    • Afghanistan
    • Algeria
    • Angola\Antigua and Barbuda
    • Azerbaijan
    • Bahamas
    • Bahrain
    • Bangladesh
    • Barbados
    • Belarus
    • Bhutan
    • Bolivia
    • Brunei
    • Darussalam
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • Comoros
    • Côte d’Ivoire
    • Cuba
    • Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
    • Djibouti
    • Dominica
    • Egypt
    • El Salvador
    • Eritrea
    • Ethiopia
    • Fiji
    • Gabon
    • Gambia
    • Guinea
    • Guinea-Bissau
    • Guyana
    • Honduras
    • Indonesia
    • Iran, Iraq
    • Jamaica
    • Jordan
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kuwait
    • Kyrgyzstan
    • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
    • Lebanon
    • LesothoLibya
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Mali
    • Mauritania
    • Morocco
    • Mozambique
    • Myanmar
    • Namibia
    • Nicaragua
    • Niger
    • Nigeria
    • Oman
    • Pakistan
    • Philippines
    • Qatar
    • Russia
    • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
    • Sao Tome and Principe
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Senegal
    • Sierra Leone
    • Singapore
    • Somalia
    • South Africa
    • Sri Lanka
    • Sudan
    • Suriname
    • Swaziland
    • Syria
    • Tajikistan
    • Thailand
    • Togo
    • Tunisia
    • Turkey
    • Turkmenistan
    • Uganda
    • United Arab Emirates
    • Uzbekistan
    • Venezuela
    • Viet Nam
    • Yemen
    • Zimbabwe.

    The above listed states are enemies of liberty and human rights; not our friends nor allies. They should not be trusted, neither should they be benefiting directly from our tax money. Cut them off!!!

    The following listed states abstained from voting:

    • Argentina
    • Armenia
    • Benin
    • Botswana
    • Brazil
    • Burkina Faso
    • Burundi
    • Central African Republic
    • Chile
    • Colombia
    • Congo
    • Costa Rica
    • Dominican Republic
    • Ecuador
    • Ghana
    • Grenada
    • Guatemala
    • Haiti
    • India
    • Japan
    • Kenya
    • Madagascar
    • Malawi
    • Mauritius
    • Mexico
    • Mongolia
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Panama
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Paraguay
    • Peru
    • Rwanda
    • Saint Lucia
    • Timor-Leste
    • Tonga
    • Trinidad and Tobago
    • Tuvalu
    • United Republic of Tanzania
    • Uruguay
    • Vanuatu
    • Zambia.

    By not voting against the resolution, these abstainers effectively voted for it, allowing it to pass. Lets review what they voted to support: supression of free speech about the evil mission, doctrines & practices of Moe’s Murder Cult.

    Expressing concern at the increase in racist violence and xenophobic ideas in
    many parts of the world, in political circles, in the sphere of public opinion and in
    society at large, as a result, inter alia, of the resurgence of activities of political
    parties and associations established on the basis of racist, xenophobic and
    ideological superiority platforms and charters, and the persistent use of those
    platforms and charters to promote or incite racist ideologies,

    Always bear this fact in mind: these corrupt politicians, masquerading as statesmen, conflate justified opposition to Moe’s Murder Cult with racism. Recall this excrement from the Durban II Draft.

    26. Note that As regards the debate of contemporary forms of racism, some of the most worrying trends since 2001 include racio-religious profiling and discrimination, defamation of Muslims, their faith and beliefs, incitement to religious hatred and its concomitant effects on multiculturalism, national and international peace and stability as well as human rights of the affected communities.

    The Qur’an exemplifies everything they bitterly bitch about. Nay more! It declares perpetual war upon us! Has none of those corrupt tyrants read Surah Al-Taubah 29? Has none of them read Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of that verse: The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah ? Has none of them read Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9?

    Deeply alarmed at the rising trends towards discrimination based on religion
    or belief, including in some national policies, laws and administrative measures that
    stigmatize groups of people belonging to certain religions and beliefs under a
    variety of pretexts relating to security and illegal immigration, thereby legitimizing
    discrimination against them, and consequently impairing their enjoyment of the
    right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and impeding their ability to
    observe, practise and manifest their religion freely and without fear of coercion,
    violence or reprisal,

    How many synagogues are there in Saudi Arabia; how many churches? Why? Is it legal to build churches in Egypt? What legal restrictions are imposed upon conquered Jews & Christians by Sharia? Do you know? Do you give a damn?
    Reliance of the Traveller , Book O, Chapter 11.1-11.11 will make it clear to anyone who doubts. Their rank hypocrisy shines & stinks like a dead carp on the river bank. Who can see or smell it?

    Do you comprehend the fact that observing, practising & manifesting Islam involves genocidal aggression, casting terror, killing men, raping their widows and selling their orphans into slavery? Do you give a damn? Why the Hell not? Does the premature & unnecessary death of 80 million Hindus, 1.5 million Armenians or 750 thousand Assyrians mean nothing to you? How about the hundreds of children slaughtered at Beslan? Do you care about the thousands so recently slaughtered in New York City in Allah’s accursed name? Are you human? Is there any moral justification for your continued existence?

    What do these words mean? What texts did Ibn Kathir use to source them? What do those texts say? Ibn Kathir quotes them. Do you have the courage to read them and learn or are you a soulless zombie?

    Who gave those orders? Who proclaimed that ‘good news’?

    Stressing that defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity
    leading to the illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents and
    incitement to religious hatred and violence,

    What does Allah say about Jews & Christians in his book? Who are the sons of ‘apes and swine’; ‘worst of living creatures’? Who did Allah curse? Upon whom will he send tormentors to humiliate them until Resurrection Day? Is that defamation? Relegating Jesus to the role of Allah’s slave; is that defamation? Assigning Jesus the role of genocidal warmonger; is that defamation? Declaring war upon us until we are subjugated and pay extortion; barring public processions & prayers, ringing bells & displaying crosses; is that illicit restriction? Declaring that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims; is that a trifling affront to human dignity? But the UN does not give a damn about them; their only concern is that we might expose these facts about Islam; that we might demand effective protection from Islamic aggression.

    Expresses deep concern at the negative stereotyping of religions and
    manifestations of intolerance and discrimination in matters of religion or belief still
    evident in the world;

    That paragraph relates to association of Islam with Jihad & terrorism, which is well founded in Islamic scripture, tradition & history.

    Notes with deep concern the intensification of the overall campaign of
    defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, including the
    ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic
    events of 11 September 2001;

    They don’t give a damn about the slaughter perpetrated by Muslims acting in Allah’s in emulation of Moe. No, they are deeply concerned that we might carefully observe young Muslim males acting suspiciously or entering the country. Get a clue for Chrissake!

    Recognizes that, in the context of the fight against terrorism, defamation
    of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, become aggravating
    factors that contribute to the denial of fundamental rights and freedoms of members
    of target groups, as well as their economic and social exclusion;

    Is there any right more fundamental than the right to live in peace, undisturbed by conquest, terrorism & rapine? Is there any right more fundamental than the right to name and accurately describe the doctrines, mission and practices of an enemy which is hellbent on our destruction?

    Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and
    wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

    Who the Hell made any such association? Could it be Allah? Could it be Moe? The lips through which those words passed first osculated Satan’s anus.

    • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
    • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
      Narrated Anas bin Malik:
      Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
    • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.
    • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
    • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
      Narrated Abu Huraira:

      Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

    Exactly who the Hell associated Islam with violence & terror? It wasn’t Geert Wilders. It wasn’t Robert Spencer. It wasn’t me. Who was it?!!

    Reiterates the commitment of all States to the implementation, in an integrated manner, of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which was adopted without a vote by the General Assembly on 8 September 200612 and reaffirmed by the Assembly in its resolution 62/272 of 5 September 2008, and which clearly confirms, inter alia, that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, stressing the need to reinforce the international community’s commitment to promote a culture of peace, justice and human development, ethnic, national and religious tolerance, and respect for all religions, religious values, beliefs or cultures and prevent the defamation of religions;

    Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, established & exemplified by:

    Deplores the use of the print, audio-visual and electronic media,
    including the Internet, and any other means to incite acts of violence, xenophobia or
    related intolerance and discrimination against any religion, as well as targeting of
    religious symbols;

    Exactly what are they bitching about? This blog post and others like it. Also FITNA, the brief video created by Geert Wilders. Examine what Ban Ki-moon said about FITNA.

    “There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

    Fitna merely quotes the Qur’an & hadith and shows Imams preaching that crap, followed by the inevitable results. The Secretary General labels that ‘hate speech’.

    Emphasizes that, as stipulated in international human rights law,
    everyone has the right to hold opinions without interference, and has the right to
    freedom of expression, the exercise of which carries with it special duties and
    responsibilities and may therefore be subject to limitations as are provided for by
    law and are necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, protection of
    national security or of public order, public health or morals;

    Was there a duty, in 1938, to keep silent about the mission & doctrines of the German National Socialist Party? Should anyone attempting to expose Hitler’s agenda of conquest & slaughter have been imprisoned for his efforts? Is there any good reason, when enemy agents have murdered our fellow citizens and threaten to repeat the act on a greater scale, for us to keep silent about the identity and character of the enemy which slaughtered thousands?

    President Bush describes Islam as a great religion of peace hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists. Allah said “fight them”. Allah established making a great slaughter as a prerequisite for admission to Paradise. Allah purchased the lives & property of Muslims so that they fight in his cause, kill and are killed for which they receive admission to Paradise. Moe said that he was “ordered to fight”; that he was “made victorious with terror”. The states listed above voted to criminalize the revelation of these fatal facts of Islam. They voted to demand the passage & enforcement of legislation that would prohibit this blog post and the publishing of FITNA.

    Reaffirms the obligation of all States to enact the necessary legislation to
    prohibit the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes
    incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence
    , and encourages States, in their
    follow-up to the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination,
    Xenophobia and Related Intolerance,7 to include aspects relating to national or
    ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities in their national plans of action and, in
    this context, to take forms of multiple discrimination against minorities fully into
    account;

    Recall what Ban Ki-Moon said about FITNA.

    Urges all States to provide, within their respective legal and
    constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination,
    intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions, and incitement to
    religious hatred in general, to take all possible measures to promote tolerance and
    respect for all religions and beliefs
    and the understanding of their value systems and
    to complement legal systems with intellectual and moral strategies to combat
    religious hatred and intolerance;

    How could anyone with a scintilla of residual morality promote tolerance of and respect for Moe’s Murder Cult; the ultimate proponent of intolerance? How the Hell can we promote understanding of Islam’s value systems without reading and discussing its canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence?

    Islam is a war machine wearing the uniform of religion as a camouflage. If we are to be prosecuted & persecuted for revealing that fact, then we will be led, dumb like sheep, to the slaughter.

    Please send an email to your Representative & Senators, demanding that foreign aid be cut off from the nations above listed, who voted to contravene our first amendment right of free expression. Congress.org makes it easy to send an email by filling out a simple form. You can include a link to this blog post in your email by copying and pasting the following text.

    Quit Aiding Our Enemies!

    That way, you won’t need to type in the list of inimical states, the congressional staffers can click the link and get it from this post.

    Related posts:

    FITNA Redux

    LiveLeak has had to remove Fitna due to the following:

    From the The Jawa Report:

    Video follows this message of explanation just posted at Liveleak:

    “Following threats to our staff of a very serious nature, and some ill informed reports from certain corners of the British media that could directly lead to the harm of some of our staff, Liveleak.com has been
    left with no other choice but to remove Fitna from our servers.

    This is a sad day for freedom of speech on the net but we have to
    place the safety and well being of our staff above all else. We would
    like to thank the thousands of people, from all backgrounds and
    religions, who gave us their support. They realised LiveLeak.com is a
    vehicle for many opinions and not just for the support of one.
    Perhaps there is still hope that this situation may produce a
    discussion that could benefit and educate all of us as to how we can
    accept one anothers culture.

    We stood for what we believe in, the ability to be heard, but in the end the price was too high

    Never fear, YouTube has the movie up here: