Islam in Action


The video embedded here was recorded at a recent Islamic Festival held in Dearborn, Michigan. In it you will see and hear Muslims assaulting and attempting to intimidate a Christian. Observe their expressions and gestures; hear their words and experience Islamic supremacism, triumphalism and arrogance. As their numbers increase, their attitude will intensify. The video was posted to You Tube by Act! For America.

The video has a ten minute run time and is 23MB. If, like me, you are limited to a dial- up cconnection, you will need to download it. For that you will need Firefox or Flock, with DWHelper; you will also need Irfanview to play the flv file.

The video centers around the Islamic response to Christians who wanted to discuss a pamphlet distributed by Muslims at a booth in the festival. The pamphlet’s title was “Uprooting the Forces of Evil:: Islam’s War on Terrorism”. The pamphlet is available on the web as a pdf file at http://www.islaam.ca/downloads/islamswaronterror.pdf.

A critical examination of the pamphlet will explain their reluctance to have a Dialogue about it. The pamphlet is in question/answer format.

  • Are these indiscriminate bombings, such as what occurred in the US, London and Madrid, Islamically justifiable?
  • Islam unequivocally prohibits the likes of these horrendous acts and does not condone this awful behavior. Look at what Allah says, in the Quran, about those who kill innocent people.
  • “It would be as if he killed the whole of mankind; and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole of mankind.”(Al-Ma’idah: 32)
  • Prophet Muhammad- may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him-s stressed the prohibition of killing women and children on many occasions, even at times of war:
    • Abu Bakr; the Prophet’s closest disciple said :Do not kill women or children or a senile person, do not cut down fruit-bearing trees and do not destroy an inhabited place.”
  • Therefore, this behavior can never be justified in any way, shape or form.
  • The polemicist quotes 5:32, but completely ignores the verse which follows it, which has a bearing upon the definition of innocent.

    5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

    I have added emphasis to the most critical parts of that ayeh. We must focus our attention upon one key phrase: wage war against Allah; what does it mean?
    The answer is contained in Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir:

    […]`Wage war‘ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. […]

    Waging war against Allah and his Messnger consists of opposing and contradicting Islam and it includes three parallel sub elements:

    1. disbelief
    2. blocking roads
    3. spreading fear.

    If you do not believe in Allah, and fully submit to him, then you are not innocent; you may be killed with impunity because you are at war against Allah and his Messenger.

    Whenever a Muslim speaks or writes about the prohibition of killing innocent people, he practices kitman: lying by omission. In so doing, he relies upon your assumption that he shares your definition of innocent. He does not; In the Muslim world view, only Muslims are innocent.

    By the same token, we are expected to assume that the prohibition on killing women and children is based upon moral principles. It is not! The prohibition is economic, not moral. Kuffar women and children are economic assets for their captors. Examine Allah’s word..

    33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

    Note the italicized phrase: whom did they make captives? Once again, the answer is provided by Ibn Kathir.

    […]Those who were killed were their warriors, and the prisoners were their children and women.[…]

    What is the disposition of captive women and children? We learn from Shari’ah that they become slaves by reason of capture. Examine this quote from Reliance of the Traveller.

    O9.13 When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

    This hadith will clarify the matter for you; it should also fill you with disgust.

    Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459:

    Narrated Ibn Muhairiz:

    I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said, “We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, ‘How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us?” We asked (him) about it and he said, ‘It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist.”

    They received captives. Captive women were distributed as part of the spoils. Moe gave his companions permission to rape those women.

    Dear President Obama

    By Findalis

    Dear President Obama:

    You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me.

    You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.

    You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support.

    You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.

    You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.

    You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus don’t understand it at its core.

    You scare me because you lack humility and ‘class’, always blaming others.

    You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.

    You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the ‘blame America’ crowd and deliver this message abroad.

    You scare me because you want to change America to a European style country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector.

    You scare me because you want to replace our health care system with a government controlled one.

    You scare me because you prefer ‘wind mills’ to responsibly capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.

    You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of living in the world.

    You scare me because you have begun to use ‘extortion’ tactics against certain banks and corporations.

    You scare me because your own political party shrinks from challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.

    You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider opposing points of view from intelligent people.

    You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both omnipotent and omniscient.

    You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything you do.

    You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaughs, Hannitys, O’Relllys and Becks who offer opposing, conservative points of view.

    You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.

    Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.

    Lou Pritchett

    Lou Pritchet is a former vice president of Procter & Gamble whose career at that company spanned 36 years before his retirement in 1989, and he is the author of the 1995 business book, Stop Paddling & Start Rocking the Boat.

    Mr. Pritchett confirmed that he was indeed the author of the much-circulated “open letter.” “I did write the ‘you scare me’ letter. I sent it to the NY Times but they never acknowledged or published it. However, it hit the internet and according to the ‘experts’ has had over 500,000 hits.

    Rally Against Radical Islam

    The following was received in an email from the United American Committee.

    UAC logo Rally against jihad in NYC this Sunday

    Please tell anyone you know in the New York City area to attend the Rally for Human Rights & Freedom this Sunday in honor of our defenders: the U.S. Military, Homeland Security, and First Responders.

    MEMORIAL TO VICTIMS OF RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR

    Sunday, May 3rd 2009
    at high noon (12:00PM)
    Times Square
    (42nd St. and 7th Ave) New York City

    Be there!

    For more info contact info@hrcari.org

    Please share this with your friends.


    We need your support to continue our efforts.
    Contribute to the UAC online and securely by clicking here.

    United American Committee is a 501c(3) non-profit organization and contributions are fully tax deductible.
    United American Committee – P.O. Box 80325 – Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688


    According to an earlier email, which I am presently unable to find, a new organization has been formed: the Human Rights Coalition Against Radical Islam, whose new web site will launch on the 3rd.

    Evidently Robert Spencer did not delete the email; he published it at Jihad Watch. Read his post for a list of the featured participants and members of the coalition.

    If you live near enough to N.Y.C., please consider joining the rally. You can find details at HCRI and JW linked above.

    Regular readers of my postings will understand that I look at the title with a Calvin fish eye, because I disapprove of attaching qualifiers to the name of the enemy. Expressions such as “Radical Islam” falsely imply the existence of an anodyne standard Islam. In reality, Islam is defined by Moe’s recitation and exemplified by his Sunnah, both of which are exposed and documented in What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims?, which exposes what Moe said and did documented by links to authentic sources. Let doubters and dissenters turn to it first.

    There is no human right more fundamental than the right to live free from predation by our fellows. Islam denies that precious right. Consider what Moe said about the order he received to fight with men until they recite Shehada.

    “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.Bukhar 1.8.387

    Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims; that says it all.

    The Real Attack on the Bill of Rights

    The First Amendment is Under Siege

    posted on Tuesday, April 14, 2009 4:30 PM

    Selected excerpts interspersed with my comments.


    A dangerous attack on the American Bill of Rights has begun to show up on right wing blogs.

    In February of ’07, Pedestrian Infidel proposed a 28th Amendment to the Constitution. I believe that blog post to be the first such concrete proposal I encountered on the web. Others had suggested a need for legislation, some had suggested the need for an amendment, but, to the best of my knowledge, there were no concrete proposals. Concern about Islam’s threat to our liberties dates back more than two years, it is not a novelty.

    The proposed amendment is a counter attack against Islamic supremacism, not an attack against the Bill of Rights. An outline of the proposal follows.

    1. Islam is not recognized as a religion, it is stripped of First Amendment protection.
    2. Declares Islam an enemy of the United States of America and prohibits its public practice.
    3. Muslim institutions are to be closed and propagation of Islam prohibited. Muslim immigration is terminated.
    4. Discrimination, assault & impairment of individual rights (as limited by Art. 3) of Muslims prohibited.

    The threat to liberty issues from Islam, not from ‘Islamophobes’.

    • Islam denies freedom of conscience.

    3:2. Allâh! Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that exists.
    3:85
    . And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
    9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

    • Islam denies freedom of speech.

    O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam [If you leave Islam, you must be executed: O8.1 -.2]
    -3- to speak words that imply unbelief
    -4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);
    -5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);
    -6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;
    -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;
    -16- to revile the religion of Islam;
    -19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;
    -20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala’iyya (y4), 423-24). )

    • Islam denies freedom of religion.

    O11.5 Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:
    -2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
    -4- must keep to the side of the street;
    -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
    -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

    Source:: Umdat as-Salik, the hand book of Islamic law.

    Concerning proposals to write Islam out of the First Amendment, deport Muslims and close Islamic institutions, Jonathan responds: “ These attitudes are intolerable.” Either Jonathan’s value system varies greatly from ours or he perceives Islam through a fact filter that prevents him from perceiving Islam’s intolerance & violence, which make it intolerable to lovers of life and liberty.

    Allah’s word must be “made superior”, as specified in 9:33 and 48:28. Supremacism & triumphalism are interwoven throughout Islam’s canon of scripture. This fatal fact becomes clear when one reads the titles of related topics in Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir.

    How will Islam conquer us? By Jihad: “Holy fighting in Allah’s cause, “ordained” for Muslims,. as the price of admission to Paradise. Jihad continues from the beginning of Moe’s prophetic career until Judgment Day. Jihad is the Muslim’s “original. religion“. Islamic law requires that offensive Jihad be performed at least once in every year[Umdat as-Salik O9.1]. That is confirmed by Al-Shafi’i: “The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.”

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” precludes our government from discriminating against any religions. What could be a worse discrimination against a specific belief system than to legislate that it doesn’t “qualify” as a religion at all.

    The establishment clause precludes establishing a national church. The founders wisely decided against allowing the government to decide which church, if any, we will join.

    The worst course of action is that which has been followed for the last 220 years, giving a piracy cult undeserved constitutional protection. Islam has theology, cosmology, prayer, ritual & charity and it binds men permanently to Allah, so it must be a legitimate religion, right? Wrong! Islam has a mercenary mission! When reading a book one third as long as the Bible, it is difficult to perceive certain patterns. Isolating a few critically important ayat makes the pattern perceptible by removing the chaff which otherwise occludes the pattern.

    8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad) about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.” So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad), if you are believers.
    8:41. And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad)], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all things.
    8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
    48:19. And abundant spoils that they will capture. And Allâh is Ever All-Mighty, All-Wise.

    Who gets the spoils? Allah and his Messenger, who takes the top 20% with right of first selection. Since Allah is an impotent idol, Moe got the best of the loot. What did Moe want? “the good of this world” . What does Allah want? “great slaughter”! Making a great slaughter was the price of Moe’s ticket to Paradise.

    The clear pattern formed by the ayat cited above is confirmed and reinforced by several of the oral traditions of Moe’s companions.

    Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:
    The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.

    Muslim Book 019, Number 4294 []Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils []

    Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220
    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

    Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495 []When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests, []

    Allah made spoils lawful for Moe because of his weakness and humility. Allah gave Moe the keys to the treasures of the world. Allah allocated the spoils to Moe, who kept the top 20% for himself.

    How did Allah make Moe victorious? How did Allah make Moe wealthy? Is it possible that Moe was an arrogant, belligerent narcissist, unworthy & unqualified to be a Prophet? Aisha Bewley translated part of Sahih Bukhari which Khan Bowdlerized.

    Bukhari Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

    Those are the words of a pirate, not a Prophet. Moe founded a piracy cult, which wears a false mantle of religion as a camouflage and motivational tool. What legitimate religion says ‘go to war or go to Hell’?

    9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.
    9:90. And those who made excuses from the bedouins came (to you, O Prophet ) asking your permission to exempt them (from the battle), and those who had lied to Allâh and His Messenger sat at home (without asking the permission for it); a painful torment will seize those of them who disbelieve.

    Those clear and obvious ayat are confirmed by an equally clear hadith.

    Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2497:
    Narrated AbuUmamah:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: He who does not join the warlike expedition (jihad), or equip, or looks well after a warrior’s family when he is away, will be smitten by Allah with a sudden calamity. Yazid ibn Abdu Rabbihi said in his tradition: ‘before the Day of Resurrection”.

    We have a responsibility to judge individuals by their actions, not by the books they read.

    We are judging an institution, not individuals. We must judge it by its doctrines and its fruits. What legitimate religion sanctifies aggressive conquest, genocide & terrorism ? What legitimate religion enslaves people?

    O9.13 When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

    Whatever any of us believe about the tenets of the Muslim faith, it isn’t anyone’s place to judge their neighbor’s religious beliefs, and American citizens who are Muslim are entitled to the same constitutional protections as any other American – including the practice of their religion, and obviously, not being deported. This paranoia reminds me of America’s imprisoning 70,000 United States citizens during World War II – among a total of 117,000 of Japanese descent who were detained in so-called “relocation centers.” Haven’t we grown up since then?

    What we believe about the tenets of Islam is irrelevant. The reality is relevant, and it is evident on the face of the Qur’an, hadith, tafsir & Shari’ah, which form a congruent pattern of violent, genocidal aggression. In a state of weakness, with numerical inferiority, Islam is relatively docile. As its numbers increase, it becomes increasingly aggressive. In Mekkah, vastly outnumbered, Moe preached forbearance. In Medina, when he amassed an army, he preached Jihad.

    A 1400 year death toll of 270 million tells us that objection to Islam is not paranoia. Muslims form a fifth column on our own soil. Trusting them is not possible. A bullet or bomb can come from any direction at any time, as thirteen victims discovered in the metropolitan Washington D.C. area a few years ago. Since that attack, there have been several shootings, vehicular assaults and one attempted bombing.

    What’s the point of this post? Simply that people will always be people. Whether they read books with messages of peace or books that endorse wrath and vengeance, most people are usually peaceful, but circumstances sometimes push people to violence, and a few people will always be obsessively addicted to violence.

    Most Muslims do not read the Qur’an, the last statistic I saw showed a Qur’an literacy rate of 17% among men and 13% among women. They get their ideals from the Mosque, and most Mosques in America are run by Wahhabis. The fact is that Jihad is a mandatory Islamic sacrament, not an option. A Muslim can not be absolutely assured of avoiding Hell & admission to Paradise without participation in Jihad.

    If we were to discriminate against Muslims, who’s next, Scientologists? Jehovah’s Witnesses? Mormons? Japanese? I’m saddened when fundamentalists of any faith advocate wrath and vengeance, but I support everyone’s right to their books, their beliefs, and all their rights as United States citizens. This is a plea for all to put aside fear and prejudice, and to respect our American Bill of Rights and our American way of life.

    While Jonathan accuses Islam’s critics of paranoia, his penultimate paragraph is a clear example of paranoia. Why should anyone be next? Do they worship a blood thirsty demon who demands human sacrifice? Do they make sacraments of conquest, genocide & terrorism? Do they constitute a security threat? Are their doctrines inimical to liberty? Do they demand that their scripture be substituted for our Constitution?

    Obamanation: Treason in Turkey

    REMARKS BY PRESIDENT OBAMA

    TO THE TURKISH PARLIAMENT

    Turkish Grand National Assembly Complex

    Ankara, Turkey April 6, 2009

    Because the speech presents a target rich environment this post will
    concentrate on the issue of relations with Islam. I will block quote
    relevant excerpts from the prepared remarks, linking my comments with
    superscripts inserted into the excerpts.

    Now, our two democracies are confronted by an unprecedented set of challenges: An economic crisis that recognizes no borders; extremism that leads to the killing of innocent men and women and children1; strains on our energy supply and a changing climate; the proliferation of the world’s deadliest weapons; and the persistence of tragic conflict2.

    In the Middle East, we share the goal of a lasting peace between Israel and its neighbors. Let me be clear: The United States strongly supports the goal of two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security. That is a goal shared by Palestinians3,
    Israelis, and people of goodwill around the world. That is a goal that the parties agreed to in the road map and at Annapolis. That is a goal that I will actively pursue as President of the United States.

    Both must overcome longstanding passions and the politics of the moment4 to make progress towards a secure and lasting peace.

    We must reject the use of terror5, and recognize that Israel’s security concerns are legitimate.

    Now, I have made it clear to the people and leaders of the Islamic
    Republic of Iran that the United States seeks engagement based on
    mutual interest and mutual respect6. We want Iran to play its rightful
    role in the community of nations. Iran is a great civilization7. We want them to engage in the economic and political integration that brings prosperity and security. But Iran’s leaders must choose whether they will try to build a weapon8 or build a better future for their people.

    So both Turkey and the United States support a secure and united Iraq that does not serve as a safe haven for terrorists9.

    Make no mistake, though: Iraq, Turkey, and the United States face a
    common threat from terrorism10. That includes the al Qaeda terrorists who have sought to drive Iraqis apart and destroy their country. That includes the PKK. There is no excuse for terror against any nation.11 (Applause.) As President, and as a NATO ally, I pledge that you will have our support against the terrorist activities of the PKK or anyone else. These efforts will be strengthened by the continued work to build ties of cooperation between Turkey, the Iraqi government, and Iraq’s Kurdish leaders, and by your continued efforts to promote education and opportunity and democracy for the Kurdish population here inside Turkey.
    12

    Finally, we share the common goal of denying al Qaeda a safe haven in Pakistan or Afghanistan. The world has come too far to let this region backslide, and to let al Qaeda terrorists13 plot further attacks. That’s why we are committed to a more focused effort to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda14. That is why we are increasing our efforts to train Afghans to sustain their own security, and to reconcile former adversaries. That’s why we are increasing our support for the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan, so that we stand on the side not only of security, but also of opportunity and the promise of a better life.15

    I know there have been difficulties these last few years. I know that
    the trust that binds the United States and Turkey has been strained,
    and I know that strain is shared in many places where the Muslim faith is practiced. So let me say this as clearly as I can: The United States is not, and will never be, at war with Islam16. (Applause.) In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world17 is critical not just in rolling back the violent ideologies that people of all faiths reject18,
    but also to strengthen opportunity for all its people.

    I also want to be clear that America’s relationship with the Muslim
    community, the Muslim world, cannot, and will not, just be based upon opposition to terrorism19. We seek broader engagement based on mutual interest and mutual respect20. We will listen carefully, we will bridge misunderstandings, and we will seek common ground21.
    We will be respectful, even when we do not agree. We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith22, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world — including in my own country. The United States has been enriched by Muslim Americans23. Many other Americans have Muslims in their families or have lived in a Muslim-majority country –I know, because I am one of them. (Applause.)

    Our focus will be on what we can do, in partnership24
    with people across the Muslim world, to advance our common hopes and our common dreams.
    25

    There’s an old Turkish proverb: “You cannot put out fire with flames.”
    America knows this. Turkey knows this. There’s some who must be met by force, they will not compromise. But force alone cannot solve our problems, and it is no alternative to extremism26. The future must belong to those who create, not those who destroy27. That is the future we must work for, and we must work for it together.


    1. Extremism’ is a shibboleth which must be deflated. The violence perpetrated by Muslim ‘terrorists’ is an intrinsic part of orthodox Islam, founded on several
      ayat, notably 3:151, 8:12, 8:60 & 3:26. The message of those ayat is confirmed by two ahadith: Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
    2. Tragic conflict’ persists because it is perpetuated by intrinsic and immutable
      doctrines of Islam. World conquest is mandatory, not optional under 2:216, 8:39 & 9:29.
    3. The charters of the PLO and Hamas indicate otherwise, as does the familiar mantra “from the river to the sea”.
    4. The passions date back nearly 1400 years, to Moe’s rejection by Jews living in the Hijaz who scorned his plagiarized mix of paganism, Christianity and
      Judaism. Allah said he would continually torment the Jews;
      and Moe said that the Muslims could not collect their reward until they finish exterminating the Jews. There will be no peace while Islam continues to propagate hatred and incite violence.
    5. So genocide & policide are ok with President Obama as long as there is no
      terror; the means justify the ends. Islam’s attitude is “we conquered
      it, its ours, and we will reconquer it if it takes till doomsday!”.
      Click the link to the Hamas Charter in #3 and read it carefully.
    6. There is no mutual respect. Islam is contemptuous of us and all non-Muslims.
      They are obligated to punish, humiliate and subjugate us, to defeat us
      and gather us into Hell. Is there some part of 8:55 & 3:12 that President
      Obama does not comprehend?
    7. The Persian civilization was conquered by Islam; it is dead and gone, supplanted by pure, unmitigated evil which inculcates hatred and incites violence.
      Cyrus the Great permitted rebuilding the Temple at Jerusalem. Islam demands the destruction of Israel. President Obama seems to be oblivious to the difference.
    8. That decision has been made, irrevocably. They must destroy Israel, and they need the bomb to accomplish that tactical objective.
    9. If it is Islamic, it is a safe haven for terrorists. Islam and terrorism are one and the same. Moe was a terrorist, by his own admission, cited and linked in #1. Shari’ah is
      the primary source of law for the new constitution of Iraq. Get a clue.
    10. Muslims practicing takfir will terrorize anyone they perceive as weak; unable or unwilling to effectively retaliate. Terrorism is intrinsic to Islam; the rule, not an exception. The texts linked in #1 make that perfectly clear.
    11. Is there any excuse for conquest, rape, pillage, plunder & enslavement with or without inflicting terror? Please follow the links in #1 & #2.
    12. Education, opportunity, democracy etc. are irrelevant. Terrorism is a function of
      doctrines, not grievances.
    13. Al-Qaeda means “the base”. Ummah al-Islamiya is the base of the pyramid of Islam. Islamic law requires a minimum of one military expedition against Kufar
      in every year. That requirement predates Abd al-Wahhab & co. Read chapter 9 of Book O of Umdat as-Salik.
    14. So long as Islam exists, al-Qaeda can not be defeated, its fallen martyrs
      will always be replaced and resupplied.
    15. They don’t want opportunity and a better life, they want to conquer the entire world, obtaining Allah’s approval and subsequent admission to the celestial bordello. Shari’ah is the primary source of law for Afghanistan’s new
      constitution. Get a clue.
    16. Islam is at war against Dar ul-Harb: the entire non-Muslim world; wherever
      Allah’s writ does not rule. Follow the links in #2 and #13; read O9.8 & 9.9 Get a clue.
    17. We have no partnership with Muslims, it is explicitly forbidden by several ayat including 3:118, 5:51, 58:22, & 60:1.
    18. Violence is not part of an external ideology, it is intrinsic to Islam! Read the ayat linked in #2 and get a clue. Islam does not reject violence, it mandates it: “Jihad
      is ordained for you”.
    19. Good idea; we should also consider Jihad, genocide, misogyny and subjugation of Kufar, each and every one of which is ample cause for rejecting Islam.
    20. There is no mutual respect. Refer to #6.
    21. There is no common ground with Islam. Islam declares Allah to be the creator of the earth and everything on it; therefore sovereign over it and us. Allah
      has delegated to Islam the right to be regent over the entire world.
      Theologically, Islam denies the divinity, heritage, death & resurrection of Jesus Christ and co-opts him as a genocidal warmonger. These facts are fully documented in another blog post: The Defamation of Jesus Christ.
    22. What does President Obama appreciate about Islam besides the sound of the Adhan at sunset? Could it be the 270 million untimely deaths it has caused?
    23. Contributions made by individuals who may be Muslim in name only are not a legitimate source of pride for Islam.
    24. Refer to #17.
    25. Common dreams? Do we dream of world conquest; ruling and dominating the entire world? If you doubt me, read my blog post: ROPMA.
    26. Extremism is a shibboleth. Standard, off the shelf orthodox Islam is violent because it is a demonic mandate to genocidal conquest using terror as a battle
      tactic. There is no alternative to war when we are attacked by Islam
    27. Islam destroys, it does not create. Allah has pronounced an execration
      against the Muslims if they ever abandon Jihad in favor of productive pursuits.

    Big Lies in High Places

    Many Voices: understanding the debate about preventing violent extremism – Hazel Blears MP
    Source: DCLG
    Published Friday, 27 February, 2009 – 09:28
    British Member of Parliament Hazel Blears spoke to the London School of Economics, making several idiotic statements. At the conclusion of her remarks, she said this.

    And if we are to change minds and win this debate, it will not be through restricting our engagement to a select few, but through bringing in new voices: not through concealing what we believe in, but through making our arguments confidently: and not through acquiescing with those with whom we disagree, but through being robust in our challenge to them.

    Thank you for listening – I welcome your questions and comments.

    M.P. Blears probably won’t see my comments, and surely would not welcome them. While I agree with much of what she said, I find these expressions of idiotic ignorance too egregious to let pass without condemnation.

    Barack Obama used his Inaugural Address in February to tell the world:

    “Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred.”

    So what is this ‘far-reaching network of violence and hatred’?

    It is rooted in a shifting mosaic of international groupings, with their origins in the struggle of the mujahedeen against the Soviets in Afghanistan, in the refugee camps and some madrassas on the Afghan-Pakistan border, in Algeria’s political unrest of the 1980s and 1990s, and in the war in Iraq.

    Islamic Jihad, with its tactics of genocide & terrorism, flows directly from Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence. None of the major schools of Shari’ah rejects the Jihad imperatives found in Surah Al-Anfal & At-Taubah. The congruent pattern of speech & conduct formed by Moe’s recitation & sunnah is reflected in Shari’ah. Let doubters & dissenters turn first to the two surahs above named, next to Riyad us-Saliheen Book 11, Chapter 234: Obligation of Jihad and finally to Umdat as-Salik Book O, Chapter 9.

    There is the obvious danger that we say ‘Islamism’ but people hear ‘Islam’ or ‘Islamic’, especially as the word translates poorly into other languages such as Arabic. Even in English, where the two words are distinct, many people lack the political literacy to distinguish between a political ideology dubbed by some as Islamism and Islam itself. There are plenty of people, for example the far right in this country, or Geert Wilders’ outfit in Holland, who would wish to conflate the two in order to stir up race hate.

    Islam is not a race, it is a war cult which has enslaved members of several races. Arabs, Asians,Blacks, and Europeans became Muslims at sword point. Many of their descendants remain Muslim out of tradition and filial piety; they have known nothing else and would be dispossessed, tortured and killed as required by Islamic law if they abandoned Islam. Moe’s abominable creation is classified as a Deen, way of life, which encompasses all human activity. It conflates the spiritual & temporal. It prescribes certain duties which must be performed; Jihad: the military conquest of the world, is one of them.

    A second trap is that to talk of ‘Islamism’ suggests there is a unified, single movement. But there is no more a unified Islamism than there is a single socialism, or a single conservatism, or a single liberalism.

    While maintenance of perfect uniformity is nearly impossible, Islam has a standard, which was set by Moe in his recitation and exemplified in his sunnah for all Muslims to obey and emulate. Which schismatic group rejects and denies the Qur’an? What Allah said about Jihad, terror & genocide is law. What did he say about them? Unless you read the Qur’an,. you will have no clue. To complete the pattern which forms Shari’ah, you must know what Moe said and did about them, from his sunnah.

    For example, Al-Qaeda is in conflict with the Muslim Brotherhood over fundamental questions such as the nature of the state, and the duty of the individual to fight the perceived enemies of Islam.

    Does the ignorant speaker know her head from her butt? For certain she does not know that Al-Qaeda is a branch of Al-Ikhwan Al-Islamiyya. Has she read the writings of Hasan Al-Banna or Abdullah Azzam? Has she read the Charter of Hamas, which includes the Al-Ikhwan’s motto? No, instead she pontificates from atop the pedestal of ignorance.

    A third trap is to assume that all Islamists are terrorists. Some groups specifically oppose violence but have religious views which are very conservative and can conflict with other values we share in society.

    It is not possible to be a Muslim and oppose violence & terrorism, both of which are intrinsic sacraments of Islam. Such opponents are branded hypocrites by Islam’s demon and founder; accursed, to be fought and ushered into Hell along with us Kuffar. Islam is all or nothing; you can not pick and choose.

    A belief in the supremacy of the Muslim people, in a divine duty to bring the world under the control of hegemonic Islam, in the establishment of a theocratic Caliphate, and in the undemocratic imposition of theocratic law on whole societies: these are the defining and common characteristics of the disparate strands of this ideology here and around the world.

    The items in that list flow directly from Allah’s word, as recited by Moe and codified in the Qur’an; exemplified by his sunnah. They are standard Islam, not exceptional ism.

    You can’t ignore the facts that this ideology is rooted in a twisted reading of Islam. The academics, scholars and imams I meet to discuss these issues tell me that the message of Islam is one of peace; and the followers of Islam I meet oppose the single narrative promulgated by Al-Qaeda, and certainly oppose violence. Indeed, the vast majority are proud of their faith and their nationality, see no conflict or contradiction between being British and being Muslim, and are an integral part of the economic, cultural and social life of their neighbourhood and the country, giving the lie to the ideas of division and difference that lie at the heart of extremist ideology.

    Your facts are fallacies! Allah’s commands are contained in clear verses whose meanings are obvious. You do not know this because you have not read 3:7; nor have you read Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of 3:7.
    The message of Islam is one of peace: the peace pertaining after the violent conquest of the entire world! “Fight them until”, “fight those who”,”strive hard and fight with your lives…””made a great slaughter”, “killed and wounded many of them”. Hell yes, a religion of peace indeed. The ignorant fool has not read the Qur’an. Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir will make it easy for you; it presents the ayat, their translations and the hadith which exemplify them all in one compact text. Read them and understand the truth.

    This is what Islam truly means in practice for the vast majority: a personal and spiritual faith matched by a sense of social responsibility, motivating people to do good for their neighbourhood and community.

    The vast majority of Muslims know little of Islam beyond what they have been told by the Imam or Mullah. One recent survey reported that only 13% of Muslims have read the Qur’an.

    With groups which call for or support terrorist acts there is no room whatsoever for debate, only vociferous opposition.

    There is one such group: Islam. Have you read 3:151, 8:12, 8:60, 33:26-27, 59:2 and 59:13? Why not? Here is your chance, click the links and read them. Because you have not read the hadith, you did not know that Moe was a terrorist. He did not just preach it, he practiced it. Read them and curse Islam!
    Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331, Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220

    If you will make good use of the links I have provided in this post, you can access the Qur’an & tafsir and four hadith collections along with an assortment of hadith with commentary and the handbook of Islamic law. If you will not take the time and exert the effort necessary to comprehend the reality of Islam, you will surely fall prey to the liars & ignoramuses who pontificate from the pedestals of al-takeyya & ignorance. The most egregious ayat, along with relevant tafsir have been compiled with the most egregious hadith and Shari’ah, into a Windows Help File: EgregiousAyat.chm. Download it and start learning.

    Islamic Supremacism #3

    This third episode opens perversely, with a story of Jewish supremacy. Allah made the Jews superior to the surrounding Arabs, but because they rejected Moe, he will bring them lower.

    Musa, the son of `Imran, peace be upon him, whom Allah spoke to directly, (perhaps they may reflect.) and avoid Bal`am’s behavior, for Allah has given the Jews knowledge and made them superior to the bedouins surrounding them. He gave them the description of Muhammad which would allow them to recognize him, as they recognize their own children. They, among people, have the most right to follow, aid and support Muhammad , in obedience to their Prophets who informed them of him and commanded them to follow him. Therefore, whoever among them defies the knowledge in their Books or hides it from the servants, Allah will place disgrace on him in this life, followed by humiliation in the Hereafter.

    Story Bal`am bin Ba`ura

    Observe these two tafsir fragments which mention certain followers being made superior.

    (55. And (remember) when Allah said: “O `Isa! I will take you and raise you to Myself and purify ﴿save﴾ you from those who disbelieve, and I will make those who follow you superior to those who disbelieve till the Day of Resurrection. Then you will return to Me and I will judge between you in the matters in which you used to dispute.” (56. “As to those who disbelieve, I will punish them with severe torment in this world and in the Hereafter, and they will have no helpers.”) (57. And as for those who believe and do righteous good deeds, Allah will pay them their reward in full. And Allah does not like the wrongdoers.) The Jews Plot to Kill `Isa

    (And I will make those who follow you superior to those who disbelieve till the Day of Resurrection. Then you will return to Me and I will judge between you in the matters in which you used to dispute. As to those who disbelieve, I will punish them with a severe torment in this world and in the Hereafter, and they will have no helpers.)

    This is what Allah did to the Jews who disbelieved in `Isa and the Christians who went to the extreme over him. Allah tormented them in this life; they were killed, captured, and lost their wealth and kingdoms. Their torment in the Hereafter is even worse and more severe, (And they have no Waq (defender or protector) against Allah) ﴿13:34﴾. (And as for those who believe and do righteous good deeds, Allah will pay them their reward in full) in this life, with victory and domination, and in the Hereafter, with Paradise and high grades, Threatening the Disbelievers with Torment in This Life and the Hereafter

    In 3:55, Allah tells Jesus that his followers will be made superior to disbelievers. Both of these tafsir share that expression. Pay close attention to the last two sentences of Threatening the Disbelievers.

    1. Who are the “true followers” of Jesus?
    2. What happened to the disbelievers?
    3. Who did it to them?
    4. What reward did Allah give the Muslims in this life?

    If you can’t answer those second and third questions, review 33:26-27. Here are some highlights from those ayat.

    • …Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
    • He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden…

    If you can answer the fourth question above, you know the fountainhead of Islamic supremacism: Allah’s reward of victory & domination. He made the Jews superior, they wasted their inheritance so he transfered it to the Muslims.

    Allah said:

    3:139. So do not become weak (against your enemy), nor be sad, and you will be superior (in victory) if you are indeed (true) believers.[ The Wisdom Behind the Losses Muslims Suffered During Uhud]

    Now that we have seen the spring from which Islamic supremacism flows, let us examine its consequences. The consequence of Islamic supremacism is that Kuffar are killed, lose their wealth, families, lands and kingdoms. Conquest and everything it carries with it is a consequence of supremacism & triumphalism.

    Loss of liberty is one of those consequences. Conquered atheists & pagans are killed or enslaved; “people of the book” are subjugated and extorted. Because Allah is sovereign, he alone has the right to rule, which he delegated to Moe and his Caliphs. Examine the Introduction of Book 20 of Sahih Muslim. I have picked out a few references to the Qur’an.

    • 12:40. “You do not worship besides Him but only names which you have named (forged), you and your fathers, for which Allah has sent down no authority. The command (or the judgement) is for none but Allah. He has commanded that you worship none but Him (i.e. His Monotheism), that is the (true) straight religion, but most men know not.
    • 7:3. [Say (O Muhammad ) to these idolaters (pagan Arabs) of your folk:] Follow what has been sent down unto you from your Lord (the Qur’an and Prophet Muhammad’s Sunnah), and follow not any Auliya’ (protectors and helpers, etc. who order you to associate partners in worship with Allah), besides Him (Allah). Little do you remember!
    • 5:44. Verily, We did send down the Taurat (Torah) [to Musa (Moses)], therein was guidance and light, by which the Prophets, who submitted themselves to Allah’s Will, judged the Jews. And the rabbis and the priests [too judged the Jews by the Taurat (Torah) after those Prophets] for to them was entrusted the protection of Allah’s Book, and they were witnesses thereto. Therefore fear not men but fear Me (O Jews) and sell not My Verses for a miserable price. And whosoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed, such are the Kafirun (i.e. disbelievers – of a lesser degree as they do not act on Allah’s Laws ).
    • 24:55. Allah has promised those among you who believe, and do righteous good deeds, that He will certainly grant them succession to (the present rulers) in the earth, as He granted it to those before them, and that He will grant them the authority to practise their religion, that which He has chosen for them (i.e. Islam). And He will surely give them in exchange a safe security after their fear (provided) they (believers) worship Me and do not associate anything (in worship) with Me. But whoever disbelieved after this, they are the Fasiqun (rebellious, disobedient to Allah).

    One ayeh distills this down to its essence; lets turn to it now.

    • 33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.

    Allah and his Messenger have the first and final word; their decision is final in any matter; you can’t question it and must obey. Moe rules the world.

    Previous installments in this series:

    1. Islamic Supremacism #1
    2. Islamic Supremacism #2