Michigan State University and Old Blue Jacket ROCK!


This has been VERIFIED by Snopes:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/wichman.asp

********************

Hooray for Michigan State University (The Spartans) and Professor Wichman!!!

Well, what do we have here? Looks like a small case of some people being able to dish it out but not take it. Let’s start at the top. The story begins at Michigan State University with a mechanical engineering professor named Indrek Wichman.

Wichman sent an email to the Muslim Student’s Association. The email was in response to the students protest of the Danish cartoons that portrayed the prophet mohammed as a terrorist. The group had complained the cartoons were “hate speech”.

Enter Professor Wichman:

Dear Moslem Association:

As a professor of Mechanical Engineering here at MSU I intend to protest your protest. I am offended not by cartoons, but by more mundane things like beheadings of civilians, cowardly attacks on public buildings, suicide murders, murders of Catholic priests (the latest in Turkey ), burnings of Christian churches, the continued persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt, the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslims, the rapes of Scandinavian girls and women (called “whores” in your culture), the murder of film directors in Holland, and the rioting and looting in Paris, France.

This is what offends me, a soft-spoken person and academic, and many, many of my colleagues. I counsel you dissatisfied, aggressive, brutal, and uncivilized slave-trading Muslims to be very aware of this as you proceed with your infantile “protests.” If you do not like the values of the West-see the First Amendment-you are free to leave.

I hope for God’s sake that most of you choose that option.

Please return to your ancestral homelands and build them up yourselves instead of troubling Americans.

Cordially,
I. S. Wichman
Professor of Mechanical Engineering

Well! As you can imagine, the Muslim group at the university didn’t like this too well. They’re demanding Wichman be reprimanded and impose mandatory diversity training for faculty and a seminar on hate and discrimination for all freshmen. How nice. But now the Michigan chapter of CAIR has jumped into the fray. CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, apparently doesn’t believe the good professor had the right to express his opinion.

For its part, the university is standing its ground. They say the email was private, and they don’t intend to publicly condemn his remarks. That will probably change. Wichman says he never intended the email to be made public and wouldn’t have used the same strong language if he’d known it was going to get out.

How’s the left going to handle this one? If you’re in favor of the Freedom of Speech as in the case of Ward Churchill, will the same protections be demanded for Indrek Wichman? I doubt it.

We ARE at war.

I think Professor Wichman sums it up quite nicely.

Another site brought to my attention by Snooper at A Newt One is called Old Blue Jacket and he has a great line of anti-hillary stuff as well as some common sense articles on this issue. I’m “borrowing” some of OBJ’s pictures and text, but you really should go over there yourself and check out his whole site.

I swiped this from Old Blue Jacket who “lifted it from Grouchy Old Cripple, and he stole it from Boortz” (I’ve added my own emphasis):

Muslim outrage huh. OK … let’s do a little historical review. Just some low lights:

1. Muslims fly commercial airliners into buildings in New York City. No Muslim outrage.
2. Muslim officials block the exit where school girls are trying to escape a burning building because their faces were exposed. No Muslim outrage.
3. Muslims cut off the heads of three teenaged girls on their way to school in Indonesia. A Christian school. No Muslim outrage.
4. Muslims murder teachers trying to teach Muslim children in Iraq. No Muslim outrage.
5. Muslims murder over 80 tourists with car bombs outside cafes and hotels in Egypt. No Muslim outrage.
6. A Muslim attacks a missionary children’s school in India. Kills six. No Muslim outrage.
7. Muslims slaughter hundreds of children and teachers in Beslan, Russia. Muslims shoot children in the back. No Muslim outrage.
8. Let’s go way back. Muslims kidnap and kill athletes at the Munich Summer Olympics. No Muslim outrage.
9. Muslims fire rocket-propelled grenades into schools full of children in Israel. No Muslim outrage.
10. Muslims murder more than 50 commuters in attacks on London subways and buses. Over 700 are injured. No Muslim outrage.
11. Muslims massacre dozens of innocents at a Passover Seder. No Muslim outrage.
12. Muslims murder innocent vacationers in Bali. No Muslim outrage.
13. Muslim newspapers publish anti-Semitic cartoons. No Muslim outrage.
14. Muslims are involved, on one side or the other, in almost every one of the 125+ shooting wars around the world. No Muslim outrage.
15. Muslims beat the charred bodies of Western civilians with their shoes, then hang them from a bridge. No Muslim outrage.
16. Newspapers in Denmark and Norway publish cartoons depicting Mohammed. Muslims are outraged.

Dead children. Dead tourists. Dead teachers. Dead doctors and nurses. Death, destruction and mayhem around the world at the hands of Muslims .. no Muslim outrage .. but publish a cartoon depicting Mohammed with a bomb in his turban and all hell breaks loose.


Come on, is this really about cartoons? They’re rampaging and burning flags. They’re looking for Europeans to kidnap. They’re threatening innkeepers and generally raising holy Muslim hell not because of any outrage over a cartoon. They’re outraged because it is part of the Islamic jihadist culture to be outraged. You don’t really need a reason. You just need an excuse. Wandering around, destroying property, murdering children, firing guns into the air and feigning outrage over the slightest perceived insult is to a jihadist what tailgating is to a Steeler’s fan.

I know and understand that these bloodthirsty murderers do not represent the majority of the world’s Muslims. When, though, do they become outraged? When do they take to the streets to express their outrage at the radicals who are making their religion the object of worldwide hatred and ridicule? Islamic writer Salman Rushdie wrote of these silent Muslims in a New York Times article three years ago. “As their ancient, deeply civilized culture of love, art and philosophical reflection is hijacked by paranoiacs, racists, liars, male supremacists, tyrants, fanatics and violence junkies, why are they not screaming?”

Indeed. Why not?

Now, every time I post anything remotely resembling the truth, the trolls come out from the left and from muslims trying to “sway” me, and on and on.

Let me state, UNEQUIVOCALLY, I don’t want to hear it. I’ve got an on-going series here, posted by Ben, called “Myth vs. Fact”. I have another series, also posted by Ben, called “Know Thine Enemy” as well as an entire section called “Exposing Islam”. I am NOT swayed by the lying cant and hyperbole of “religion of peace”. I have asked REPEATEDLY for verses to counteract what has been posted (as I will GLADLY give equal time) and been met with…silence. So, I don’t want to hear it. You can find the series’ and the sites in the sidebar–they have their own sections.

Nor do I want anyone providing me a link to “Muslims Against Sharia”…they have been exposed as the CAIR front group they are in previous posts of mine (here and here), wherein they show themselves as incapable of arguing definitely for the case of “a religion of peace” and indeed degenerate into the frothing, rabid, terrorist lovers they are. They refuse to answer point blank questions and keep referring you to their website (if I wanted to go read the site–which I have–I would do so.). The fact is they can’t defend their purported stand in a coherent, educated fashion for themselves, degenerate into profanity and screech go to their site. No, answer the damn questions off the cuff as an educated, passionate, dedicated person would.

It’s about time Americans woke up to the dangers of appeasing this degenerate, misogynistic, child molesting advocating, violence loving, barbaric zealotry style of an ideology as well as the fact it is no more a religion than my dog’s bowel movements. It is in fact a societal ideology and not a religion at all. Further, take a good look at every place these “peace loving” people have claimed or are in the process of claiming (Britain comes to mind).

While they may have contributed to science and the arts in ancient times, they have become irrelevant since oh, say the 7th century. Every place they live looks like a moonscape from their destruction, bombings, war, etc. They are not productive in the least–except in procreating and indulging in child abuse in their methods of indoctrinating the next generation into the hate.


They are a blight on the face of the earth and until the “calm moderates” decide to speak out against the violence, they have no one to blame but themselves when they are lumped in with the more violent followers. How can we know they are truly “moderate and peace loving” if we don’t hear from them–definitively and en masse?

If there are moderates out there who want a forum to let their voices be heard, I’m more than happy to provide that forum and equal time. Until that time comes, until someone steps forward and provides me the passages I’ve requested repeatedly, until then–don’t expect me to distinguish between the so-called radicals and the so-called moderates. Until then, they are one and the same.

To you islamists out there, know this: I will NOT present my neck to you for chopping, nor any of my limbs. You’ll have to fight me for I will not bow down and worship your rock. You will never convert this Catholic to your abomination of society. I will not submit.

THIS is islam:

And this is the left “on islam” and full of appeasement:


ANY QUESTIONS?

Advertisements

Michigan State University and Old Blue Jacket ROCK!


This has been VERIFIED by Snopes:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/wichman.asp

********************

Hooray for Michigan State University (The Spartans) and Professor Wichman!!!

Well, what do we have here? Looks like a small case of some people being able to dish it out but not take it. Let’s start at the top. The story begins at Michigan State University with a mechanical engineering professor named Indrek Wichman.

Wichman sent an email to the Muslim Student’s Association. The email was in response to the students protest of the Danish cartoons that portrayed the prophet mohammed as a terrorist. The group had complained the cartoons were “hate speech”.

Enter Professor Wichman:

Dear Moslem Association:

As a professor of Mechanical Engineering here at MSU I intend to protest your protest. I am offended not by cartoons, but by more mundane things like beheadings of civilians, cowardly attacks on public buildings, suicide murders, murders of Catholic priests (the latest in Turkey ), burnings of Christian churches, the continued persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt, the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslims, the rapes of Scandinavian girls and women (called “whores” in your culture), the murder of film directors in Holland, and the rioting and looting in Paris, France.

This is what offends me, a soft-spoken person and academic, and many, many of my colleagues. I counsel you dissatisfied, aggressive, brutal, and uncivilized slave-trading Muslims to be very aware of this as you proceed with your infantile “protests.” If you do not like the values of the West-see the First Amendment-you are free to leave.

I hope for God’s sake that most of you choose that option.

Please return to your ancestral homelands and build them up yourselves instead of troubling Americans.

Cordially,
I. S. Wichman
Professor of Mechanical Engineering

Well! As you can imagine, the Muslim group at the university didn’t like this too well. They’re demanding Wichman be reprimanded and impose mandatory diversity training for faculty and a seminar on hate and discrimination for all freshmen. How nice. But now the Michigan chapter of CAIR has jumped into the fray. CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, apparently doesn’t believe the good professor had the right to express his opinion.

For its part, the university is standing its ground. They say the email was private, and they don’t intend to publicly condemn his remarks. That will probably change. Wichman says he never intended the email to be made public and wouldn’t have used the same strong language if he’d known it was going to get out.

How’s the left going to handle this one? If you’re in favor of the Freedom of Speech as in the case of Ward Churchill, will the same protections be demanded for Indrek Wichman? I doubt it.

We ARE at war.

I think Professor Wichman sums it up quite nicely.

Another site brought to my attention by Snooper at A Newt One is called Old Blue Jacket and he has a great line of anti-hillary stuff as well as some common sense articles on this issue. I’m “borrowing” some of OBJ’s pictures and text, but you really should go over there yourself and check out his whole site.

I swiped this from Old Blue Jacket who “lifted it from Grouchy Old Cripple, and he stole it from Boortz” (I’ve added my own emphasis):

Muslim outrage huh. OK … let’s do a little historical review. Just some low lights:

1. Muslims fly commercial airliners into buildings in New York City. No Muslim outrage.
2. Muslim officials block the exit where school girls are trying to escape a burning building because their faces were exposed. No Muslim outrage.
3. Muslims cut off the heads of three teenaged girls on their way to school in Indonesia. A Christian school. No Muslim outrage.
4. Muslims murder teachers trying to teach Muslim children in Iraq. No Muslim outrage.
5. Muslims murder over 80 tourists with car bombs outside cafes and hotels in Egypt. No Muslim outrage.
6. A Muslim attacks a missionary children’s school in India. Kills six. No Muslim outrage.
7. Muslims slaughter hundreds of children and teachers in Beslan, Russia. Muslims shoot children in the back. No Muslim outrage.
8. Let’s go way back. Muslims kidnap and kill athletes at the Munich Summer Olympics. No Muslim outrage.
9. Muslims fire rocket-propelled grenades into schools full of children in Israel. No Muslim outrage.
10. Muslims murder more than 50 commuters in attacks on London subways and buses. Over 700 are injured. No Muslim outrage.
11. Muslims massacre dozens of innocents at a Passover Seder. No Muslim outrage.
12. Muslims murder innocent vacationers in Bali. No Muslim outrage.
13. Muslim newspapers publish anti-Semitic cartoons. No Muslim outrage.
14. Muslims are involved, on one side or the other, in almost every one of the 125+ shooting wars around the world. No Muslim outrage.
15. Muslims beat the charred bodies of Western civilians with their shoes, then hang them from a bridge. No Muslim outrage.
16. Newspapers in Denmark and Norway publish cartoons depicting Mohammed. Muslims are outraged.

Dead children. Dead tourists. Dead teachers. Dead doctors and nurses. Death, destruction and mayhem around the world at the hands of Muslims .. no Muslim outrage .. but publish a cartoon depicting Mohammed with a bomb in his turban and all hell breaks loose.


Come on, is this really about cartoons? They’re rampaging and burning flags. They’re looking for Europeans to kidnap. They’re threatening innkeepers and generally raising holy Muslim hell not because of any outrage over a cartoon. They’re outraged because it is part of the Islamic jihadist culture to be outraged. You don’t really need a reason. You just need an excuse. Wandering around, destroying property, murdering children, firing guns into the air and feigning outrage over the slightest perceived insult is to a jihadist what tailgating is to a Steeler’s fan.

I know and understand that these bloodthirsty murderers do not represent the majority of the world’s Muslims. When, though, do they become outraged? When do they take to the streets to express their outrage at the radicals who are making their religion the object of worldwide hatred and ridicule? Islamic writer Salman Rushdie wrote of these silent Muslims in a New York Times article three years ago. “As their ancient, deeply civilized culture of love, art and philosophical reflection is hijacked by paranoiacs, racists, liars, male supremacists, tyrants, fanatics and violence junkies, why are they not screaming?”

Indeed. Why not?

Now, every time I post anything remotely resembling the truth, the trolls come out from the left and from muslims trying to “sway” me, and on and on.

Let me state, UNEQUIVOCALLY, I don’t want to hear it. I’ve got an on-going series here, posted by Ben, called “Myth vs. Fact”. I have another series, also posted by Ben, called “Know Thine Enemy” as well as an entire section called “Exposing Islam”. I am NOT swayed by the lying cant and hyperbole of “religion of peace”. I have asked REPEATEDLY for verses to counteract what has been posted (as I will GLADLY give equal time) and been met with…silence. So, I don’t want to hear it. You can find the series’ and the sites in the sidebar–they have their own sections.

Nor do I want anyone providing me a link to “Muslims Against Sharia”…they have been exposed as the CAIR front group they are in previous posts of mine (here and here), wherein they show themselves as incapable of arguing definitely for the case of “a religion of peace” and indeed degenerate into the frothing, rabid, terrorist lovers they are. They refuse to answer point blank questions and keep referring you to their website (if I wanted to go read the site–which I have–I would do so.). The fact is they can’t defend their purported stand in a coherent, educated fashion for themselves, degenerate into profanity and screech go to their site. No, answer the damn questions off the cuff as an educated, passionate, dedicated person would.

It’s about time Americans woke up to the dangers of appeasing this degenerate, misogynistic, child molesting advocating, violence loving, barbaric zealotry style of an ideology as well as the fact it is no more a religion than my dog’s bowel movements. It is in fact a societal ideology and not a religion at all. Further, take a good look at every place these “peace loving” people have claimed or are in the process of claiming (Britain comes to mind).

While they may have contributed to science and the arts in ancient times, they have become irrelevant since oh, say the 7th century. Every place they live looks like a moonscape from their destruction, bombings, war, etc. They are not productive in the least–except in procreating and indulging in child abuse in their methods of indoctrinating the next generation into the hate.


They are a blight on the face of the earth and until the “calm moderates” decide to speak out against the violence, they have no one to blame but themselves when they are lumped in with the more violent followers. How can we know they are truly “moderate and peace loving” if we don’t hear from them–definitively and en masse?

If there are moderates out there who want a forum to let their voices be heard, I’m more than happy to provide that forum and equal time. Until that time comes, until someone steps forward and provides me the passages I’ve requested repeatedly, until then–don’t expect me to distinguish between the so-called radicals and the so-called moderates. Until then, they are one and the same.

To you islamists out there, know this: I will NOT present my neck to you for chopping, nor any of my limbs. You’ll have to fight me for I will not bow down and worship your rock. You will never convert this Catholic to your abomination of society. I will not submit.

THIS is islam:

And this is the left “on islam” and full of appeasement:


ANY QUESTIONS?

Usama bin Laden: As-Samu-Alaikum!!

I have found transcripts of the latest bin Laden screed here:http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/070907_bin_laden_transcript.pdf
[scanned text, not properly aligned when scanned; low resolution]
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296065,00.html
[scanned text, distracting pen marks]The screed is a taunting mockery; full of deception and projection.

Regarding the Iraq theater of war:

“There are two solutions to stopping it. One is from our side, and it is to escalate the fighting and killing against you. This is our duty, and our brothers are carrying it out,” “The second solution is from your side,” he said. “I invite you to embrace Islam.”

What does that mean?

  • escalate the fighting and killing against you. This is our duty, and our brothers are carrying it out, is a clear indication of bin Laden’s intent to attack us again.
  • I invite you to embrace Islam. That is the fulfillment of an essential Islamic legal requirement:

The Reliance of the Traveller. Version 1.06 – By Ahmad Ibn Naqib Al-Misri
BOOK O: JUSTICE >> Chapter O-9.0: Jihad


O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

Having met that requirement of Sharia, bin Laden now considers any further attack on us to be fully justified; in compliance with Islamic law.

Bin Laden also said: “Peace be upon he who follows the guidance.” For the benefit of the clueless among you, here is where he got that expression:

LETTER TO KHUSRO PERWEZ, EMPEROR OF FARS
In the name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful.
From Muhammad, Prophet of Allah to Kisra, King of Fars
May peace be on him who follows the guidance, believes in Allah and his Prophet. I testify that there:is none worthy of worship except Allah, who is alone and without an associate and Muhammad is His Servant and Prophet. Allah has made me a Prophet and sent me for the entire world, in order that I may infuse the fear of Allah in every living person. Accept Islam and be secure. If you refuse, the sins of all the Zoroastrians shall be your responsibility. Seal: Allah’s Prophet Muhammad

Muhammad dictated and dispatched many extortion letters, which you can read at alquraan.net, by clicking the extortion letter reproduced above. What does it mean?

  • May peace be on him who follows the guidance means that Muhammad would make war on anyone who refused to comply with his demand. This is a token of supreme arrogance.
  • in order that I may infuse the fear of Allah in every living person refers to two ayat: 3:151 & 8:12 which sanctify & mandate terrorism. They are reproduced below, together with an ahadith which confirms their meaning. If any doubt remains, consult 33:26-27 to see the practical application.
  • Accept Islam and be secure means: If you don’t accept Islam, Muhammad will make war on you.

Of course Muhammad confirmed this in an ahadith.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 267:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet said, “Khosrau will be ruined, and there will be no Khosrau after him, and Caesar will surely be ruined and there will be no Caesar after him, and you will spend their treasures in Allah’s Cause.” He called, “War is deceit’.

Did Muhammad follow through on his threat? No, he died before getting around to it. But Umar took care of it. These excerpts from a long ahadith will make it plain for you. [Click the link to read the whole thing.]

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386:
Narrated Jubair bin Haiya:
‘Umar sent the Muslims to the great countries to fight the pagans…. When we reached the land of the enemy, the representative of Khosrau came out with forty-thousand warriors, and an interpreter got up saying, “Let one of you talk to me!” Al-Mughira replied, “Ask whatever you wish.” The other asked, “Who are you?”… Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

Persia was not originally Islamic. How did you think it was Islamized?

The bottom line: bin Laden has made an extortionate demand, threatening us with further mass casualty attacks if we do not embrace Islam. We need to respond by telling that worshipper of Satan to go to Hell and be damned. We need to declare Mecca as default target for immediate retaliation in the event of any further attack by Islam. For this purpose I urge and exhort you to sign the Target: Mecca petition, send it to comments@whitehouse.gov and to all your friends. Exhort them to follow suit. Do it now, before the next attack! If not now, when? If not us, who?

Bukhari Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).

8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Tell It As It Is!!!

I have a standing search for articles about the Moderate Muslim Majority Rejecting Terrorism. Today the search reported this article, from which I have excerpted two brilliant gems of idiocy.

More Muslims reject violence

August 2, 2007

“Overall, majorities in 15 of 16 Muslim publics surveyed say that suicide bombings can be rarely or never justified,” according to the report. Bangladesh, Indonesia, Jordan, Lebanon and Pakistan registered the most impressive drops, compared to 2002 numbers.

Every Muslim who loudly and consistently condemns acts of violence by those who distort the true meaning and purpose of Islam, including bin Laden, deserves praise.

    So, suicide bombings ain’t justified. Whoopie!!! Why didn’t the Pew Global Attitudes Project survey attitudes toward bombings, shootings, knifing and rocket attacks that do not involve the death of the perpetrator?  Oh, but they condemn attacks on innocent civilians! Great! Only Muslim civilians are innocent.  Disbelievers are Kuffar: rebels against Allah; najis, not innocent. Our abode is Hell and its every Muslim’s duty to send us there.

    Exactly who are those who “distort the true meaning and purpose of Islam” ?  What is the true meaning and purpose of Islam?  The meaning is surrender.  The purpose is the personal empowerment and emolument of Muhammad and his Caliphs.

    “Moderate Muslims” swear that aggression, genocide and terrorism are haram; they have no place in Islam. Should we believe them, or should we believe Allah and his Messenger?  What did Allah and his Messenger say about this subject?

  • 2:216 Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
  • 8:39 And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
  • 9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

The “Moderate Muslims” tell us that the lesser Jihad is haram. Allah said that it is ordained for Muslims.Allah said fight them until only Allah is worshiped; until they submit and pay tribute.  Muhammad said that he was “ordered to fight the people” until they submit, when their blood and property will become sacred to Muslims. Muhammad declared open season on us!

  • 3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
  • 8:12 Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.
  • 33:26 And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 33:27 And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.
  • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220: …”I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.“…

So terror is haram? Why then did Allah sanctify and command it? Why did Muhammad practice it? Why did Muhammad brag about it?

  • 8:67 It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
  • Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390:
    Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
    I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

So genocide is haram:  “made a great slaughter”?  Muhammad had 800 prisoners of war and their adolescent sons decapitated. Yeah, right: genocide is haram in Islam!

What should Muslims do about it? Let us consult the standard handbook of Islamic law: Reliance of the Traveler to see what the Caliph should do.

  • O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
    The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,
    “Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

That’s awful! Lets get a second opinion!

  • Al-Shafi’i (God have mercy on him) said: “The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.”

I call for genuine Moderate Muslims who reject conquest, genocide and terrorism to publicly proclaim the above cited ayat & ahadith to be the result of Satanic influence [22:52],  null & void; neither to be believed nor carried out. I call for them to sign and promote the Moderate Muslim Majority Rejecting Terrorism   petition. I call for the Grand Mufti at Al-Azhar to issue a fatwa forbidding the practice of Lesser Jihad, genocide and terrorism; abjuring the above cited ayat & ahadith and fiqh. I call upon CAIR, ISNA, MPAC, FMCAT & AIFD   to do the same.

Last, but not least, I call on the elected leadership of this nation to quit spewing feces such as President Bush spewed at the American Legion Convention:

The murderers and beheaders are not the true face of Islam; they are the face of evil. They seek to exploit religion as a path to power and a means to dominate the Middle East. The violent Islamic radicalism that inspires them has two main strains.

Islam, as preached and practiced by Muhammad, is the true face of evil. Muhammad created Islam for the purpose of accruing wealth, income, power and sex slaves. That’s what Islam is. That’s what Islam does. It is not hijacked, distorted nor perverted. Neither is it moderate nor radical; it is Islam.  I disrespectfully demand that those who lead us, those who seek to lead us and those who claim to educate & inform us  quit spewing feces and acknowledge objective factual reality.

True Meanings of Muslim "Labels"

Hat Tip to Miss Ladybug at The Victory Caucus for this one! It comes from the comment section at Blackfive during a conversation regarding what to call the Ft. Dix Six. As the writer of this states, I wonder how CAIR is going to react to this?

Here’s the article:

Comment below written by: @thepointyend

Personally, I like it when their warriors are hole-ey.

From the Stromata Blog last year:

The Hirabah of the Mufsidun

While I doubt that the Moslem world is much influenced by whatever Westerners say, new terms of denigration for Islamofascism are always welcome (first seen at Never Yet Melted):

We cannot win wide-spread support throughout the Muslim world if we use terms that, to them, define the behavior of our enemies as moral. Because the Global War on Terrorism—or more precisely the war against Islamic totalitarian terrorism—includes a war of ideas, leaders, journalists, authors and speakers must use the most accurate terms to describe those ideas. . . .

Many of these terms will be unfamiliar to Westerners, but not to most Muslim audiences. Only those who actively, passively or even unwittingly [emphasis in original] support al-Qa’ida’s (and similar groups’) professed goals would find the terms, and their use by non-Muslims, offensive. .

Hirabah: this word, which is derived from the Arabic root which refers to war or combat, means sinful warfare, warfare contrary to Islamic law. There is ample legal justification for applying this term to Islamic totalitarian terrorists and no moral ambiguity in its connotation. We should describe the Islamic totalitarian movement as the global hirabah, not the global jihad [footnote omitted].

Mufsid (moofsid): this word refers to an evil or corrupt person; the plural is mufsidun. We call our enemies mufsidun, not jihadis, for two reasons. Again, there is no moral ambiguity and the specific denotation of corruption carries enormous weight in most of the Islamic world.

Fitna/fattan: fitna literally means temptation or trial, but has come to refer to discord and strife among Muslims; a fattan is a tempter or subversive. Applying these terms to our enemies and their works condemns their current activities as divisive and harmful [footnote omitted]. It also identifies them with movements and individuals in Islamic history with negative reputations such as the assassins of the Caliph ‘Uthman in 656, who created the first fissure in the political unity of the Muslim community.

Totalitarian: calling our enemies totalitarian serves several purposes. There is no such thing as a benign totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is a Western invention and it appeared in the Islamic world as a result of Western influence (first fascist, then Marxist-Leninist). It is also in direct contrast to the idea that the enemy would actually establish a caliphate [a term with positive connotations for Moslems] if they defeat the United States, our allies and coalition partners.

I’ll be interested to observe the reaction of CAIR and its ilk if opponents of Islamic extremism start writing about hirabah, mufsidun and fattan.

To reiterate: “Only those who actively, passively or even unwittingly support al-Qa’ida’s (and similar groups’) professed goals would find the terms, and their use by non-Muslims, offensive.”

Lemme show you just who’s ‘ahkbar’, f-head.

Thanks again Miss Ladybug, for this GREAT piece of education!

True Meanings of Muslim "Labels"


Hat Tip to Miss Ladybug at The Victory Caucus for this one! It comes from the comment section at Blackfive during a conversation regarding what to call the Ft. Dix Six. As the writer of this states, I wonder how CAIR is going to react to this?

Here’s the article:

Comment below written by: @thepointyend

Personally, I like it when their warriors are hole-ey.

From the Stromata Blog last year:

The Hirabah of the Mufsidun

While I doubt that the Moslem world is much influenced by whatever Westerners say, new terms of denigration for Islamofascism are always welcome (first seen at Never Yet Melted):

We cannot win wide-spread support throughout the Muslim world if we use terms that, to them, define the behavior of our enemies as moral. Because the Global War on Terrorism—or more precisely the war against Islamic totalitarian terrorism—includes a war of ideas, leaders, journalists, authors and speakers must use the most accurate terms to describe those ideas. . . .

Many of these terms will be unfamiliar to Westerners, but not to most Muslim audiences. Only those who actively, passively or even unwittingly [emphasis in original] support al-Qa’ida’s (and similar groups’) professed goals would find the terms, and their use by non-Muslims, offensive. .

Hirabah: this word, which is derived from the Arabic root which refers to war or combat, means sinful warfare, warfare contrary to Islamic law. There is ample legal justification for applying this term to Islamic totalitarian terrorists and no moral ambiguity in its connotation. We should describe the Islamic totalitarian movement as the global hirabah, not the global jihad [footnote omitted].

Mufsid (moofsid): this word refers to an evil or corrupt person; the plural is mufsidun. We call our enemies mufsidun, not jihadis, for two reasons. Again, there is no moral ambiguity and the specific denotation of corruption carries enormous weight in most of the Islamic world.

Fitna/fattan: fitna literally means temptation or trial, but has come to refer to discord and strife among Muslims; a fattan is a tempter or subversive. Applying these terms to our enemies and their works condemns their current activities as divisive and harmful [footnote omitted]. It also identifies them with movements and individuals in Islamic history with negative reputations such as the assassins of the Caliph ‘Uthman in 656, who created the first fissure in the political unity of the Muslim community.

Totalitarian: calling our enemies totalitarian serves several purposes. There is no such thing as a benign totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is a Western invention and it appeared in the Islamic world as a result of Western influence (first fascist, then Marxist-Leninist). It is also in direct contrast to the idea that the enemy would actually establish a caliphate [a term with positive connotations for Moslems] if they defeat the United States, our allies and coalition partners.

I’ll be interested to observe the reaction of CAIR and its ilk if opponents of Islamic extremism start writing about hirabah, mufsidun and fattan.

To reiterate: “Only those who actively, passively or even unwittingly support al-Qa’ida’s (and similar groups’) professed goals would find the terms, and their use by non-Muslims, offensive.”

Lemme show you just who’s ‘ahkbar’, f-head.

Thanks again Miss Ladybug, for this GREAT piece of education!