Bury Alien Amnesty!

Now that we know Majority Leader Reid intends to ram through Alien Amnesty, the time has come to bury the issue once and for all. Sweet, gentle emails, faxes & phone calls stopped it twice, but like a vampire, it keeps coming back from the dead.

Lets bury it so deep they can never dig it up again. http://www.congress.org provides a means of sending emails to the President, your Representative & Senators with a single, simple form.

In the box labeled My Elected Officials, enter your zip code. Under the heading Write Your Elected Officials, click the Federal link. Select Immigration as the issue and compose your message. In the body of your message, tell them that the bottom line is on a web page and give them a link to http://snooper.wordpress.com/no-amnesty/#Loud.

Their editor does not have a provision for entering links. Use html. Copy and paste this into your message:

Loud & Clear.

In Letters to Leaders, that comes through like this: Loud & Clear. Near the bottom of the form there is an option button, cleared by default, labeled Letters to Leaders. Select that option so that everyone can see your message.

When the recipients click the link, they will see a big, bold unmistakably clear message of outraged rejection; a four word profane execration followed by exclamation points. The clincher follows the exclamation points.

My vote depends on your vote. Be careful when voting and make no mistakes.

MAMA

The following was received by email from the Coalition to Stop Shariah. It relates to a doll you have probably heard about; which says “Islam is the light.”. Is the doll programmed to implant a positive suggestion about Islam in the minds of little girls too young to understand the full implications of Moe’s Murder Cult? Either way, the doll’s repertoire could be an unpleasant surprise for many. What would happen if a doll made a negative statement about Islam?

If you seek more information or wish to take action, you will find helpful links in the body of the email which follows.

For those who are unfamaliar with Shariah, it is Islamic law distilled from Allah’s Word and Moe’s Sunnah. It finds its clearest expression in Reliance of the Traveller, 1200 + page hand book of Shafi’i school rulings.

Sharia regulates nearly all facets of human life, including post defecation hygiene [E9], marriage [M], divorce [N] and alcohol [O16.0]. [Use Scribid’s search tool to find the Book & Chapter.]

The email mentions the invitation to embrace Islam. It does not tell you that the invitation is a necessary prelude to military attack, stated in [O9.8] based on Moe’s explicit order in Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4294: “Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. “. Once you have rejected the ‘invitation’, a demand for tribute may be made and you may be attacked.

For more information:

labelthatdoll@gmail.com

www.labelthatdoll.com

We’re writing to ask for your help with a local citizen’s campaign this December. Our goal is to convince stores to stop selling a Mattel talking doll that says “Islam is the light,” a way of inviting someone to join Islam – also know as “Da’wa.” We have started this campaign in Virginia and Maryland, and we need your help to take it nationwide.

The controversial toy is called the “Little Mommy Real Loving Baby Cuddle & Coo” doll, manufactured by Mattel-Fisher Price. We’ve put up a website – http://www.labelthatdoll.com – to provide resources for parents to download an information packet to give to store managers. As parents, we’ve already started asking store managers to remove the dolls from the store shelves, or to put labels on the dolls stating “Notice: this doll says ‘Islam is the light,’ an invitation to your child to join Islam.”

THE “ISLAM IS THE LIGHT” DOLL IS STILL ON THE SHELVES

You may have heard about this controversy in the media. It received a lot of print and TV media attention in October and earlier in November. Yet – hard as it is to believe – most stores are still carrying the doll on their shelves for the holiday shopping season. The doll has no warning label letting parents know that it clearly says “Islam is the light.” In fact, we found one store in Virginia where the dolls had the audio disabled AND the front packaging panel (where the name is displayed) ripped off, which made it harder for parents to know that this was the controversial doll. A few newer dolls are being distributed without the sound file, but most still say “Islam is the light.”

Bottom line – parents are still buying the doll RIGHT NOW, taking it home, and may not realize what the doll says until Christmas morning when their child unwraps the package and the doll tells her that “Islam is the light.”

MATTEL DENIES EVERYTHING

You’d think Mattel would have recalled the doll after parents complained, after some retailers pulled it in response to parent complaints, and after about twenty Youtube videos went up spontaneously from parents and local TV news stations showing that the doll was really saying “Islam is the light.” But no. Mattel denies everything.

Mattel has flatly denied that the doll audio files say “Islam is the light,” and has stated that parents are hearing the phrase “Islam is the light” because of “power of suggestion.” Mattel even put up their “version” of the doll’s audio file on their investors and media webpage, although an actual recording of the doll’s audio appears to be VERY different (see the “audio research” link at www.labelthatdoll.com ).

JOIN OUR CAMPAIGN TO NOTIFY STORE MANAGERS AND PARENTS

We decided enough is enough – store managers need to get the doll off the shelves, or at least label the packaging for each doll so parents know what they are buying their kids for Christmas. We’ve sent a formal complaint to the Federal Trade Commission, and we’ve put together information packets you can take to store managers to inform them about the doll (including a sheet of 30 labels they can put on the doll packaging). At www.labelthatdoll.com , we have created a “case” reporting system for each store: just email us basic info about the store you visited and the store manager’s response, and we’ll put it up so everyone can track the progress in that case. You can see how we’ve started to do this at the “Cases” link at www.labelthatdoll.com .

If you can visit just one store – just one – you can make a difference.

This campaign is also a way to educate our communities about the threat of the Islamic legal and political doctrine of Shariah. Shariah is particularly discriminatory and violent towards Muslim and non-Muslim girls and women. This unadvertised use of a doll – without any notice to parents in the doll’s packaging – to advocate Islam to children is particularly offensive and inappropriate, given the very real risks to girls under Shariah.

Please visit the campaign website at www.labelthatdoll.com . If you have questions or suggestions, contact us at labelthatdoll@gmail.com . And please print out the information packet, take it to a store manager at Target, Kmart, Walmart and other stores selling toys (store locators are at the website), and politely but firmly request that they remove the doll or use the labels. And if they don’t remove it right away, contact us with info on your visit and we’ll post their case at the website.

The Marines have a good saying: “We do well that which we know will be inspected.” We need to let store managers know that parents across America, this holiday season, are inspecting them for their responsiveness to community concerns about the “Islam is the Light” doll.

Thanks for any assistance you can provide, and Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah!

Regards,

Catherine Martin, Chapter leader, ACT for America, Northern Virginia Chapter

Jeffrey Imm, Anti-Jihad League of America

John Cosgrove, Chapter leader, United American Committee, Virginia Chapter
Christine Brim, Coalition to Stop Shariah
Denise Lee, parent

AIDS: Overblown Global Crisis?

Cross posted from Monkey in the Middle

Today is World AIDS Day. The day the whole world is suppose to remember that there is an pandemic happening through out the world. Right now, about 40 million people in the world are living with HIV infection or AIDS. This estimate includes 37 million adults and 2.5 million children. In the United States alone, more than 1 million people are living with HIV. A large number, but there are other diseases that infect more people and take more lives each year.

As World AIDS Day is marked on Monday, some experts are growing more outspoken in complaining that AIDS is eating up funding at the expense of more pressing health needs.

They argue that the world has entered a post-AIDS era in which the disease’s spread has largely been curbed in much of the world, Africa excepted.

In Africa some nations are almost 100% infected. Uganda is one of these. And those infected are not able to receive the necessary medical treatment needed for long term survival. Drugs that can slow the infection rate down, or prevent secondary infections from occurring are not being given to those most needy. Some of this is due to the cost of the drugs, other is the bureaucracy in many of the developing world.

Roger England of Health Systems Workshop, a think tank based in the Caribbean island of Grenada, goes further. He argues that UNAIDS, the U.N. agency leading the fight against the disease, has outlived its purpose and should be disbanded.

“The global HIV industry is too big and out of control. We have created a monster with too many vested interests and reputations at stake, … too many relatively well paid HIV staff in affected countries, and too many rock stars with AIDS support as a fashion accessory,” he wrote in the British Medical Journal in May.

Just like every other UN Agency it seems. This is nothing new. Just another bit of wasteful money mostly donated by American Taxpayers.

Paul de Lay, a director at UNAIDS, disagrees. It’s valid to question AIDS’ place in the world’s priorities, he says, but insists the turnaround is very recent and it would be wrong to think the epidemic is under control.

“We have an epidemic that has caused between 55 million and 60 million infections,” de Lay said. “To suddenly pull the rug out from underneath that would be disastrous.”

The estimate of 55 to 60 million people is a bit high. It is more like 35 to 40 million people, many of which would not have been infected if the men of their nations would wear a condom. But that would mean that they aren’t masculine enough. It would demean their manhood to wear one. So they don’t, they visit prostitutes who are infected, they become infected and then infect their wives. Nice gift honey but I wanted a new washing machine!

U.N. officials roughly estimate that about 33 million people worldwide have HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. Scientists say infections peaked in the late 1990s and are unlikely to spark big epidemics beyond Africa.

In developed countries, AIDS drugs have turned the once-fatal disease into a manageable illness.

And the rate of infection is also down. The highest risk groups today are drug users and teenagers. I guess teens don’t believe in safe sex either.

England argues that closing UNAIDS would free up its $200 million annual budget for other health problems such as pneumonia, which kills more children every year than AIDS, malaria and measles combined.

“By putting more money into AIDS, we are implicitly saying it’s OK for more kids to die of pneumonia,” England said.

Measles can be prevented by inoculations. They are low cost and do work. Pneumonia kills millions each year, but we keep hearing there isn’t any money to help these people.

His comments touch on the bigger complaint: that AIDS hogs money and may damage other health programs.

By 2006, AIDS funding accounted for 80 percent of all American aid for health and population issues, according to the Global Health Council.

In Ethiopia, Rwanda, Uganda and elsewhere, donations for HIV projects routinely outstrip the entire national health budgets.

In a 2006 report, Rwandan officials noted a “gross misallocation of resources” in health: $47 million went to HIV, $18 million went to malaria, the country’s biggest killer, and $1 million went to childhood illnesses.

It is time that these nations get to use the donated funds where they need it the most. If malaria is killing more people each year, then they should use the funds there. It is the logical approach to a health crisis that these nations are facing.

AIDS advocates say their projects do more than curb the virus; their efforts strengthen other health programs by providing basic health services.

But across Africa, about 1.5 million doctors and nurses are still needed, and hospitals regularly run out of basic medicines.

Experts working on other health problems struggle to attract money and attention when competing with AIDS.

What good is basic medical services when there are no medicines to treat the basics? In Africa there is a shortage of doctors, nurses, medical technicians, and medicines. There is no shortage of suffering though.

“Diarrhea kills five times as many kids as AIDS,” said John Oldfield, executive vice president of Water Advocates, a Washington, D.C.-based organization that promotes clean water and sanitation.

“Everybody talks about AIDS at cocktail parties,” Oldfield said. “But nobody wants to hear about diarrhea,” he said.

Full Story

I’m sorry Mr. Oldfield, but there is no way you are going to ever get anyone to talk about diarrhea at a cocktail party. At a frat house party, maybe. But the average person doesn’t even like to think about diarrhea.

AIDS is a glamor disease. Scores of the A-List celebrities just have to come out and say something about AIDS every year. If you don’t, then your career is ruined. But Roger England is correct. The world is spending too many resources on one illness and neglecting other serious problems. It is time that the individual nations involved in this have a bigger say on where donated monies should be spent. Yes AIDS patients should receive the medicines that will help them survive many years, but money should be spent to prevent treatable illnesses like measles, to help patients with malaria, and even start providing the basic health care that would prevent all these illnesses.

And on this World AIDS Day, I think that my tax money would be spent in a better way.

AIDS: Overblown Global Crisis?

Cross posted from Monkey in the Middle

Today is World AIDS Day. The day the whole world is suppose to remember that there is an pandemic happening through out the world. Right now, about 40 million people in the world are living with HIV infection or AIDS. This estimate includes 37 million adults and 2.5 million children. In the United States alone, more than 1 million people are living with HIV. A large number, but there are other diseases that infect more people and take more lives each year.

As World AIDS Day is marked on Monday, some experts are growing more outspoken in complaining that AIDS is eating up funding at the expense of more pressing health needs.

They argue that the world has entered a post-AIDS era in which the disease’s spread has largely been curbed in much of the world, Africa excepted.

In Africa some nations are almost 100% infected. Uganda is one of these. And those infected are not able to receive the necessary medical treatment needed for long term survival. Drugs that can slow the infection rate down, or prevent secondary infections from occurring are not being given to those most needy. Some of this is due to the cost of the drugs, other is the bureaucracy in many of the developing world.

Roger England of Health Systems Workshop, a think tank based in the Caribbean island of Grenada, goes further. He argues that UNAIDS, the U.N. agency leading the fight against the disease, has outlived its purpose and should be disbanded.

“The global HIV industry is too big and out of control. We have created a monster with too many vested interests and reputations at stake, … too many relatively well paid HIV staff in affected countries, and too many rock stars with AIDS support as a fashion accessory,” he wrote in the British Medical Journal in May.

Just like every other UN Agency it seems. This is nothing new. Just another bit of wasteful money mostly donated by American Taxpayers.

Paul de Lay, a director at UNAIDS, disagrees. It’s valid to question AIDS’ place in the world’s priorities, he says, but insists the turnaround is very recent and it would be wrong to think the epidemic is under control.

“We have an epidemic that has caused between 55 million and 60 million infections,” de Lay said. “To suddenly pull the rug out from underneath that would be disastrous.”

The estimate of 55 to 60 million people is a bit high. It is more like 35 to 40 million people, many of which would not have been infected if the men of their nations would wear a condom. But that would mean that they aren’t masculine enough. It would demean their manhood to wear one. So they don’t, they visit prostitutes who are infected, they become infected and then infect their wives. Nice gift honey but I wanted a new washing machine!

U.N. officials roughly estimate that about 33 million people worldwide have HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. Scientists say infections peaked in the late 1990s and are unlikely to spark big epidemics beyond Africa.

In developed countries, AIDS drugs have turned the once-fatal disease into a manageable illness.

And the rate of infection is also down. The highest risk groups today are drug users and teenagers. I guess teens don’t believe in safe sex either.

England argues that closing UNAIDS would free up its $200 million annual budget for other health problems such as pneumonia, which kills more children every year than AIDS, malaria and measles combined.

“By putting more money into AIDS, we are implicitly saying it’s OK for more kids to die of pneumonia,” England said.

Measles can be prevented by inoculations. They are low cost and do work. Pneumonia kills millions each year, but we keep hearing there isn’t any money to help these people.

His comments touch on the bigger complaint: that AIDS hogs money and may damage other health programs.

By 2006, AIDS funding accounted for 80 percent of all American aid for health and population issues, according to the Global Health Council.

In Ethiopia, Rwanda, Uganda and elsewhere, donations for HIV projects routinely outstrip the entire national health budgets.

In a 2006 report, Rwandan officials noted a “gross misallocation of resources” in health: $47 million went to HIV, $18 million went to malaria, the country’s biggest killer, and $1 million went to childhood illnesses.

It is time that these nations get to use the donated funds where they need it the most. If malaria is killing more people each year, then they should use the funds there. It is the logical approach to a health crisis that these nations are facing.

AIDS advocates say their projects do more than curb the virus; their efforts strengthen other health programs by providing basic health services.

But across Africa, about 1.5 million doctors and nurses are still needed, and hospitals regularly run out of basic medicines.

Experts working on other health problems struggle to attract money and attention when competing with AIDS.

What good is basic medical services when there are no medicines to treat the basics? In Africa there is a shortage of doctors, nurses, medical technicians, and medicines. There is no shortage of suffering though.

“Diarrhea kills five times as many kids as AIDS,” said John Oldfield, executive vice president of Water Advocates, a Washington, D.C.-based organization that promotes clean water and sanitation.

“Everybody talks about AIDS at cocktail parties,” Oldfield said. “But nobody wants to hear about diarrhea,” he said.

Full Story

I’m sorry Mr. Oldfield, but there is no way you are going to ever get anyone to talk about diarrhea at a cocktail party. At a frat house party, maybe. But the average person doesn’t even like to think about diarrhea.

AIDS is a glamor disease. Scores of the A-List celebrities just have to come out and say something about AIDS every year. If you don’t, then your career is ruined. But Roger England is correct. The world is spending too many resources on one illness and neglecting other serious problems. It is time that the individual nations involved in this have a bigger say on where donated monies should be spent. Yes AIDS patients should receive the medicines that will help them survive many years, but money should be spent to prevent treatable illnesses like measles, to help patients with malaria, and even start providing the basic health care that would prevent all these illnesses.

And on this World AIDS Day, I think that my tax money would be spent in a better way.